Jump to content

User talk:Amaury

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Donald Duck)
It is approximately 6:12 PM where this user lives.

Archive Statistics

  • The numbers in the cells indicate how many total discussions there are for each year, each month, and overall.
Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total
January 12 11 0 0 0 0 0 8 13 7 17 5 3 6 0 82
February 13 35 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 8 12 10 5 2 1 104
March 11 24 0 0 1 0 42 6 13 10 8 7 4 1 4 131
April 20 25 0 1 0 0 38 6 11 14 10 14 5 2 1 147
May 23 13 0 10 12 0 15 4 18 15 7 5 1 5 0 128
June 14 4 0 1 39 0 10 6 15 14 9 3 9 4 4 132
July 20 3 0 1 14 0 18 12 13 20 16 4 2 5 2 130
August 8 34 0 0 3 0 7 12 19 13 14 4 0 2 1 117
September 8 5 0 0 0 0 9 9 6 13 5 4 7 5 3 74
October 24 5 0 0 0 0 6 21 16 10 5 1 6 8 2 104
November 11 0 0 0 0 0 4 9 7 13 9 5 3 4 5 70
December 0 9 4 0 0 0 0 5 13 18 15 8 10 6 6 3 97
Total 0 173 163 0 13 69 0 154 115 158 152 120 72 51 50 26 1,316

January 2024

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Hi Amaury, I’ve been trying to reach you over on the Alexa Nikolas wiki page. I’ve made some basic revisions and tried to document and source them. I’ve reached out via the talk page but gotten no response from you. Happy to discuss potential revisions, especially because the page has been flagged as needing more sources etc. if you revert it again, would be helpful to know why. many thanks, K KlausUlrich134 (talk) 06:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Oh wait, I realized, it is supposed to be increment when new episode airs. Sorry. I'll make sure a source proves the said statement next time. Cwater1 (talk) 17:11, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Not me, but a disgruntled IP. Bgsu98 (Talk) 10:07, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bgsu98: Thank you kindly. I watch the page, but I appreciate your message nonetheless since IPs are currently unable to post here due to an unrelated user who keeps evading their block with IPs. This person is clearly WP:NOTHERE, so I don't really have any plans on responding to them directly on the ANI thread. Amaury10:12, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Tanner Buchanan

I understand your point about a "random YT channel" isnt a valid source. But still Mr Buchanan in his own words says his full name is Tanner Emmanuel Cristobal Buchanan. So coming from his own mouth. So I think it's right to mention his full name on his wiki page. Here is an other source: https://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Buchanan,_Tanner Alleingänger (talk) 02:05, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Tiffany Espensen

A long-disputed issue at that article has been wikilinking the character of Cindy that she played in Spider-Man: Homecoming and one other related film (expanding it to Cindy Moon from Silk (comics)). I put an entry on the talk page there about a year and a half ago, and IJBall responded on that topic. Definitely miss him; IJBall knew more about the dispute than I did - I just know that when this wikilink was attempted, it would be reverted. And now an IP is claiming that IJBall's comments on the talk page, because of his block, are not valid and is deciding to go forward with the disputed wikilinking, further claiming there's no WP:CONSENSUS at all to prevent the wikilink. I'm thinking a new CONSENSUS may be needed, or the wikilink will need to stand in the future.

Anyway, here's the last few edits (including reverts by me) at the article: [1] [2] [3] [4]. What do you think? MPFitz1968 (talk) 19:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPFitz1968: I will keep a closer eye on it. Ping Geraldo Perez if he wants to keep an eye on it as well. Amaury19:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Why would you think that Big City Greens is not a Disney XD Series

There is no actual proof that Big City Greens is not a Disney XD Series, so why would you go to Wiki Fandom and visit the Big City Greens page and get your brain checked CoolBaljeetFan12 (talk) 20:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CoolBaljeetFan12: Personal attacks against other editors are unacceptable, no matter what kind of content dispute you're involved with. Knock it off. SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 23:44, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
She made me do it CoolBaljeetFan12 (talk) 23:46, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nobody made you do anything. If you intend to edit further here, you'll have to take responsibility for your own actions. SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 23:50, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nickelodeon Movies productions

Hello, Amaury. Do me a favor: Can you remove No Time To Spy: A Loud House Movie in the list, template, and more, please? It appears to be unsourced as it only aired on television and that is the source. Akhil K. (talk) 15:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Eat Predators URL

I just said that the Eat Predators page is Alexa Nikolas' website because she is the founder of the movement. Look it up online. Chidie345 (talk) 13:47, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect categorization

I came across your removal of Danger & Thunder from Category:The Thundermans while I was checking for categories emptied out-of-process. I reverted it for two reasons – the WP:ECOOP issue, and the fact that redirects are often categorized. For example, if you look at Category:Television crossover episodes, around half of its members are redirects (indicated by italics). If you think that redirects should not be categorized, please propose this as a change to existing practice, rather than removing all categories from individual redirects. jlwoodwa (talk) 16:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Editor experience invitation

Hi Amaury. I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 19:08, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Marino13 at ANI

Hi Amaury, I see that you had made an observational comment regarding User:Marino13's behaviour before, over at this archived talk thread on User talk:Geraldo Perez. So I just thought I'd let you know that I have made an AN/I report concerning that user over at this thread, in case you've got anything to add. Cheers! — AP 499D25 (talk) 05:04, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Turkey Day!

YoungForever has given you a turkey! Turkeys promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a turkey, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy Thanksgiving! — YoungForever(talk) 19:12, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the goodness of turkey by adding {{subst:Thanksgiving Turkey}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

YoungForever(talk) 19:12, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nina Dobrev

May I ask why have you reverted my edit here? She has Bulgarian nationality, by her own admission. Andro611 (talk) 15:53, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) Please read MOS:CITIZEN. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:32, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
MOS:CITIZEN is about stating ethnicity in the lede. I didn't add her Bulgarian nationality in the lede, I simply added her in a category of Bulgarian actresses (which she is). The talk page discussion said nothing about her not being a Bulgarian national, therefore I deem it is appropriate to add her into the category of Bulgarian actresses. Best regards. Andro611 (talk) 00:34, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The same thing applies to categories. Do not add it again. Amaury11:15, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Where is that stated? The MoS only refers to the opening paragraph, not categories. Why shouldn't she be in a category of Bulgarian actresses if she is an actress and possess Bulgarian nationality? Andro611 (talk) 19:23, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TheTruthAirdates socks

How don't have much experience with this one, but they seem to be only editing Spongebob, but have come across someone editing Rubble and Crew changing airdates around, https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/ICarlyFan060823Creddie. Was this the same behavior you have seen with this person. Want to check with you before I file a sock case. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 15:32, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays!

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Warning: misuse of rollback

Hi User:Amaury, I don't know if you got the message on Talk:Tanner Buchanan or not, but please: do not use rollback to revert edits that are not obvious vandalism, sockpuppet edits or anything that isn't under the valid criteria for the use of rollback.

I fail to see how diff 1, diff 2, diff 3, diff 4, diff 5, diff 6, diff 7, diff 8, diff 9, diff 10 are all correct uses of rollback under that criteria.

On the article Zoey 101, it's even worse. You edit warred with another user, by reverting their constructive change of the logo three times using rollback (diff 11, diff 12, diff 13). This could've easily resulted in loss of rollback privileges if someone had reported you to the administrators.

Diff 14, diff 15, diff 16 are correct uses of rollback, although usually you would also want to place an appropriate warning on the user's talk page regarding their unconstructive edit (e.g. for diff 16 I would've definitely sent a warning regarding adding spam links to articles).

But when it comes to reverting an edit that is constructive in at least some form of way, always try to provide an explanation why you had to revert that edit. Otherwise, the other editor will fail to see why their edits had been reverted, and just silently reverting edits without apparent reason is like a business kicking out a would-be customer who just wants to enquire about something there. — AP 499D25 (talk) 01:09, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]