Jump to content

User talk:Drma Panjaitan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pikiran Publik (September 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Utopes were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Utopes (talk / cont) 04:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Drma Panjaitan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Utopes (talk / cont) 04:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Drma Panjaitan. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Drma Panjaitan. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Drma Panjaitan|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 03:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello good evening bro @Veracious For the page that I created, it's purely my knowledge and I'm purely not paid and I don't know the owner of the company but I'm amazed and there is really cool media to help improve news and also to be introduced in people, for the article that I wrote, I made it based on my knowledge and research and got the sources which I listed on Indonesian Wikipedia and I also looked in the category of Indonesian news websites, there were even sites that were no longer active but were not deleted quickly, they were even left alone. I made an article wanting to contribute to Indonesian Wikipedia but it always gets deleted. Honestly, I don't know what I did wrong. If I'm wrong or I'm not right, please correct me or guide me further so that I can continue to learn, isn't it that I'm broken by this enthusiasm to try new things? I see a lot of good and cool Indonesian media but there are no publications. If the page I made is not enough, I apologize and if I may, I ask that the PT Mind Public Media Network page and business unit articles that I have created be returned. I want to help. Just without any payment or anything, I think it's cool media plus it provides clear and active information, unlike other media which are no longer active but the articles are still there and haven't been followed up beforehand. That's all, I ask for guidance. and asked for the article I wrote to be returned and, if possible, corrected so that it is truly suitable for Wikipedia, bro @Veracious, sorry if it disturbed your evening bro @Veracious Drma Panjaitan Drma Panjaitan (talk) 19:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you just said it by yourself, what you did wrong is, you are creating an article because it's "cool" and want to "promote" them. Read WP:COMPANY for more, complete information. Also cc: Utopes as the reviewer
Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 08:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]