User talk:Drnoble

AfC notification: Draft:Morlais has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Morlais. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:12, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Morlais (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It looks like this is still WP:TOOSOON - where's the independent coverage here?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Morlais and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 00:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Drnoble! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! asilvering (talk) 00:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing my draft. I've updated the article a bit, and asked for further guidance over at the teahouse. Drnoble (talk) 12:17, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Morlais tidal power station has been accepted

Morlais tidal power station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

F.Alexsandr (talk) 10:10, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tidal Power

Good idea. Not an expert, just interested. Visited Rance Tidal Power Station about 1985, did the tour. I think that they have problems with silt reducing capacity. BlueWren0123 (talk) 12:40, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I found my copy of the green Guide Michelin for Bretagne Ed 1975 ISBN 2-06-100-150-5. It has a piece on Rance (Vallee de la) P156-157 including the Usine maremotrice de la Rance.BlueWren0123 (talk) 03:26, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also https://arena.gov.au/knowledge-bank/tidal-energy-in-australia/. Good acronym, shame about lack of progress.BlueWren0123 (talk) 13:00, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nova Innovation has been accepted

Nova Innovation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette ^{(Merry Christmas, and a happy new year)} 12:32, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing and accepting my draft, it makes me more confident to edit going forward. Hope you have a good festive break and all the best for the new year @ToadetteEdit Drnoble (talk) 12:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marine Current Turbines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Fraenkel. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Drnoble. Thank you for your work on Aguçadoura test site. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:24, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Drnoble. Thank you for your work on CorPower Ocean. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Drnoble/Draft/Wello Penguin

A tag has been placed on Drnoble/Draft/Wello Penguin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Blethering Scot 19:29, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]