User talk:Djalo24

Welcome!

Hello, Djalo24, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 13:33, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

False authorship claim for Image:Inside_Temple.jpg

You uploaded Image:Inside_Temple.jpg and claimed it as your own work, but this is fraud. I, Peter J. de Bruin, am the creator of this work. The original in higher resolution is to be found on my photo site, the camera identified in the image metadata is my camera, and the people on the image are friends of mine.

I am not pleased with this. You could have asked me. I would be willing to release the image to the public domain, but I would have asked permission of the people appearing on the picture. The image has already been dispersed on the net, so that would be useless now.

Don't know what to do now. Peter J. de Bruin (talk) 22:10, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:456MandalaA.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:456MandalaA.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:04, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:161 th.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:161 th.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:04, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Circle1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Circle1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:05, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Licursi3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Licursi3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:08, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Piana degli albanesi, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://sicilia.indettaglio.it/eng/comuni/pa/pianadeglialbanesi/pianadeglialbanesi.html. As a copyright violation, Piana degli albanesi appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Piana degli albanesi has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Piana degli albanesi. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Piana degli albanesi, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Benon 19:22, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arbëríshte

Hi, I think your new page at Arbëríshte doesn't make too much sense in this sub-stub form. I think we should turn it into one of the following:

A redirect to Arbëreshë (the Italian group)
A redirect to Arvanitic language (the Greek one)
A disambiguation page linking to both of these two.

Which would you prefer? Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:12, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Dargah.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dargah.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

Hi.

Arbëríshte IS actually the name of the language that the Arberesh people speak, it is my mother tongue and I would like to correct the erroneous definition of "Arberesh" as a language, it is not.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:26, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Dances.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dances.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:59, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Guru_Ravidass.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Guru_Ravidass.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ravismall.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Ravismall.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:43, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arbërishte

Hi, thanks for your note. Now that you've expanded it into an actual article, that's absolutely fine with me. Thanks for your work! There's just a few technical points we'll have to work out. First, spelling: Last time I think you were using the spelling Arbëríshte (with an accent and a final -e), which is still a redirect to Arbëreshe right now. Your new article is at Arbërisht. Which spelling do you prefer? With or without the "ë" with diaeresis? With or without the acute on the "í"? With or without the final "-e"? Or is the final "-e" actually also an "-ë"? That's eight possible variants, or sixteen? We should make sure that the article itself is at the best spelling (I personally would guess Arbërisht is just fine), and then make redirects from all the possible variants.

A second point is the relation in scope between your Arbërisht article and the already existing Arvanitic language article. Right now, your text makes it sound as if both were actually the same thing - but if that was the case, we should only have a single article for both. My suggestion is we should reword it to make it clear that your new article really deals only with the dialects in Italy, but that the same name is also used as one of the native names of those in Greece, and that both are of course very similar but have seperate articles (for sociopolitical reasons). Would that be okay with you? If you want, I can take care of making the necessary links and disambiguation tags.

Please let me know if you want any help, and welcome again! Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:44, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Made a few modifications along the above lines. Hope that's okay with you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:21, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and by the way, I see all those copyright warnings above. Please do take these seriously, as Wikipedia has a policy of being very strict about respecting copyright. Please take some time to study the relevant policies. Don't hesitate to ask me if you have any questions about how to make sure your pictures and texts don't get deleted. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:30, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Arbërisht is actually correct, the í is for pronunciation but isnt needed. About rewording it to make the distinction between Greek Arberisht and Italian Arberisht, yeah go ahead! Thank you

Hi, I have moved the article on your language to Arbëresh language. Is that OK? --Tēlex 22:45, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If I can I introduce my opinion, I remember an arbereshe writer who spoke of his language ("la lingua del cuore" "the language of the heart", he called it), he called it arbereshe. Even if they identify quite a lot with Albanians in general, and often simply call their language Albanian. --Aldux 23:28, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Ravidasi_Symbol.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Ravidasi_Symbol.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:47, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Dargah01.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dargah01.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:14, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Image2078.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Image2078.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:30, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Katwijk_Khanqah.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Katwijk_Khanqah.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU≈talk 00:34, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Baba Boota Singh

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Baba Boota Singh, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. The Sunshine Man 17:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Niranjan Nirakar Swaroop

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Niranjan Nirakar Swaroop, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. 66.241.130.106 02:23, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Camp05 handsonshoulders.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Camp05 handsonshoulders.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:19, 25 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 72.88.37.67 (talk) 13:19, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Mainsymbol.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mainsymbol.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --B (talk) 02:20, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Would You like to Help?

Hi, I am starting Wikipedia:WikiProject Ravidassia. I would like to get help from people who are interested. You may sign up for the project on the [[1]]. McKinseies (talk) 14:07, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Pianalbanesi.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pianalbanesi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:40, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sach Khand

The article Sach Khand has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources provided to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 02:08, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Niranjan Nirankar Swaroop for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Niranjan Nirankar Swaroop is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niranjan Nirankar Swaroop until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 17:02, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Spirit of Guidance

The article Spirit of Guidance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Esoteric and hopelessly unencyclopedic material

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iskandar323 (talk) 22:01, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shri Guru Ravidass Mission London

The article Shri Guru Ravidass Mission London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Apparently minor local charity, no sources since 2009.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Belbury (talk) 15:11, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]