User talk:Ds3kah

Cdigix Changes ---

Removed and edited entire page as the company has undergone significant changes, and 90-95% of the page no longer applies. All information that is currently on the page is in desperate need of help, with new information put in. I would have thought the differences in content would have explained the changes at the company.

Cdigix

Please don't copy material from other websites. We can't accept the text for copyright reasons, and the text that you inserted is very promotional. Also, criticism sections shouldn't disappear entirely. While it should probably be rewritten or merged more effectively (since this criticism isn't particularly damning or meriting an entirely different section), the section shouldn't be wiped out because it's still historically relevant.-Wafulz (talk) 21:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Tristan Evans

A tag has been placed on Tristan Evans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ros0709 (talk) 00:05, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Theupsidedownsilverwindsample.ogg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Theupsidedownsilverwindsample.ogg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 23:02, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Ds3kah! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Sarah Jane (keyboardist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Brett Kron - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jsun Atoms - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 15:41, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Promo TWBW 200.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Promo TWBW 200.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:07, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]