Jump to content

User talk:Diana Stephens

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi, Eugene Schoenfeld contacted me with a few details he wanted corrected. His book about Natural Foods and Unnatural Acts was actually published in 1974, not 1967, the mistake coming from the fact that some of the material had been previously published. Also, I was missing "c" in Schoenfeld at the bottom, I think he is referring to his website, and someone was offended because LIVE 105 was not mentioned as one of the local radio stations that had his radio show. If we could fix those mistakes, he would be much happier, but I couldn't figure out how to do those edits myself. Thanks, Diana


Hello, Diana Stephens, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 23:22, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

SwisterTwister talk 23:22, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eugene Schoenfeld (September 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Happysailor was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- Happysailor (Talk) 10:49, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Diana Stephens, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - Happysailor (Talk) 10:49, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eugene Schoenfeld (September 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Happysailor was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- Happysailor (Talk) 16:16, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eugene Schoenfeld (September 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 03:10, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eugene Schoenfeld (September 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 23:22, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eugene Schoenfeld has been accepted

[edit]
Eugene Schoenfeld, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 23:55, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Judy (Clavir) "Gumbo" Albert (January 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Judy (Clavir) "Gumbo" Albert, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 01:18, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Judy Gumbo has been accepted

[edit]
Judy Gumbo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:24, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting comments for Judy Gumbo

[edit]

Just a few minor things:

  • Don't forget to bold the first appearance of the subject's name
  • Make sure the footnotes immediately follow the facts they support (don't skip a line)
  • Don't forget to WP:Wikilink to other names, places, technical terms.

I've fixed most of these for you, so check out the difference. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:31, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

[edit]
It's so great to see an article about Judy Gumbo in Wikipedia. Thanks for writing it! JSFarman (talk) 21:48, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Diana Stephens. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Judy (Clavir) "Gumbo" Albert, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 04:02, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]