User talk:DoctorEric

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, DoctorEric! I am Pharaoh of the Wizards and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:31, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Exodus

please don't think that the tone of my remarks in the talk section is intended as hostile - when I read them I'm aware of how they sound, but it's not my intention. Please let's engage in a fruitful discussion. PiCo (talk) 03:54, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion of the article content does belong on the article Talk page, no matter how long the thread might become (we need to allow other users the chance to comment). As for the general tack to take, the general idea is to present scholarly theories/views in proportion to how widely they're held. That's not always easy to judge, of course. But we don't need to argue cases, just present them. And so far as I can tell, the ultra-conservative view that the Exodus happened exactly as described (Hoffmeier's view so far as I can tell, probably Kitchen's too) is pretty marginal; most modern scholars would probably say that the Exodus story represents a "memory" of events back in the 2nd millenium, but that this merely provided the foundation for a literary work created in the Persian period. There are many variations on this, since nobody actually knows, nor probably ever will know.PiCo (talk) 05:13, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Comment on the Berlin page

Hi - since you edited the Berlin page within the last couple months, I'm writing to ask if you'd like to weigh in on a current content dispute that has resulted in a request for comment. The issue, simply, is whether the Berlin article should include an image of the "Buddy Bears" or not. Thanks for your time, Sindinero (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Exodus

I noticed that you had made some earlier edits to the exodus but had them reverted. I recently had the same issue. It would seem that two users are enforcing their own view of what "mainstream scholarly opinion" is on the article. The reason your edits, and mine, were reverted is not that they were wrong or that they didn't represent "mainstream opinion", but that these two users are enforcing a POV on the article. I assure you, your edits and mine were closer to "mainstream scholarly opinion" than the reversions were. If you are willing, we can work together on the article to bring some balance.(talk) 15:49, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Physician supply

A couple of comments about your Wiki entry on Physician supply. Increasing medical school slots is nice, and does in fact increase the quantity of MD and DO advanced degrees, who could go on to work for health insurance companies or law firms. However, the goal is additional Board Certified Physicians (the ones who see patients). This can only happen if Residency slots are increased, giving the opportunity to pass the boards and become a Board Certified Physician in their specialty. The politicians in my current state, Minnesota, forced the University of Minnesota to increase the medical school by about 34 a few years back (kind of an educated guess from an article I read). The problem was a bunch of new doctors who don't match to fill residency slots and become stuck in limbo. Joke: What do you call the student who finishes dead last in his/her medical school class? A: Doctor!

The other point I wanted to make is about qualified medical school candidates. Not having a diploma or Bachelor's Degree does not eliminate you from entry to medical schools, your mileage will vary though. My wife's medical school class had a guy without a Bachelor's Degree. He was a journeyman plumber just looking for the next stage in life. He did attend college to fill in the necessary coursework required - biology and stuff. Once he passed the MCAT exams with an exceptional score he applied and was admitted. Medical schools are looking for diversity in undergrad education, and don't want everyone with Pre-Med degrees. My wife's undergrad was in the college of agriculture.

Velcroman98 Velcroman98 (talk) 14:42, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments are accurate, but miss the point of my entry (i.e. some of the physician shortage in the U.S. is due to inefficiencies that limit the number of patients physicians can see and treat, not an actual lack of qualified doctors). DoctorEric (talk) 00:20, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Overy

email me at berndd11222@gmail.com and I will send you a jpg of the Overy pages. Dresden is a major portion of Overy's bumb down of the German number. regards--Woogie10w (talk) 00:02, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Overy does not mention the important point that other German sources do not include these refugees fleeing westward. In the 1958 Die deutschen Vertreibungsverluste(German Expulsion Losses), the West Germans footnote 128,000 civilian deaths in the flight from the Russians, mostly during the sieges of Konigsberg and Breslau. There is no mention of air raid deaths. I suspect that they puffed up the figure of the Allied air raid dead for political reasons by including the refugees. --Woogie10w (talk) 01:07, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, DoctorEric. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, DoctorEric. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DoctorEric. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DoctorEric. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.

While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite" click on it
Then click on "templates",
Choose the most appropriate template and fill in the details beside a magnifying glass followed by clicking said button,
If the article is available in Pubmed Central, you have to add the pmc parameter manually -- click on "show additional fields" in the template and you will see the "pmc" field. Please add just the number and don't include "PMC".

We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:33, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I find it very odd that you are criticizing my use of unreliable sources (including two pilot studies, in this case), when you reverted my edit back to a paragraph that was supported by an opinion piece in a business journal, and a textbook that was written shortly after the procedure in question came to market, before even those pilot studies had been published; I'm certain that the opinion piece doesn't meet the high-quality reliable source criteria, and even the textbook, whose chapters were probably accurate when written, is outdated in this rapidly evolving field. I'm not defending the pilot studies I cited as reliable, but I also do not appreciate "the pot calling the kettle black," as they say.

As far as giving "advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles"... Have you actually read the article you are so zealously protecting? It's a bloody mess, with outdated references (some a decade old) and outright inaccurate statements. And the specific paragraph that you are protecting is, if not strictly inaccurate, misleading, salacious, and too narrow in its focus -- it is certainly not "encyclopedia quality" writing. Again, pot and kettle. DoctorEric (talk) 18:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Jorm (talk) 18:11, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]