User talk:Dhilinraju

Dhilinraju, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Dhilinraju! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Please unblock me

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Wrench solution, you may be blocked from editing. Daiyusha (talk) 09:19, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Wrench solution, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. bonadea contributions talk 09:59, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

ok.ok — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.133.248.6 (talk) 10:05, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dhilinraju (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please unblock me !TonyBallioni This is cruel.I already contributed many things in wikipedia.I made another account not to again make "wrench solution" but just to save it ,and whenever company get notability it will be easy for me to publish it.But anyhow it got published by mistake,not knowingly

Decline reason:

It's against Wikipedia policy to use multiple accounts to edit the same topic. Here, it looks like you used multiple accounts to create separate drafts about the same company. This is disruptive because with multiple accounts, you are making it seem like there are multiple people in control of the accounts. Mz7 (talk) 09:05, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Help me!

Please help me with my account blocking.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhilinraju (talk • contribs)

Use the unblock template as per before, but it's unlikely you'll be unblocked. RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} 07:37, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

please unblock me, please

please unblock me, I need to contribute for Wikipedia

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dhilinraju (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

please unblock me now, I have already contributed, because of using 2 accounts, I got blocking, now its more than 8 months, please let me contribute. I will do it nicely, please help

Decline reason:

The length of time you have been blocked for is irrelevant - this block is indefinite, meaning that it will not be lifted until you indicate that you understand the problem with your behaviour and the reason you were blocked, explain what you will do to avoid this in the future, and give an indication of the areas in which you intend to edit. I can, if you wish, post this appeal to the administrators' noticeboard for consideration under the standard offer, but if you are not unblocked as a result of a discussion there then you will be considered de facto banned by the community - meaning that an administrator cannot unblock you without a full community discussion. Yunshui ^雲_水 06:48, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dhilinraju (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I know I have been blocked, but at least i need a chance this time because i understand i got block because i used two account for creation of a page. I was new to Wikipedia, and now I completely understand the working of wikipedia, also my one work got approved earlier, so i will not do the mistakes again, I just need to edit some wrong data especially film sector, if anything wrong written on posts, so for this reason, i need to get unblocked, please dont reject me again and again, if any mistakes happens again and again, please ban me. Its my word please unblock me

Decline reason:

You show absolutely no understanding of why you were blocked. Explain what you did wrong, explain why you did it, and convince us we can trust you not to do it again. Otherwise, you will lose access to this talk page. Yamla (talk) 11:59, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dhilinraju (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

@Yamla , As an SEO i tried to make company page "wrench solutions" and got rejected many times due to less notability. So i thought making again a page from another account would make a good value for "wrench solutions" to enter in wikipedia. And i made again from other account and that too got rejected and eventually my account got blocked due to the disruptive edits. This is the thing that happened. Before this happens meanwhile, I made a film page "johny johny yes appa" a malayalam film and it got approved, so i understood about "notability". Now i completely understood complete criteria and rules of wikipedia , what not to do and what to do, because Wikipedia is intended for free and genuine data. If you can unblock me , i can contribute again what is beneficial for Wikipedia and people not for any personal benefits. Above said things are 100 percent genuine. If you can help pls unblock

Decline reason:

I'm half inclined to withdraw your ability to make further appeals, but will give you one, and only one chance to demonstrate that you have "completely understood complete criteria and rules of wikipedia". Please answer the following two questions:

1. Why did it take you four appeals to admit you were using multiple accounts for SEO purposes?
2. Why is it harmful to Wikipedia to perform SEO here? Answer with reference to this site's purpose.
3. Why do we consider your acts to be very dishonest?

I am also concerned about your proficiency in written English and expect your answers to meet the standard for contributing here constructively. MER-C 13:25, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dhilinraju (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

MER-C You people are just making fun around me. I don't want to be any more here, and your questions, go ask yourself. And this ban is nothing for me, I can still make another account and use from other location if necessary, so what's the point of the ban here. I have told everything in my previous reply if you are a person with some sense you will understand. No point in appealing anymore and I will not do it.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:46, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:46, 26 August 2019 (UTC)