User talk:Dueep Eik

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Dueep Eik! Thank you for your contributions. I am Lee Vilenski and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:26, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Lutfunnisa Begum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Consort

Manolya Onur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Berar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

Hi, the two sources you used at Mirza Muhammad Karim us-Shuja are not considered to be reliable, per discussions at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard. Please do not use them in future. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 15:40, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is also not reliable and, together with a bookselling website called exoticindianart, you seem to be spamming it all over the place. Please do not use those links. - Sitush (talk) 15:51, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Baroda State into Maharajas of Baroda. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:03, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Govind Rao Gaekwar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Govind Rao Gaekwar. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Govind Rao Gaekwad. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Govind Rao Gaekwad. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. FITINDIA 18:03, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mirza Muhammad Ghani ul-Mulk and Zakiat-un-Nisa Begum moved to Draft:Mirza Muhammad Ghani ul-Mulk and Draft:Zakiat-un-Nisa Begum

Hi , Greetings. Pls note that your creation of Mirza Muhammad Ghani ul-Mulk and Zakiat-un-Nisa Begumhave been moved to Draft:Mirza Muhammad Ghani ul-Mulk and Draft:Zakiat-un-Nisa Begum. Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs "inline citation" from independent (third party / secondary / tertiary) reliable source (in any language) for verification to gauge the nobility criteria is met. The articles's inline citation is the WP:BURDEN which it is on the person adding the information. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such as facebook, twitter, instagram, imbd and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald, CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press). Pls see

reliable source - see WP:RS (Note: Wikipedia can NOT be the source - see WP:CIRCULAR)
primary vs secondary vs tiartiary source - see WP:WPNOTRS
verification - see WP:V
notability - see WP:N
citing source - see WP:Citing sources and WP:Tutorial/Citing sources
citing from internet sourc - see WP:CITEWEB and its template -see Template: cite web

For more editing help, you could send your question to the friendly and helpful volunteers at the Teahouse. Lastly, I strongly encourage you to visit WP:The Wikipedia Adventure for there are some short and fun exercises on neutrality, verifiability, collaboration, research and sourcing. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:43, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MUHAMMAD SAFIULLAH, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Saqib (talk) 07:20, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]