User talk:DirtyDurg1

A page you started (Tilly Keeper) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Tilly Keeper, DirtyDurg1!

Wikipedia editor Thursby16 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

good

To reply, leave a comment on Thursby16's talk page.

DirtyDurg1, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi DirtyDurg1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tilly Keeper

The article Tilly Keeper has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NACTOR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 18:02, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Cheryl Fernandez-Versini. Thank you. livelikemusic talk! 13:42, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Andy Sugden with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Laber□^T 18:11, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eddie Jordan

Hi DirtyDurg1. I've started a discussion regarding the most appropriate title for the Eddie Jordan (commentator) article. You are welcome to participate at Talk:Eddie Jordan (commentator)#Article title. Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 20:36, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, controversial moves should be discussed with WP:RM, and "Other people exist with this same" is not necessarily a reason to move it. Also, Jordan has never been a commentator, so your disambiguation makes no sense. Joseph2302 (talk) 06:29, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Spidey17.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Spidey17.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:21, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ted Reilly

The article Ted Reilly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely fails notability, just an extra with no award nominations working on a day time soap..

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ste moc 13:34, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tilly Keeper

The article Tilly Keeper has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

another actor that completely fails WP:NACTOR, only 13 episodes of a day time soap, some have not even aired..

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ste moc 13:40, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peyton List (actress/model) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Peyton List (actress/model). Since you had some involvement with the Peyton List (actress/model) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:44, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Nut Job. SummerPhD^v2.0 16:49, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tilly Keeper for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tilly Keeper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tilly Keeper until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ste moc 01:55, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ted Reilly for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ted Reilly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Reilly until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ste moc 17:00, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]