User talk:Domiy

Fair use rationale for Image:20 petric ddp 300.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:20 petric ddp 300.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:53, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Petric for wiki.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Petric for wiki.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:56, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Modric.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Modric.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 06:21, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Kalinic.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kalinic.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:39, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Modric1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Modric1.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 09:20, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:20 petric ddp 300.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:20 petric ddp 300.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:02, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Petric for wiki.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Petric for wiki.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:17, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:NikolaKalinicinterviewphoto.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:NikolaKalinicinterviewphoto.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria.

If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the image is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:NikolaKalinicinterviewphoto.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Melesse (talk) 01:06, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Kanye19.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kanye19.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:07, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kanye19.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kanye19.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Prso.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Prso.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

pozdrav iz domovine

ne znam bas kako funkcionora ovo dopisivanje priko wikipedie pa cu probat ovde, vidim da si sredia kod darija srne zemlju podrjetla, ja sam zadnjih par dana pokusava prminit iz sfr jugoslavija u hrvatska ali su je ljudi konstantno vracali nazad cak i pritili mi banom, vidim da si ti nasa dobar kompromis, svaka cast

Signing talk pages

Hi Domiy, could you please remember to sign your contributions to talk pages. Although there is a bot that often scans and does it, it is much tidier if you sign. Either use four tildes ( ~ ) or the signature button on the edit toolbar. Thanks--ClubOranje^Talk 01:27, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Photomodric.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Photomodric.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:52, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:0E3658D9C4199F756F1C58.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:0E3658D9C4199F756F1C58.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Providing misleading information about image sources

Hi, please don't provide misleading information about images you "took yourself". Your image Modrictraining12 is a blatant copyright violation from [1]. I'll be watching your contributions from now on and if you continue to upload copyrighted images and provide misleading information about the source, you will eventually be banned, since Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. It it very possible to find free images of football players, just look at commons:User:Jacoplane/gallery#Football to see some that I have uploaded. Cheers, JACO PLANE • 2008-06-30 23:13

I'll look into this issue. I've emailed The Sun, and if they confirm your story I'll undelete the image. Cheers, JACO PLANE • 2008-06-30 23:38

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 03:16, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Croatia vienna.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Croatia vienna.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:36, 25 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 03:36, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Football team

Does this edit [2] indicate that you wish to withdraw your nomination? Have I misunderstood your desire to nominate the article? If yes, please leave a note at User talk:SandyGeorgia saying that you'd like to withdraw or that I made a mistake and the nomination was premature. DrKiernan (talk) 08:05, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Croatia

Just a follow up to let you know that I've removed the "foreigners" section from the Croatia national football team. There was a wide consensus against such sections, both at WP:FOOTY and on the article's talk page. Take care. BanRay 10:06, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thompson

Yes I agree that somebody need to rewrite article but in doing that he must know: "If there are many quotations, please move them to Wikiquote and place a Wikiquote template on the article to inform readers that there are relevant quotations regarding the subject." (Wikipedia:Quotations rule) --Rjecina (talk) 00:35, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About Thompson

From reading the discussion on this page, it seems like more information is needed. I'll try to help. Roibhne (talk) 12:32, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Croatia football team

Hi, I've noticed you were on a "slight rewording" spree again, and you added a new paragraph that basically boils down to trivia in the article. Please stop rewording sections of the article that have already been proofread by more experienced editors, and in the future please consult others using the article's talk page before including new information, so that you can get some feedbeck as to whether a certain piece of info is really worthy of inclusion or not. I understand that you're very enthusiastic about improving the article - which is great - but by adding every single thing you can think of, and massacring English syntax every now and then doesn't really help. No offense man, but just take it easy a bit, take a look at other team's articles and try to get a feeling for what usually gets included and what doesn't - as well as the language and expressions normally used in sports writing. Pozdrav! Timbouctou (talk) 09:12, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Croatia national football team

I will take a look at the page for copy editing as per your request. Shirulashem (talk) 00:09, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit on Croatia national football team

Nema problema :) It's a neat article, hope to see it make FA status. Gonzonoir (talk) 10:59, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2005 Azores subtropical storm

When you have a moment, could you clarify your comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2005 Azores subtropical storm? We are all a little confused by what you mean. Do you think that there should be a limit on how many FAs can be written on any given topic? You also make some references to notability, which is not really a part of the featured article criteria. As long as the article is comprehensive (and this one is) I believe that it is acceptable, but a discussion on that matter would be welcome. Plasticup ^T/C 18:11, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Inline translated refs

Yes, your example on my talk page is a perfectly reasonable way to go about it. You could also just provide the translations on the talk page, with a note that you're leaving them there in case anyone needs them. You might consider including the original text as well as the translation. After all, a few readers will understand Croatian.

As for using inline refs: It's really fairly simple. You just take the same text that you'd use for the regular citation, but instead of putting it at the end, under ==References==, you put it in the article, and put <ref> before the footnote text, and </ref> after it. (What's confusing is trying to use the citation templates for inline refs, but those are strictly optional.)

Under ==References==, with this approach, then you need to put a note to the Wiki software about listing all the refs. You can use {{reflist}} for small type, or <references/> for large type.

If it's a ref that you expect to use repeatedly, then you name it: <ref name="Some Name"> (instead of just <ref> at the beginning). Then to re-use it, you only have to put <ref name="Some Name" /> and the Wiki software will know that you want it to be the same number and citation text that you used earlier. (Note the slash at the end. Also, that's the whole thing for the subsequent uses: there's no citation text after it and no </ref> needed after it.)

Finally, if that sort of inline ref isn't your preference, then you might prefer what some people call "Harvard style" references, or Author-date-page references. For that, you skip all the <ref> stuff, and just put plain text at the end of a statement like this:

The moon is big (Smith 2008:25).

That means that you found this information in a publication written by someone whose last name is Smith, published in 2008, on page 25. Then you put a regular alphabetized list of citations at the bottom of the page, and the reader just scans down to see who Smith is if the reader is interested. This "parenthetical style" is easy to type, and it puts less clutter in the middle of your article, so some people strongly prefer it.

Remember that any complete, organized and understandable system of references is supposed to be accepted at FAC, not just the one that seems most common on Wikipedia articles. Good luck, WhatamIdoing (talk) 03:41, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eduardo

Hi. I guess you're new around here. First, there is no fixed standard for tables. The current template that is popular is in my view not particularly good or complete. Second, the table in question is not difficult to read or edit. Third, Thierry Henry, the only recent FA on a soccer player, uses a similar table. Fourth, these tables have been used for a very long time, for almost four years already. Chensiyuan (talk) 05:50, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

José Sarria FAC

Can you please provide more specific feedback regarding your objections to promoting the article? Thanks. Otto4711 (talk) 00:37, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Croatia national football team

I'll leave you an individual message rather than a reply at WT:FAC. However, regarding Croatia national football team and your bid to get it to WP:FAC, if you aren't successful this team, I would suggest at the very least getting a good peer review in and trying to get assistance from other editors by seeing the list of peer review volunteers but also listing it on the relevant project pages, particularly WP:FOOTY. It's far easier to get an article to FA status if you have gained general consensus and it's a more polished effort for it.

Also, another editor at WT:FAC suggested going to WP:GA. It's not a bad suggestion but depending on what kind of review you get there it may be a wasted effort, if you're intend to push on to another FA bid anyway. Peanut4 (talk) 09:09, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My other suggestion would also be to bite your tongue a little. I've found that certain areas of here is governed by politics. Be nice and people are nice back to you. If someone suggests changes at FAC, either simply make them or come up with a reasoned argument as to why not and it should help. Anyway like I say, GA and PR, and also seek assistance at WP:FOOTY and you should be in a much better position next time. Peanut4 (talk) 08:18, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

I would invite you to revert your blanking of my comments here Fasach Nua (talk) 14:50, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Odwalla FAC - Hoovers

In response to your suggestion about noting that subscription sites need subscriptions:

I don't have a subscription to Hoovers, and the ref I used ([3]) didn't need one and is viewable without one. Do I still need to put the note? Thanks. Intothewoods29 (talk) 22:26, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. if it is possible to view the information freely without a subscription, then no such note needs to be provided. Have a good one. Domiy (talk) 22:30, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Croatia

Hi, I know you have been doing a lot of work to get Croatia national football team up to FA status, I think you have been quite combative in the FAC discussions, but I appreciate it is difficult to get your work criticisied, if you blindly commit to WP:AGF, then you get a lot of constructive comments to work with. Images is the main area where I work, so here are a few things that you should be able to fix with relative ease:

The stadium image links to a differnt image than the one used, so is invalid, if the word stadium picture is used, the licence is also wrong, Template:Attribution should be used as the licence as I see no evidence of CC
The Slaven Bilić image has no link to source or licence, even at that I would be unsure of the valididity of something originating from a user based facebook group. You may want to look at flickr, it is a good source of free images.
The rationale for Image:Croatian first team.jpg does not indicate how it significantly increases the readers understanding, to me it looks like a load of men standing in a straight line, and I think it will be hard to justify as FU. If the author is unknown, it may fall under [4] or if it was part of a news article [5] may be appropriate.
The Image:Cro-Ger 2-0.jpg should have an OTRS tag, I assume you can provide that yourself without much effort

The relation between the 1940s team and the present isn't explicit, teams represent associations, so you need to demonstrate continuity of association. I know it sounds odd, but if you read Ireland national football team (1882–1950), there are two unrelated Ireland teams, which causes a lot of confussion, so just because a team shares a name and territory doent mean they are related. Fasach Nua (talk) 12:11, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As for your request to Fasach Nua's user talk page, it is currently unknown if this user is still active. I will reply to you thus if you and he don't mind. As for your question regarding images from Flickr: No, they are not. See WP:FLICKR for which pictures from Flickr you can upload here and which you can't. Regards So Why 07:16, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Modric

Where can I find this: "Biographies need to show current state AND past state"? Hubschrauber729 (talk) 14:46, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mate, do some asking/researching on the appropriate projects and talk pages and you will find such information. I don't keep track of all project pages I read but I know I've read it somewhere on WP before. Infobox place of birth should identify the name of the area/state/country in which the person was born, including what it was known by at the time they were born and what it is known by now. Your constant reverting of this edit is becoming very disruptive. What kind of a biography wouldn't display such accurate and significant information? Yes, Modric was born in a country which was known as Yugoslavia at the time. It must be stated that he was born in what was considered Yugoslavia, but it must also surely be stated that the part of Yugoslavia he was born in is now a Croatian independent country. Yugoslavia does not exist anymore, it never will again. Some people may not know about the political situation of Yugoslavia's breakup, so saying that Modric was born in Zadar and then in a country which some people may not know about will only cause confusion. Domiy (talk) 21:40, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Response - Odwalla FAC

I responded to your reference comment here with a question. Thanks for reviewing this FAC so thoroughly. :) Intothewoods29 (talk) 22:10, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, well SandyGeorgia has moved this discussion to Talk:Odwalla, so I thought I'd provide you with a link. :) Intothewoods29 (talk) 22:41, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Message on the talk page of User:Giano II re Palazzo Pitti

It would be polite to sign your message. Risker (talk) 05:29, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from multiple FAR nominations

From WP:FAR instructions, Nominators typically assist in the process of improvement; they may post only one nomination at a time, should not nominate articles that are featured on the main page (or have been featured there in the previous three days), and should avoid segmenting review pages. If you have further questions, please raise them on WT:FAR rather than on the individual FAR page. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:10, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Drawing your attention to some inaccuracies here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:47, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

		The Reviewers Award
		Just wanted to take the time to say thank you for your helpful (if somewhat annoying ;) reviews of Odwalla, which just recently passed FAC! I hope to run in to you again soon in the future (though hopefully not at FAC, because you're too good at spotting all the mistakes and making more work for me! ;) Intothewoods29 (talk) 06:09, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Homer Simpson

Just so you know, I've responded to your concerns. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 15:07, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Croatian top league

Hey-

I was wondering if you knew definitively whether or not the Prva HNL was fully professional, and better yet, if you had a citation one way or the other so we can get it listed properly on the sub-page. Citations are terrible to find for professional status, but if you happened to have one, we could more easily fend off AfDs down the line. If you know for sure one way or the other, though, feel free to add it or let me know and I'll do so. Thanks! matt91486 (talk) 19:38, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Bilicflickrphoto.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bilicflickrphoto.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jappalang (talk) 22:35, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image permission problem with Image:Bilicforeigntraining.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Bilicforeigntraining.jpg. I noticed that that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also Image:Sukerwikiat munich.jpg. --dave pape (talk) 19:45, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the barnstar!

The barnstar is much appreciated! And if you don't mind, I'm going to stick around the article after the peer review and try to help out with the prose. I'll also keep posting comments in the peer review (not tomorrow [Sunday, where I live], though, as I'll be gone the entire day.) Here's to (hopefully) becoming an FA! Ink Runner (talk) 03:20, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

For your vote at Roman Catholic Church. I am sorry to inform you that we failed FAC but will again be at peer review in a few weeks to sort things out. Hopefully we will make it through next time. We will be contacting all supporters and opposers of the article when we open the next peer review to hopefully get all issues addressed and hashed out before the next FAC try. Thanks again for your time and attention to this important article. NancyHeise ^talk 01:03, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Croatia Football Team

I'm doing a copyedit of the article, so if anything's unclear to me, I'll post it on the talk page or at FAC. Cheers! Ink Runner (talk) 06:19, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Domiy, I read through the FAC for Croatia national football team and was a little troubled by some of your comments. You repeatedly mentioned that if reviewers had issues they should have participated in the peer review (ex: if you really wanted to contribute some points based on your own language preference then you should have participated in the peer review and made some additional adjustements to the page yourslelf ). Please note that peer review, like FAC, is a voluntary process to get reviews. FAC reviewers are not required to participate in peer reviews, and articles are not required to go through peer review to get to FAC. Peer review is useful because it can help identify some potential issues, but it is not meant to identify every single potential issue that would prevent an article from meeting the FA criteria. The fact that no one complained about a particular issue in peer review does not mean that the issue should therefore be ignored. As the FAC instructions point out, all nominated articles are assumed to have good points, but reviewers should focus on areas in which the article does not meet the FA criteria. Reviewers are encouraged to oppose articles that they believe do not meet the criteria; once their issues are resolved, the reviewer can then change to support. I hope that you will keep these points in mind as your FAC progresses - the process becomes much easier when the FAC reviewer and hte nominator have the same understanding of what the reviewer should be doing. Karanacs (talk) 15:45, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Maksimirworldstadiums.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Maksimirworldstadiums.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jappalang (talk) 01:40, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am also raising the status of Image:MaksimirStadium.jpg for discussion at the PUI board. Jappalang (talk) 01:40, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Croatia national football team good article reassessment

Croatia national football team has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Articles are typically reviewed for one week. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.--Wehwalt (talk) 08:31, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Cheers for the barnstar Domiy - much appreciated! :D All the best with the article. Gonzonoir (talk) 11:25, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Mainkranjcar.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Mainkranjcar.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.daylife.com/photo/00TtfCQeLch0i/. As a copyright violation, File:Mainkranjcar.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Mainkranjcar.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:File:Mainkranjcar.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:File:Mainkranjcar.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:File:Mainkranjcar.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 02:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image upload

I noticed that you have uploaded many, many images with the source listed as only "fan site", and assigned a free license to all of them. Unfortunately, this is insufficient for use on Wikipedia for several reasons. For one, there is not evidence that images you find on "fan site" are free. In fact, they are most likely copyrighted, just like the majority of images found on the internet. Second, there is no evidence that those sites even own the copyright to the images. I found several photographs uploaded pretty easily on news photo services, and those photos are almost never free.

Please provide more complete source information in the future, and please do not upload images unless they explicitly state that they are copyright-free. Thanks. --Mosmof (talk) 02:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Bilicandpetric.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bilicandpetric.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:26, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Bilicargue.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bilicargue.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:27, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Bilicthere.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bilicthere.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:25, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Corluka.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Corluka.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:31, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Photomodric.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Photomodric.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:12, 31 January 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:12, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flare celebration.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flare celebration.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:13, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:First flare croatia.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:First flare croatia.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:13, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photomodric.jpg

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Photomodric.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[6][7]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because images on Wikipedia need to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License or another free license, which allow anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. —hike395 (talk) 04:05, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney edit-a-thon invitation

Sydney Meetup
Next: 13 October 2012
Last: 23 July 2012

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a classical music edit-a-thon Saturday week (13 October) in Sydney. The theme will be Music of France, to coincide with the ABC Classic FM countdown between 8-14 October. If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online during the countdown. Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/October 2012. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 10:06, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)

Sydney edit-a-thon invitation

Sydney Meetup
Next: 10 November 2012
Last: 13 October 2012

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a disability edit-a-thon Saturday week (10 November) in Sydney. If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online before, during and after the meetup. Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/November 2012. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 14:56, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)

Sydney meetup invitation: January 2013

Sydney Meetup
Next: 10 January 2013
Last: November 2012

Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Thursday 10 January 2013. Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/January 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:34, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)

Sydney September 2013 edit-a-thon invite

Sydney Meetup
Next: 21 September 2013
Last: Higher Ed Symposium

Hi there! You are cordially invited to an edit-a-thon this Saturday (21 September) in Sydney at the State Library of New South Wales (SLNSW), where you can collaborate with other Wikipedians throughout the day. Andy Carr, a senior librarian at SLNSW will also be helping out. The theme of the edit-a-thon is paralympics sports, but you are free to come along to meet other wiki contributors, and edit other topics.

If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online. Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/September 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:10, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Wikipedians in Sydney)

Invitation

There is a backstage pass coming up to be followed by an editathon in the State Library of New South Wales on 23 November. This is the first time that an Australian cultural institution has opened its doors to us in this way and will be a special opportunity because the Library is providing: one of its best rooms; its expert curators (along with their expertise and their white gloves); a newly launched website (containing new resources); and of course, items from its collection (including rare and usually unavailable material) which we can look at, learn from, and use, to improve WP articles. For example, on the chosen topic (Australia and WWI), the Library holds many diaries and manuscripts from the period.

As you can see from the Library's project page, they have connected this editathon with their own work. They have already set out a wide range of resources to make things easier for us. Please sign up on the editathon project page if you can participate either online or in person with other Wikipedians. Hope to see you there! Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 07:18, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been delivered using AutoWikiBrowser to all users in Category:Wikipedians in Sydney.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to the African Destubathon

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:48, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Domiy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Domiy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Domiy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Croatian first team.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Croatian first team.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luka Modrić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Golden Ball. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AP discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Johnuniq (talk) 04:50, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:01, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop editwarring

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 04:15, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert - gender and sexuality

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Sideswipe9th (talk) 22:57, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert - Biography of living persons

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Sideswipe9th (talk) 22:58, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]