User talk:Destitute

License tagging for Image:Uclalibrary.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Uclalibrary.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Help me

{helpme|I created this image myself and I release it into the public domain. What is User:OrphanBot going on about?}

See, what he means is you you need to have a copyright on pictures, otherwise they can get deleted very quickly. And also, he just wanted to let you know that you uploaded an image. Just think of that next time. Have any other questions please go to my talk page. Any time you need help again, feel free. 4myself 4 18:55, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, OrphanBot automatically searches for and labels images that have no image copyright tag. When the bot found the image, the image page had no tag yet. Cheers, --KFP (talk | contribs) 19:01, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This message is the same one you received on 1 March, which you sorted then and the image is currently tagged as being PD. This page was blanked yesterday and reverted, and you probably saw the message again because of the new messages bar. In summary, nothing to worry about! matt br 19:04, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

linking library and information science

Actually, there already were links to those articles (More about library science... / More about information science...) but I guess some extra redundancy doesn't hurt. —Ruud 22:27, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed the links after I posted. Haha. Other sites also have that redundancy, as I;m sure you saw. Thanks! :) Destitute 22:32, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Library and information science

Hi Destitute. I was amazed to go away from my PC for three days and come back to find a peer reviewed and featured portal candidate with three votes of support substantially changed from its reviewed and supported form. Although I appreciate your boldness, let me implore you in the future to not to make such substantial changes to a portal so far along in that process without at least attempting some discussion first. I don't mean to be over-protective, but I've put a ton of energy into taking this totally neglected, sorry-looking portal and transforming into what is likely to be a featured portal soon, so I want to make sure that it maintains its standards.

That said, I am most appreciative that someone else is interested in contributing and doing so with apparent good faith. So I'll work with the changes you made and push forward with a mentality of collaboration. Fair enough?

To wit, some things I'm going to go ahead and clean up, particularly some formatting within selected articles and the selected picture. Note, for example, that you should take any footnotes/references out of the copied-and-pasted selection text. Take a look at other changes that I make to see the kinds of things I'm concerned about. Having been through a successful featured portal candidacy already, I'm pretty familiar with the standards and what reviewers look for.

The changes to the intro section have largely been reversed, but those appear to have been the work of another editor who I will contact separately.

My main concern now is with the completely redone topics area. Very ambitious and generally, I think it works fine and is a step in a positive direction. A few comments. The main one is that, because of the abundance of topics (some of which I think are stretching the boundaries of relevance - actually maybe if you just explained the Institutions section for me...), it's too large in the current font size. Let's see if we can make a suitably legible version in a reduced font size. The other problem is that moving it to the bottom leaves fairly imbalanced column lengths. I will try to work that out myself, but it's one of those things to consider.

Anyway, sorry to ramble so. You are welcome to respond to various points here, as I'll watch your talk page. The portal talk page is also appropriate, if you prefer to take up the conversation there. Cheers and keep up the good work. Planetneutral ^talk 01:28, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First, Planetneutral, let me say that I adore all you have done for this portal. I would also like to thank you VERY much for reversing the edits made by Ruud Koot, which didn't make sense to me. I didn't say anything because I could see I wouldn't win that battle. However, to his credit, he's usually very good and hawkish about vandalism and unnecessary things done to wikipedia, especially in information science.

As for the topics area, I know it was a bold move. I'm sorry for any over-reaching on my part. I was looking at Portal:mathematics and got jealous. I liked the way its topic section looked. :) Please make any corrections you see fit. No need to discuss it with me. I trust your decisions. I agree that "Storage/ retrieval" is quite long. I wondered if I should narrow it down, and I probably should have. I did a section on institutions because there are so many scholars in information science that focus on a particular institution in their research. Feel free to replace it with something else.

Again, thanks! Destitute 01:41, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for the response. I'll probably start some tune-up work tomorrow. One thing you should know is that we can't use copyrighted/fair use images on the portal page (or anywhere else outside the article namespace), so we'll probably lose some of the pictures in the selected bios. One of the reasons I hadn't added some of those folks was that I was hoping to find usable images first. Not really a deal-breaker though and they're still good bio/article choices. Anyway, I hope I've not dissuaded you from ongoing contribution to this portal with my comments 'cause, quite frankly, it's much more fun to collaborate and I'm glad someone else cares. Planetneutral ^talk 02:00, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not dissuaded. I'm on board. I don't have your experience, so you'll probably have to tell me where I go wrong. :) Destitute 02:17, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:DPLlogo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:DPLlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:06, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Clarklibrary.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Clarklibrary.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ALTON .ıl 04:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Kogodlogo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kogodlogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 20:28, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deserved

		The Chain Barnstar of Recognition
		For making a difference! This Barnstar isn't free, this is a chain barnstar, as payment please give this star to at least 3-5 others with 500+ edits but no barnstar. So that everyone who deserves one will get one Pseudoanonymous 20:04, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you have much more than 500+ please don't be offended; I am thinking about

The Chain Barnstar of Merit: 1500+
The Chain Barnstar of Diligence: 2500+
The Wikipedian's Chain Barnstar of Honour: 5000+

or even

The Wikipedian's Chain Barnstar of Eliteness: 10 000+

But I have to make them first Pseudoanonymous 20:04, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:LClogo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:LClogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:46, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Washingtonsemester.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Washingtonsemester.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:49, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AUliblogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:AUliblogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:48, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CLAPLlogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:CLAPLlogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:16, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jasis.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Jasis.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:23, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LCPlogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:LCPlogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:46, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SPAlogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:SPAlogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Alalogosmall.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Alalogosmall.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AUSOClogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AUSOClogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AUlogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AUlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CASlogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:CASlogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cialogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Cialogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Greenberglogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Greenberglogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Katzenlogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Katzenlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lapllogo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Lapllogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:54, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:UCLAIS.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:UCLAIS.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 20:42, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:Image-powelllib.JPG

Image:Image-powelllib.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Powell Library, UCLA (front view).jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Powell Library, UCLA (front view).jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 22:51, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Destitute! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 44 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Sue-Ellen Case - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:47, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AUlogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AUlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hugahoody (talk) 21:16, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:AUSOClogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:AUSOClogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Arch above the entry to Powell Library, UCLA.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:12, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Arch above the entry to Powell Library, UCLA.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Arch above the entry to Powell Library, UCLA.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Katzenlogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Katzenlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:27, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]