User talk:Dirkstanley

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! -- Runcorn 22:34, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lark Street

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Lark Street, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Lark Street. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. TheRingess 08:08, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SibNet

A tag has been placed on SibNet, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:SibNet. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Leebo⁸⁶ 06:35, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please understand that the tag for speedy deletion is not a comment on the subject, but it's simply a standard process of removing articles that do not justify why the subject is worthy of being on Wikipedia. These standards can be found here. Typically, the subject needs to be the focus of multiple non-trivial written publications. Then these need to be cited in the article. If SibNet meets these standards, please place {{hangon}} at the top of the article (without removing the speedy deletion tag). Leebo⁸⁶ 06:46, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, there's a Sibnet article and a SibNet article... I only tagged SibNet, but someone else has tagged Sibnet. I'm sorry, but I don't think that the deletion can be postponed without fulfilling the criteria I mentioned above. It sounds like a nice group, and I'm sorry to hear that it may be going down, but unfortunately Wikipedia is not the right place for it. Leebo⁸⁶ 07:02, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of John A. Hartford

A tag has been placed on John A. Hartford, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Blair - Speak to me 04:34, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hartsdale, NY

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Hartsdale, NY do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --24fan24 (talk) 21:59, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Healthcare Informatics Dictionary

The article Healthcare Informatics Dictionary has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WikiProject articles should not be in articlespace but instead in WPspace

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. elektrik SHOOS 16:02, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Healthcare Informatics Dictionary has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Blue Rasberry 16:21, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dirkstanley. You have new messages at Novangelis's talk page.
Message added 16:47, 9 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clinical Staff Schedules

The article Clinical Staff Schedules has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced and not WP:notable. What is different to any other sort of staff schedule

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 17:20, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clinical Patient Education Modules

The article Clinical Patient Education Modules has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced definition. Not an encyclopaedia entry

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 17:22, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clinical Staff Education Modules

The article Clinical Staff Education Modules has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced definition. Not an encyclopaedia entry

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 17:22, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clinical Documentation

The article Clinical Documentation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced definition. Not an encyclopaedia entry

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 17:22, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clinical Order Sets

The article Clinical Order Sets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced definition. Not an encyclopaedia entry

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 17:22, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clinical Policies

The article Clinical Policies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced definition. Not an encyclopaedia entry

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 17:23, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clinical Order Sets

The article Clinical Order Sets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

still unsourced - the references given do not contain the term

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 00:29, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to get this up-and-running... Can we rename then "Clinical Order Sets" to "Order Sets"? Dirkstanley (talk) 12:38, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clinical Protocols

The article Clinical Protocols has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Dictionary definition at best

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 00:31, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clinical Templates

The article Clinical Templates has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced, not notable, dictionary definition at best

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 00:31, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clinical Procedure Document

The article Clinical Procedure Document has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable. Dictionary definition at best. what distinguishes this from any other procedure definition. Unsourced.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 00:32, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of OSUNY

The article OSUNY has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP: GNG. I found a couple mentions in some books, but nothing more.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HyperAccelerated (talk) 05:59, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]