User talk:Dshibshm

Welcome!

Hello, Dshibshm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Also, please use an edit summary when making changes. That way others users can quickly know what you are changing! -Phoenixrod (talk) 06:19, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes

Only add the main postion of each players in the infobox, not each positon that they ever played, I already warned you once, you are going against consensus. This is a Secret ^account 13:43, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Once again, let me ask you kindly to use edit summaries. You are making lots of edits -- take a couple seconds to let everyone know what they are. And keep up the good work on baseball articles. -Phoenixrod (talk) 03:17, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If by good work you mean bad work...►Chris Nelson^Holla! 04:01, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... I randomly checked only a couple of changes, and they seemed fine. What's the bad work? -Phoenixrod (talk) 06:21, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of the edit he is making are wrong and misinformed. --Rabbethan 06:27, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where are you getting the information for your edits? A good number of the edits you are making are full of false information. Can you please fact check before you make these edits? Also, there is no need to makes 9 changes on a single page by editing and submitting them one by one. I'm sure once you get the hang of editing and fact checking, you will be a valued contributor to Wikipedia. --Rabbethan 06:25, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's been an issue with nearly all of his edits. Whether it's adding incorrect numbers, incorrect players, changing the way numbers are done, etc., he's making a big mess and nearly all his edits are having to be undone.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 13:43, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tampa Bay Rays vs Tampa Bay Devil Rays

The consensus has been reached that players who played for the Devil Rays before the name change will have their articles state that they played for the Devil Rays and not the Rays. You can read the discussion here. --Rabbethan 17:45, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Player numbers

For the player numbers, I suggest you not take them from ESPN. They are inaccurate and when they add signed free agents to the roster, they will usually intially put up their old number. --Street20 03:50, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When you change a player's number, can you please put a source in the edit summary? --Rabbethan 08:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Positions

When a player is a center fielder, there is no need for you to change the reference to say instead that they are an outfielder.--Epeefleche (talk) 00:44, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Devil Rays

your are becoming a pain in the ass with this,please stop they were colled the D-Rays last year--Rockies17 (talk) 04:20, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Templates & view/discuss/edit

I saw your question on Template:Oakland Athleticsabout the v/d/e on a table. Certain template styles (like Template:navbox) have them included, or you can add Template:Tnavbar-header to insert them "manually". Hope this helps.

The edit link points to the name of the template as specified in the template. So, the location indicated in the temp must be the acutal location of the temp. Hope this helps. Be sure to take a look at the coding of pre-existing tables to learn more. -NatureBoyMD (talk) 02:38, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 23:43, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

players positions

please do not add a players second position to the infobox, because when you do that there is a red link, you keep on doing it despite people undoing your edits, so please stop--Yankees10 (talk) 03:25, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't we change the MLB infobox to accomodate multiple positions, like the NFL infobox? -Street20 21:22, 05 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

good idea, do you know how to do that?--Yankees10 (talk) 21:56, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All we have to do is de-link the field in the infobox, so that you can link it yourself.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 21:59, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eddie Guardado

I have reverted your changes to Eddie Guardado. Guardado has not signed with the team. I would advise you not to make such changes without citing reliable sources. Caknuck (talk) 00:37, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Rabbethan 12:01, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template colors

If the colors of the MLB templates you were changing were correct, people would stop reverting them. --Rabbethan 00:05, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Haven't you noticed that everyone reverts basically everything you do?►Chris Nelson^Holla! 00:07, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your controversial edits

Some of the stuff that you edit is wrong.

Let me just give some examples: You made an edit to Manny Ramírez which said that he was born in the Bronx when he was actually born in the Dominican Republic, which I reverted as vandalism. In the case of Josh Towers, he has not finalized his contract and the only things that we put in the roster templates are official. Not finalizing his contract is not official. In the case of adding numbers, you kept saying that Guillermo Mota was going to be #53, turns out he took #58. Other examples include saying that Geoff Geary was going to take #56 when he took #29 and José Castillo taking number #15 when he took #13. Some other edits that you do, like to the Houston Astros, Philadelphia Phillies, and Tampa Bay Rays roster templates, is to delete the space between players who go by their initials, for example J. R. Towles. You would constantly change J. R. Towles into J.R. Towles and we would constantly change it back yet you insisted on reverting our edits back. In the case of infoboxes, you kept adding multiple positions so you would make the link invalid, which is why we added another part to the infobox so you can put in multiple positions without having any problems. Yet after we did this, you still added multiple positions to 'position' after you already learned that we added the 'positionplain' section to the infobox. I also just reverted your edit that you made to Template:Kansas City Royals roster in which you put Billy Butler as a designated hitter yet you should of have already learned that we strictly follow MLB.com when it comes to players positions. This is why when you put Ryan Braun in the list of outfielders in Template:Milwaukee Brewers roster, it was reverted. Other stuff that you do was to constantly change the colors in the roster templates even after we told you not to do it. The colors have already been established and there is no reason for you to change it. -Street20 22:31, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's style is that there is a space between initials. I personally hate it, but that's the way it is.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 01:46, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 01:50, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pirates

Hello. I reverted your edits to {{Pirates}} and moved it back to the original place (you moved it to Famouse Pirates). If you are moving something, you first need to ask for consensus on the Talk page. Also the Pittsburgh Pirates do not need that space. There is already a template for Pittsburgh Pirates at {{MLB_Pirates_franchise}}. Pirates takes priorty over the baseball team since Piracy is the actual thing while it is only the mascot of the baseball team. Thanks! Deflagro ^C/_T 22:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't "correct" talk pages

When someone makes a comment on a talk page, other editors should leave it alone except in cases where the comment violates policy, and even then, they need to mark the change. If someone is too illiterate to spell and frame a comment correctly, many of use that information in evaluating the comment itself.Kww (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 23:13, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bedard and Jones

I reverted both the Adam Jones and Erik Bedard pages for the time being, let's wait until the trade is actually announced/spoken of by someone with either organization. Thanks. CiTrusD (talk) 02:59, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I love fullhouse even though i wasn't born when it was originally played

MLB Player Status Changes=

Please wait for a team to make an official announcement before updating the appropriate pages. Very often - deals fall through at the last minute... or were nothing more than a rumor. An "agreement" is not official. JustSomeRandomGuy32 (talk) 19:47, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All-Time rosters

You shouldn't be adding new people to Major League team all-time rosters until they actually appear in a game for that team. Those rosters reflect only people who have played for the team in a MLB game. Spanneraol (talk) 18:15, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Luis Gonzalez

The deal between the Marlins and Luis Gonzalez is not official. It's just an agreement at this point, it has not be announced, and it could very well fall through. Please stop posting it. --Rabbethan 19:40, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you take my reply to one of your incorrect statements off a talk page again, I will report you to an admin. --Rabbethan 20:01, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup hitter

Very interesting chart you've added to Cleanup hitter. If possible, could you provide references there? Thanks! Kingturtle (talk) 20:54, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He can't... It's all speculation and projections.... Doesn't belong. JustSomeRandomGuy32 (talk) 21:13, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We have references to make such a chart for 2007, if you like. Kingturtle (talk) 21:14, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Closer, Ace, Leadoff hitter, and Cleanup hitter

Will you please stop putting these unsourced statements to which you have no proof of in these pages. We have told you numerous times about this and the policies of Wikipedia. At this point, you are just becoming vandalous. Stop it. --Rabbethan 01:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In response to what you said on my talk page, I didn't delete them, I re-hid them like Street20 had done. We (Chris Nelson, Street20, JustSomeRandomGuy32, Yankees10, myself, and others) have told you several times that the edits you were making to those and other pages needed to be sourced and about how you would go along with such a thing, but even after two months of having to revert numerous edits, a good number of them wrong, you have yet to grasp the concept that you need to check your sources before you make edits. So what I did is not "messed up", as you put it. Quite the opposite, I had to un-mess up what you have been doing despite what everyone has been telling you. --Rabbethan 03:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop editing those pages!! We have told you why, and you keep doing it! Projections, especially your terrible projections, have no place on Wikipedia! --Rabbethan 23:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Find a reliable source that addresses your claim, and add it to this article citing the source. Kingturtle (talk) 23:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Gregg.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Gregg.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:AMill.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:AMill.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:02, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images from MLB.com

You can NOT use any images from MLB.com, or any other copyrighted images. --Rabbethan 21:40, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

things to read

As you continue to grow as a Wikipedia editor there are a few helpful pages for you to read. I realize there are a lot of restrictions in what you can do here, but I think you will also see that there are even more potentials in what you can do here.

Cheers, Kingturtle (talk) 21:52, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Step by Step (TV series). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:15, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Anibal.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Anibal.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:41, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Kotsay.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Kotsay.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:58, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Why must you ignore everything anyone tells you about how to properly contribute on Wikipedia? You can't use those images! Also, don't say that you got permission to use images that you didn't get. Getty is very strict about how their images are used. --Rabbethan 01:14, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Anibal.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Anibal.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:31, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kotsay.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kotsay.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:31, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jorge Sosa

Can you please provide a source for saying he is a switch hitter? All the sources I see say you are wrong. --Rabbethan 18:04, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, have you ever considered that the one source, an article posted almost 2 years ago, might be wrong when put up against all the most commonly used sources, such as MLB, ESPN, Baseball-Reference.com, The Baseball Cube, and Fan Graphs? Or maybe that he was formerly a switch hitter but no longer is one, like Nook Logan? --Rabbethan 18:23, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bilde.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bilde.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:08, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Bilde.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Bilde.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria.

If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the image is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:Bilde.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Rabbethan 03:16, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Kotsay.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Kotsay.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:Kotsay.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Rabbethan 03:28, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Anibal.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Anibal.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:Anibal.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Rabbethan 03:28, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Player's names

Just because a player's name is "Ben" or "Billy", doesn't mean that their given name is "Benjamin" or "William". Sometimes, their name is actually Billy, despite being unusual for a given name. Please check your sources before changing them, namely MLB.com. --Rabbethan 05:35, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pittsburgh Pirates

Why in the world did you move Pittsburgh Pirates to Pitt Pirates???? JustSomeRandomGuy32 (talk) 06:02, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rugrats, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Also removed template from Angelica Pickles and added nonsense to Tommy Pickles TheProf | 2007 12:05, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kansas City Royals roster

Just a note on your recent edits to Template:Kansas City Royals roster. First, please do not add any protection templates to pages which are not protected. The template itself does nothing to protect the page -- only an admin can do that.

Second, please do not rely on wikis for solid information about rosters. This particular template should mirror the information found at the Official Royals website, which has Butler in the infield. Until that site changes where they have Butler, please don't change the template here. Thanks!--Fabrictramp (talk) 18:30, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Rabelo picture

There, I traveled to Jupiter just to get one that was better than the last. You can now proceed to leaving it alone and no longer upload copyrighted images. --Rabbethan 01:14, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Rugrats characters

An editor has nominated List of Rugrats characters, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Rugrats characters and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 14:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Isaac Bruce

Bruce will not wear 80 for the 49ers. What is it about you that has you consistently making bad edits that others have to undo? It's constant.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 17:23, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, he's not.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 18:23, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, why do you continue to make incorrect edits day after day after day?►Chris Nelson^Holla! 21:34, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Skippy.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Skippy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:53, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images

How many times do I have to tell you that you can't upload copy righted images? --Rabbethan 01:05, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletions

I've deleted Image:Bilde.jpg, Image:Skippy.jpg, and Image:SethGabel.jpg per (CSD g12), was a blatant copyright infringement‎. You've been warned about your image uploads several times. This is the final warning you will receive. Any further uploads of copyrighted images as your own work and you will be blocked from editing. This is inappropriate and puts Wikipedia at risk. If you have questions please feel free to ask me. Lara❤Love 20:05, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image removals

Why did you remove images with this edit and this edit? Can you please assist in undoing your edits where images were removed without cause? —Wknight94 (talk) 02:10, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Ewing, Jr. uniform number

[1] - See.... yet another example of why you don't add speculation to a wiki page. He isn't wearing #33. JustSomeRandomGuy32 (talk) 22:13, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Miami Heat roster

Please stop removing Blake Ahearn. He is listed on the official roster, and if you remove him, you would also have to remove Mourning and Powell. Thank you for your understanding. ● 8 ~Hype ^@ 20:41, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Roster changes

Stop removing Damon Jones, and doing other changes that are not official yet. ● 8 ~Hype ^@ 14:07, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then why does his wiki site say he is a free agent?-DANO- (talk) 23:55, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, as well. It's wrong. ● 8 ~Hype ^@ 08:35, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have already told you this before.... Wikipedia sites are not to be used as sources. Just because one idiot makes an unnoticed wrong edit on one page - doesn't give you a reason to continue that edit elsewhere. JustSomeRandomGuy32 (talk) 16:28, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Per WP:CRYSTAL, please wait until official trade announcements before making roster edits to Wiki articles. Thanks. --Madchester (talk) 02:36, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Paul McAnulty

Until the Red Sox say they've invited him to spring training, or you see him listed here, don't list anyone as a spring training invite on the roster template! Is that so hard to understand? These templates reflect the mlb.com roster pages. Your article only says that he has signed a minor league deal and his agent hopes he can make the team. Assuming that the Red Sox have officially invited him to Spring Training is WP:OR. JustSomeRandomGuy32 (talk) 20:22, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edgar Renteria

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

Again, please wait for an official signing announcement before making roster edits per WP:CRYSTAL. Thanks. --Madchester (talk) 05:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

warnings

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Cleanup hitter. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Leadoff hitter, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Kingturtle (talk) 23:43, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Cleanup hitter, you will be blocked from editing. Kingturtle (talk) 18:10, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for for repeatedly removing sourced information and adding speculative information. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kingturtle (talk) 03:19, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dshibshm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was just adding factual info. I never added anything negative or derogatory. I also run a wikia site, and I need to be able to do stuff on it.-DANO- (talk) 03:22, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Kingturtle is dead-on. Even I raised an issue with you removing baseball pictures for no reason. You ignored me then and you're ignoring the issues Kingturtle has raised now. Your unblock request is non sequitor. —Wknight94 (talk) 04:08, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This talk page shows a long history of your actions and your disregard of warnings. Among other things, you continue to remove cited information and add speculative information. I am hoping this block will make you realize that your actions have consequences. Kingturtle (talk) 03:29, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me-DANO- (talk) 03:35, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dshibshm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I never meant to ruin anything. My intentions were good, and I still am appealling

Decline reason:

This request doesn't indicate that you would do anything differently if you were unblocked. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:24, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dshibshm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Okay. Is the problem that I changed the "leadoff hitter" info? I'm not completely sure of the exact reason why I was blocked. It just happened out of the blue. If that is the reason, then just tell me and I will NEVER do it again. I shouldn't be blocked and not know the actual reason. It won't happen. I didn't realize that it was as bad a problem as it was. Now that I understand, it is easier for me to see. Please unblock me, and no further consequences will be needed.-DANO- (talk) 21:16, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have been blocked for removing valid content from articles, adding speculative content to articles and ignoring advise and warnings from other editors. Please review all the warnings on this talk page so that when the block ends, you will be a better editor upon your return. Kingturtle (talk) 21:28, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dshibshm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was deleting OLD INFO. For example, the page had some 2007 stats and 2008, but after 2008 is finished, no more need for 2007. It's just extra. Please unblock me. I never meant to ruin or damage anything. I was doing what I thought was right. Wiki is about CURRENT info, and I was making it current.

Decline reason:

That is patently not true. The Cleanup hitter article was cited to sources published in August of 2008; you changed the article entirely, changing many players, without explanation. In other cases, you simply deleted the sources with no explanation at all. You have been told many times to add sources to any changes you make. That you repeatedly refused to do so shows me that you have little desire to abide by Wikipedia policies. Also, please do not make any more unblock requests. Continuing to abuse the unblock process by shopping for an admin that will do what you want them to is disruptive. If you wish to be unblocked, please contact ARBCOM as described at WP:ARBCOM. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 21:57, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblocked

I have unblocked you because you have served for one week and because you promised me in an email that "no further issues like this EVER AGAIN." I assume that includes checking your sources, not adding future events, no edit wars and not removing other people's work. Kingturtle (talk) 21:45, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you're back and editing again, can you PLEASE use your edit summaries? Read Help:Edit summary. Thank you! Kingturtle (talk) 23:33, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! Yes, I will.-DANO- (talk) 23:42, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for starting to do so. It is really helpful to others. I know sometimes you still forget, but keep trying to get into the habit. Cheers, Kingturtle (talk) 05:36, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rafael Furcal

Please wait until he at least agrees to a deal (which he hasn't despite the ESPN report). Once the deal with either the Braves, the Dodgers or who whoever is finalized, not just agreed to, then go ahead and update it. But for now leave it alone. Thanks.--Iamawesome800 23:46, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dshibshm, I removed your block prior to its scheduled end because you promised to change your behavior. One of the things you promised to do was not add future events. Please refrain from such edits, or you may be blocked again. Kingturtle (talk) 23:57, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Source

~~Do you have a source saying the CC Sabathia deal is finalized?--Iamawesome800 03:04, 18 December 2008 (UTC)~~[reply]

Nevermind I got it.--Iamawesome800 03:37, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Zaun

Zaun status update from an article today [2] (as opposed to your article/blog post dated 1/16). "Zaun was in town Tuesday for his physical with the team. If everything checks out medically, the team will sign him to a one-year, $1.5 million contract -- with an option for 2010." JustSomeRandomGuy32 (talk) 23:17, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox MLB Retired

Please do not add this template to any more articles. The template's use is deprecated, and the link is now only a redirect to the MLB Player template. Thank you. -Dewelar (talk) 18:03, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, here's what I mean above. The term "deprecated" is used to refer to something that used to be used, but isn't any more because it's been replaced by something else. A couple months ago, the folks over at WikiProject Baseball decided that having separate infoboxes for active and retired players was no longer necessary. One of the members combined the information used in the two boxes and made it into one box, which is Template:Infobox MLB player. Since there are a lot of old articles (over 4,000 right now) that still use the old version, the old page was left up as a redirect to the new one. If a player is no longer active, all you have to do is delete the "team=" line (not debutteam or finalteam, but the one that's just "team") and the "number=", and that will remove the colors from the box, and the line with his current team, and it will look just like the old retired box.

Does that help? -Dewelar (talk) 19:39, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've been working on changing them, but since I don't know how to use bots I'm doing it all by hand. If you want to do some yourself, go ahead, just make sure you're only changing players that are actually retired.

As far as the MLBprimarycolor thing, I don't actually know where those are located. You might want to ask over at the WikiProject Baseball talk page. -Dewelar (talk) 19:47, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

please avoid potential edit war

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:MLBAceStartingPitchers. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Kingturtle (talk) 14:32, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Baltimore Orioles roster

I think you said that you got your information on MASN.com; but when I went there your recent changes (i.e. jersey #'s) did not match??? Ositadinma (talk) 18:49, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vladimir Núñez and Non-roster intivites.

Just because a guy plays in a Spring Training game does not mean he is a Spring Training Non-roster invitee to the major league camp. Teams have guys from the minor league camp fill in all the time. JustSomeRandomGuy32 (talk) 22:08, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mets coaches

I'm just as sure as you are that MBTN is likely correct with his listings for the Mets missing coaches numbers. However, that's just a personal blog. It does not qualify under WP:Verify. He even states that his info comes from a guy named David. (And, as we've been over before, "I saw in person" or "I saw on TV" doesn't qualify either.) JustSomeRandomGuy32 (talk) 22:14, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

Stop making incorrect edits to Template:NFLStartingQuarterbacks‎.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 02:21, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly it says "As of Week 17 of the 2008 season".►Chris Nelson^Holla! 03:39, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not intended to be updated. The template is and has always been intended to list the 32 most recent NFL starters at quarterback.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 04:12, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kingturtle (talk) 04:22, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moisés Alou

First, "is likely" is not the same as "is". Second, I've already asked you once (see above) not to use the Infobox MLB Retired template, as you did again on this page. -Dewelar (talk) 20:46, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Your recent edit to the page Template:New York Mets roster appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you may do and take a look at the welcome page, if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. MOOOOOPS (talk) 03:50, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI - I know he's #50.... Wikipedia has rules though. JustSomeRandomGuy32 (talk) 03:52, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly! Until he or someone else can provide a reliable source saying so, the info cannot be added, and you have clearly given him more than enough warnings to stop. I don't like issuing warnings, but this is enough already. MOOOOOPS (talk) 03:58, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jae Kuk Ryu

Please don't mass revert edits without checking out any sources first. Ryu was returned to the Padres today, then later waived (when I made my initial edit, there was no indication of him being waived, and he was in fact listed on the padres roster). It's made very clear all over the place (mlb.com transactions page, padres.com). And don't yell (type in caps) in your edit summary - no need for that. Thank you. JustSomeRandomGuy32 (talk) 20:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wagner

What is your source for the jersey number to Wagner. He will likely wear #13 (like he has always done) when he is activated. Ositadinma (talk) 21:10, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On his own Wiki page, it listed 23. -DANO- (talk) 23:26, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That is an internal source and should not be used. You keep puting wrong players numbers in. I don't know why. Next time do some research. Why did you think that Wagner was not going to wear #13, when he has worn the number throughout his career. Ositadinma (talk) 21:49, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Darko - 31

[3] - someone should block you for stupidity.... Can't check the website? Blahblah32blahblah (talk) 02:04, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:0016t.jpg

File:0016t.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Alico Arena.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Alico Arena.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 07:07, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Roster templates

Because I can't confirm your source. Would you mind if you gave me an URL to the source where you found those numbers. Ositadinma 21:38, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There probably not wrong, but it is a print source which I don't have the magazine, you need a source which people can access. I don't know weather you are telling the truth or not since I don't have the magazine, not verifiable. Ositadinma 02:41, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You can do that, and put it in a file on the internet to see, or you can just wait till MLB.com updates their rosters. Your choice. Ositadinma 22:32, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's the link, but can't find the inside contents on the site.-DANO- (talk) 22:37, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You can't expect people to buy it, have to have inner contents, but thanks for the link. Ositadinma 15:12, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Dshibshm! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Scott Cousins - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 08:50, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Juan Carlos Oviedo

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Juan Carlos Oviedo, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 03:19, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Juan Carlos Oviedo, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 03:19, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Montero/Noesi for Pineda/Campos not finalized

Please show me a source that says this trade has been finalized. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:00, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dshibshm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why was I blocked? I did NOTHING wrong! Please unblock my IP, as it's not an open proxy!!!!!!!!!!! -DANO- (talk) 15:37, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; I can't do anything without knowing your IP address. Please follow the instructions at Template:Autoblock. — foxj 15:41, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Where do I find the appropriate info? I went to the autoblock wiki site, and I don't get where the "Ip blocked?" is. Please help me. I am NOT A PROXY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!-DANO- (talk) 21:28, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|I am NOT a proxy! I didn't do ANYTHING wrong! I am adamant that everything is acceptable on my side.-DANO- (talk) 21:31, 3 March 2012 (UTC)}}[reply]

{{unblock|This was on the active block page: "The requested IP address or username is not blocked.-DANO- (talk) 21:32, 3 March 2012 (UTC)}}[reply]

Admins cannot do anything unless they have the information given by the screen that shows up whenever you've been prevented from editing, formatted in a {{unblock-auto}} request. Standard {{unblock}} will not help because it can't give all the needed information. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 22:35, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is what it says: The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be an open proxy. To prevent abuse, these proxies may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you believe you are not running an open proxy, the most likely cause is that another customer from your ISP who was previously assigned this IP address was running an open proxy. If this is the case, please request to be unblocked using the {{unblock}} template, or request administrator attention using {{admin!}} and indicate you are caught by an open proxy block. More rarely, your network equipment or that of your service provider may be misconfigured or compromised by malicious software (such as a virus). In some cases, this can be remedied by logging into the secure server. For more information, see the Wikiproject on Open Proxies and Wikipedia:Open proxies. -DANO- (talk) 22:48, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Dshibshm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

173.245.64.0/24 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · block user · block log)

Block message:

The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be an open proxy. To prevent abuse, these proxies may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you believe you are not running an open proxy, the most likely cause is that another customer from your ISP who was previously assigned this IP address was running an open proxy. If this is the case, please request to be unblocked using the {{unblock}} template, or request administrator attention using {{admin!}} and indicate you are caught by an open proxy block. More rarely, your network equipment or that of your service provider may be misconfigured or compromised by malicious software (such as a virus). In some cases, this can be remedied by logging into the secure server. For more information, see the Wikiproject on Open Proxies and Wikipedia:Open proxies.

Blocking administrator: Spellcast (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: This range of IP addresses contains exit points for the Hotspot Shield software. Please disable Hotspot Shield. --Chris (talk) 01:54, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

-DANO- (talk) 22:51, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I removed Hotspot Shield.-DANO- (talk) 05:20, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great, you can probably resume editing then. Let us know if you run into any more problems. --Chris (talk) 14:48, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed several excess unblock requests and cleaned up the one I believe is most applicable. This will bring an admin's attention to your request. Please do not add any more unblock templates until the present one is addressed. One template is sufficient for notification. Tiderolls 23:59, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:NewMarlinsStadium.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:NewMarlinsStadium.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 07:45, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Solset Inc..
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 09:39, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Solset Inc..
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! OohBunnies! (talk) 06:48, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Solset Inc..
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alexrexpvt (talk) 03:19, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Solset Inc..
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 23:45, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Roster Numbers

Just to let you know, my "Source it or stop" edit summary was directed at the IP address who continuously changed the date (and is now blocked) of the rosters without making any changes. As for the numbers issue, I'm citing WP:OSE. Just because other people cite Twitter, doesn't mean they should! I have a feeling you're right about the number- but is there a serious harm in waiting until the Yankees finish announcing NRI's and assign their numbers? Kjscotte34 (talk) 12:20, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So it was not directed at my changing numbers? I never would do that: changing dates randomly. That is stupid!-DANO- (talk) 02:04, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nope! That IP address has been a problem before with just changing the date and not changing anything on the roster, and is now blocked. Your edits were good faith edits. Kjscotte34 (talk) 10:33, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Solset Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Solset Logo.jpg, which you've sourced to Juan Cedeno. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:38, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use of File:Solset Logo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Solset Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:04, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Solset Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Solset Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:University School of Nova Southeastern Viewpoint.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:University School of Nova Southeastern Viewpoint.jpg, which you've sourced to http://uschool.nova.edu/studentsparents/publications.html. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 04:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Solset Inc..
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! EricEnfermero ^Howdy! 09:03, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How Do I re-submit it for approval?-DANO- (talk) 23:18, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I resubmitted it for you, but I still don't think you're even close to an acceptable submission. I also restored the previous decline messages; please don't remove those. They will go away once the article is actually created. You still have major referencing problems though. You need some references that prove notability. Solset needs to have been covered in significant detail by multiple reliable sources. As an example, your reference to the main page of ripeando.com doesn't even mention Solset as far as I can tell. What information are you trying to support there? Outside of the referencing, the language could use some work. There are lots of opinion statements that aren't appropriate for an encyclopedia (ex: "striving to expand", "quickly learned how to adapt well", "must have a knowledgeable and customer-oriented design staff..."). EricEnfermero ^Howdy! 03:56, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Colorful Logo of Solset.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Colorful Logo of Solset.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:09, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Solset Inc..
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! APerson241 (talk!) 13:33, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Alternate source for verification.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Alternate source for verification.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:46, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Solset Inc..
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! – GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:35, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Basic Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Basic Logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Solset Inc..
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:35, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Solset Eco Inc..
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! QuantifiedElf (talk) 20:52, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree files

Some of your uploads may be unfree. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 November 15#OTRS pending since July. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:31, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The owner already sent in written permission for me to use any graphics I have used.-DANO- (talk) 21:08, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Solset Logo.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Solset Logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:07, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The owner already sent in written permission for me to use any graphics I have used.-DANO- (talk) 21:08, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree files

Some of your files may be unfree. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 February 26#OTRS pending since December for details. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:06, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have permission directly from the owner of those pics. I can gladly give you his contact info.-DANO- (talk) 05:06, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Manuel Mayorson listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Manuel Mayorson. Since you had some involvement with the Manuel Mayorson redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Spanneraol (talk) 22:46, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Solset Eco Inc. concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Solset Eco Inc., a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Solset Eco Inc.

Hello Dshibshm. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Solset Eco Inc.".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Solset Eco Inc.}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:00, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dshibshm. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Your recent editing history at Miami Marlins shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. BilCat (talk) 02:17, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:New Cleveland Indians Cap Logo.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Miami Marlins Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Miami Marlins Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Miami Marlins Primary Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Miami Marlins Primary Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:40, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:New Cleveland Indians Cap Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New Cleveland Indians Cap Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Indians new cap insignia.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Indians new cap insignia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Miami Marlins, you may be blocked from editing. BilCat (talk) 22:18, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Slight tweak.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Slight tweak.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marlins Hat.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Marlins Hat.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marlins Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Marlins Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:New Marlins Uniforms.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:New Marlins Uniforms.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 07:00, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:New Marlins Uniforms.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:New Marlins Uniforms.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NatureBoyMD (talk) 14:55, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marlins Cap Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Marlins Cap Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marlins New Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Marlins New Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Updated Indians Uniforms.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miami Marlins Uniforms.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Miami Marlins Uniforms.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Miami Marlins Uniforms.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Updated Indians Uniforms.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Updated Indians Uniforms.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:03, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Indians script logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Indians script logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Cleveland Indians uniforms.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Cleveland Indians uniforms.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Larry Hockett (Talk) 05:22, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indians 2019 uniforms.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Indians 2019 uniforms.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Larry Hockett (Talk) 10:03, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:New Marlins 2019 Uniforms.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New Marlins 2019 Uniforms.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:41, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jose Fernandez number retirement

Please stop reverting edits that take Jose Fernandez' number out of the Miami Marlins info box. The number, while it has not been worn by another player since his death, has not officially been retired by the team. The team's owner has stated an intent to do so, but it has not yet officially been done. Therefore, we do not list it in the team's article. Strikerforce^Talk 14:52, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bryce Harper

Don't do that again. We wait for confirmation from THE TEAM. We haven't gotten that yet. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:43, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Mandela Effect (movie) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Mandela Effect (movie), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 06:54, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mandela Effect Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mandela Effect Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I meant that this current article is where the pic is used.-DANO- (talk) 03:57, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Mandela Effect (film) (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:The Mandela Effect (film) may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:44, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dshibshm! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 02:44, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you keep the draft still available, so I can modify it to comply with the Wikipedia rules?-DANO- (talk) 00:46, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

                      Where can I access it, so I don't have to start all anew?-DANO- (talk) 00:46, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can lodge a request to have the draft article restored here. The key issue is that in the draft you have cut and paste text directly from a source - which is a copyright infringement. Something that is strictly enforced on Wikipedia. If you are granted permission to have the draft article restored you will need to remove all the copyrighted material or face the article being deleted again. Dan arndt (talk) 01:46, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Mandela Effect Movie Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mandela Effect Movie Logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 06:24, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Mandela Effect Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mandela Effect Logo.jpg, which you've attributed to https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6544220/?ref_=tt_rt. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 06:26, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:New Phillies logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New Phillies logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of Just the Ten of Us characters moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of Just the Ten of Us characters, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 23:56, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Just the Ten of Us characters (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No sources cited at time of review.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Just the Ten of Us characters and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Just the Ten of Us characters, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 02:07, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Just the Ten of Us characters

Hello, Dshibshm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Just the Ten of Us characters, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of Just the Ten of Us characters

Hello, Dshibshm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Just the Ten of Us characters".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:10, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of Just the Ten of Us characters

Hello, Dshibshm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Just the Ten of Us characters".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:41, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]