User talk:Dickonlandia

September 2022

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to 2022 Atlantic hurricane season, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 05:47, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because of the Hurricane Danielle was the category 1 was not strongest hurricane but Tropical Storm Alex was a strong tropical storm than Danielle.... Dickonlandia (talk) 07:03, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the note to the right of "Alex"? It states that the "strongest storm" is by the lowest barometric pressure. Which Alex apparently was. I would suggest you ask on talk:2022 Atlantic hurricane season. Might ask for a source for that. I'm sure someone would help you there. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 07:41, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We can't add topic from the talk in wiki, Danielle is strong than Alex before it will speed to 125 km/h. After Hurricane Danielle, it was 95 km/h of wind speed. When Alex, it was left the strongest storm.

Not to be confused with StopBoi. Dickonlandia (talk) 08:36, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the note regarding Alex v Danielle? It states: The "strength" of a tropical cyclone is measured by the minimum barometric pressure, not wind speed. Most meteorological organizations rate the intensity of a storm by this figure, so the lower the minimum pressure of the storm, the more intense or "stronger" it is considered to be. The strongest winds were actually from Hurricane Danielle, at 75 mph (120 km/h) Adakiko (talk) 19:51, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alex: 70 mph.

Danielle: 75 mph.

Tropical Storm Alex was stronger than Danielle, They will replace soon. Dickonlandia (talk) 22:43, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Putin announced partial mobilization in Russia

Please add your sources. Xx236 (talk) 12:26, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What should I Add? Dickonlandia (talk) 12:32, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Links to your sources. Xx236 (talk) 12:56, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources Dickonlandia (talk) 13:21, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Putin announced partial mobilization in Russia

Hello, Dickonlandia, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Slatersteven, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Putin announced partial mobilization in Russia, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Putin announced partial mobilization in Russia.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Slatersteven (talk) 12:41, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You should add a content. Dickonlandia (talk) 12:43, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Putin announced partial mobilization in Russia

A tag has been placed on Putin announced partial mobilization in Russia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

A10: Recently created article that duplicates an existing topic. This should have been speedy deleted as A10 before it was redirected (see my comment on the open AFD). R3 possibly applies too.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WJ94 (talk) 15:58, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Putin announced partial mobilization in Russia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Putin announced partial mobilization in Russia, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Putin announced partial mobilization in Russia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Hello, Dickonlandia,

I wasn't pleased with your edit summary on the Draft:Hurricane Orlene (2022), making accusations against another editor and earlier making odd comments on their talk page. You are very, very new here as an editor on Wikipedia, please respect the fact there you are working with editors who have been active on this project sometimes for other a decade, who are very experienced while you are not. You have a lot to learn and making snide comments about other editors or being disruptive relects poorly on you and if you persist, could result in a loss of editing privileges.

If you have questions about editing on Wikipedia or its policies, please bring them to the Teahouse where experienced editors can offer you advice, information and support. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the report. Dickonlandia (talk) 02:17, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dickonlandia Right; you are telling another user that they "are blocked". That was incorrect; they were not blocked. As @Liz says, maybe you intended to threaten, but it seems that your understanding of word tenses in English is not quite good enough to properly threaten (which you should not do anyway).

Also, you completely misunderstood the request by @Xx236 earlier in this talk page when they asked you to "add your sources". You added a link to the definition of what a reliable source is. That is not at all what Xx236 was requesting.

In the (first) section above on Putin mobilization, you said "You should add a content". I'm not sure what you meant by that. If you were asking @Slatersteven to add content (not "a content") in order to help keep the article, well, that is confusing -- Slatersteven apparently thinks the article should go away, rather than be kept, so your suggestion is not logical for him to follow.

Maybe you would have more success working in the Wikipedia for your native language, which, I'm guessing, is not English. Good luck. David10244 (talk) 08:36, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes (Dickonlandia) you are not being clear, and that will make it difficult to either advise you or talk with you. Please read wp:cir. Slatersteven (talk) 11:19, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User page is not

See WP:UP for what is OK for User pages. What you have on your User page is not OK. David notMD (talk) 10:15, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Drdpw

What all had Drdpw done that you felt it necessary to warn them that they could be blocked for further such edits? —C.Fred (talk) 17:27, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They auto-edit.... Dickonlandia (talk) 01:03, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What does "auto-edit" mean? David10244 (talk) 07:24, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting Dickonlandia (talk) 07:35, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 09:35, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Тайфун Майсак

Hello, Dickonlandia

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Slatersteven and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Тайфун Майсак, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 8#Тайфун Майсак.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Slatersteven (talk) 10:25, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]