User talk:DontBlameMe

December 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to The Thrill of It All (Sam Smith album), but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Jack Frost (talk) 07:44, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Taylor Swift has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Taylor Swift was changed by DontBlameMe (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.875535 on 2017-12-13T08:48:38+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:48, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Clarkcj12 (talk) 07:09, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Nick Bateman.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nick Bateman.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 14:01, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Tomas Skolodik.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Tomas Skolodik.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 14:02, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:The 1989 World Tour Live.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The 1989 World Tour Live.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:01, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:The 1989 World Tour Live.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The 1989 World Tour Live.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Year's Day (Taylor Swift song)

Please, next time you create an article, create it over the top of the existing redirect for the song. We don't use curly quotation marks in titles for Wikipedia articles, we use straight quotes typed by most keyboards ('). For example, if you wished to create an article I Did Something Bad, you are currently redirected to the article for Reputation. Click on the blue link right at the top of the article (where it says "Redirected from I Did Something Bad") and edit the article there. Ss112 03:06, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Camila (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Divide (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Liam Payne does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Ss112 02:03, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Flicker (album). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ss112 19:00, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2018 Brits.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2018 Brits.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:03, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Reputation (Taylor Swift album), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 15:36, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2018 Brit Awards

Please do not add that Dua Lipa has the most nominations on 2018 Brit Awards, because today is the day of the ceremony and people now only care about who has the most awards, not the most nominations. Thank you. JE98 (talk) 18:35, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is the second time I have to tell you not to add Dua Lipa as the most nominated artist to 2018 Brit Awards. The show is over, and now we only care about the most wins, not the most nominations. If you add Dua Lipa as the most nominated again, you may be blocked from editing. JE98 (talk) 13:24, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Year's Day (Taylor Swift song)

You've now created two sets of articles for New Year's Day (Taylor Swift song): one is a redirect (with the proper apostrophe), and one is an article (with a non-standard-character apostrophe, against MOS:CURLY). Why would you not go back to the place you first created the article and redo it there? Why make another one? I think you need to learn the proper way to make an article and stop (unintentionally) giving admins or page movers jobs to do by creating articles in the wrong place. This could have been avoided in the first place if you had've just created your content over the top of the existing redirect for the song before it had to be moved for the first time last month. We don't capitalise the "s" in song between the parentheses, and we use non-curly apostrophes like this: '. Search using the Wikipedia search bar to see if a song or album does not already exist. If it does, and you are redirected to another article, click the small blue text at the top of the article you are redirected to (where it says "Redirected from New Year's Day (song)"), then you will be taken to that redirect that you can then edit. There you can create the article to your heart's content. Please bear this in mind before making another 10 pages for the same topic where others' redirects have to be overwritten. Thanks. Ss112 14:53, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of awards and nominations received by Taylor Swift, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sparks Fly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Myx Music Award for Favorite International Video, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sign of the Times (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Taylor Swift, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Voice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Taylor Swift - ...Ready For It?(music video screenshot).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Taylor Swift - ...Ready For It?(music video screenshot).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 02:46, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Taylor Swift - ...Ready For It?(music video screenshot).jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Taylor Swift - ...Ready For It?(music video screenshot).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 22:57, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Gorgeous Song.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Gorgeous Song.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 22:58, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Left me hangin.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Left me hangin.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 23:03, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Glen Powell 2018.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Glen Powell 2018.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 23:10, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Taylor Swift's Reputation Stadium Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wildest Dreams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit for Most Viewed Video in 24 hours

Your edit for BTS' Fake Love on the chart had an unreliable source and has been undone. Please refer to reliable sources page on Wikipedia and edit with reliable sources only in the future to save your and other Wikipedia user's time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunkizzed (talk • contribs) 13:36, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Billboard Music Award for Top Song Sales Artist, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Nervous ( song)

Hi, I'm Meatsgains. DontBlameMe, thanks for creating Nervous ( song)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Meatsgains^(talk) 00:25, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Creating articles in the right place

Hi DontBlameMe. You've been on Wikipedia for a while, so I think you know by now the correct place to create an article. As the user Starcheers pointed out to you, if you want to create a page for Shawn Mendes' song "Nervous", please do so at Nervous (Shawn Mendes song). That is the correct location, as we already have multiple songs on Wikipedia with the title "Nervous". Also, you added a space before "song" in the disambiguated title of your redirect. Surely you know Nervous ( song) is not the right place for any article to go. At any rate, please see WP:Naming conventions (music). Thanks. Ss112 06:05, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to CenturyLink Field

CenturyLink Field is a Featured article, which means it must be kept according to the FA criteria. Large tables to list concerts (a regular and non-notable event) are decidedly not what can be considered high-quality, which is why they are being phased out when articles reach GA/FA candidacy. Sounder Bruce 01:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Your recent edit to the page Reputation (Taylor Swift album) contains an edit summary that appears to have triggered the edit filter. The summary may have contained inappropriate text such as a highly repetitive character sequence, profanity, gibberish, or all-caps. Please use appropriate edit summaries to tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. If your summary did not contain such text, please report it to the false positives page and remove this message. Thank you. Raritydash (talk) 06:52, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Babe (Sugarland song)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Haroon.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Haroon.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 11:46, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reputation (Taylor Swift album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page This Is Why We Can't Have Nice Things (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Digital Songs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Out of the Woods (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on List of Adult Top 40 number-one songs of the 2010s. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ss112 09:30, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Adult Top 40 number-one songs of the 2010s.

STOP doing this every week. You do not have a source for it at that time and you have tried it for the last four weeks. You will be reverted every week until you stop. Nobody cares how much of a Taylor Swift fan you are, you wait until the source has updated. You don't update numbers without having a source on lists like this. That's the way it goes. Ss112 11:36, 24 July 2018 (UTC) (OMG THEY FINALLY KNOW I AM A TAYLOR STAN)[reply]

File:IncredibleThings.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:16, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Future&Tay.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:18, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ed&Tay.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:19, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Taylor Swift. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:34, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sweetener (album), you may be blocked from editing. Hayman30 (talk) 23:10, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:IncredibleThings.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:IncredibleThings.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Delicate (Taylor Swift song). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 20:12, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Reputation, you may be blocked from editing. Bhavik333 (talk) 10:00, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with I Did Something Bad. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:49, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DontBlameMe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DontBlameMe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Stan Twitter. JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 07:02, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 07:25, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fake certs

Please stop adding fake certs. It's considered a vandalism. ×°˜`°×ηαη¢у×°˜`°× 11:33, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You've been adding tons of fake certifications lately, may I ask why? The next time you're caught adding fake content, you'll be reported. ×°˜`°×ηαη¢у×°˜`°× 11:44, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Considering the vandalic nature of many of your edits over the past fourteen months, I had no other choice. ×°˜`°×ηαη¢у×°˜`°× 12:44, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for hoaxing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Guy (Help!) 12:54, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed some of your edits and found egregiously fake citations that are completely irrelevant to the text you added. To say this is not cool is an understatement. I see a lot of warnings above and no evidence that you are engaging with the community to improve your edits. Guy (Help!) 12:58, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Nervous ( song)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Nervous ( song). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 7#Nervous ( song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:14, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Nervous ( song)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Nervous ( song). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 2#Nervous ( song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 23:48, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]