Jump to content

User talk:Dennis Brown/Archive 19

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 15←Archive 17Archive 18Archive 19Archive 20Archive 21→Archive 25

Carrot Lord

Can someone block carrot lord, both demiurge and I have had to remove a number of personal attacks [1]. He's made it clear that he doesn't intend to be editing here constructively in the future. Ryan Vesey 13:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

  • I've left a final warning; surprisingly, I don't think he's gotten one before. As always, anyone should feel free to block immediately if they think it necessary; otherwise, let me know if he makes more attacks, and indefs will ensue. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 17:20, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
  • I see it was run but no master was listed. It would be helpful to know which master you are referring to, since I see a few possibilities. I can't do much without knowing who TC ran the check against, exactly. I can't get into detail exactly why due to WP:BEANS. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 19:50, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

209.34.125.15

Hi Dennis, Trust you are now better and I haven't taking-up too much of your time? Can I please ask to to look at contributions from the above address, which appear to be vandalism - the current edit I have reverted was a unexplained deletion from the Pointe du Hoc page. It appears that in spite of repeated warnings, this account is still being used for vandalism. With best regards, David, David J Johnson (talk) 20:59, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Sockpuppet case.

Hi Dennis. Twice in December you put a block on User:Yohowithrum for sockpuppet violations. I have opened a SPI case regarding User:NickCochrane (an account created December 31) and User:LenaLeonard. Another editor has suspicions that NickCochrane might actually be Yohowithrum. Both accounts have remarkably similar article interests and the NickCochrane actually deleted comments about the now-blocked Yohowithrum's COI.[2]

As you are familiar with the User:Yohowithrum SPI, you might want to look at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NickCochrane for more details and input. Take care. --Oakshade (talk) 08:20, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

  • Since two CUs have already looked at the logs (something I can't do) I would ask DoRD or DeltaQuad to compare. They should be able to compare the IPs and/or cities of the people to see if that is a possibility. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 12:46, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Civility advice

Hi Dennis, stalkers:

I could stand some advice about how to react to this. I'm leaning towards just ignoring it (and ANI seems like overkill) but I'm also concerned that this is going to be a continuing problem. Thoughts? GaramondLethe 18:33, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

  • One of those frustrating circumstances where someone is going out of their way to say "I don't want to comment on the person" then does. I redacted the one comment and added a note. Realistically, any time you bring something to AfD and someone drags up a bunch of sources, they will often be snide about it. Still, he went beyond snide so I said something. Hopefully it wont' be a pattern with him, forcing you to ANI. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 12:56, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Dennis, thank you for your interest in this matter, although I do think you could have left my main point intact, that being that I see nothing resembling good faith - or even civility - in the actions of Garamond Lethe. --Abhidevananda (talk) 15:16, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Like I said there, comment on the merits, not the individual. That is the entire core of NPA. You might give Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement a look. It is generally accepted that staying within the top three levels is required to be considered a good faith discussion. What you did was de facto ad hominem, which is why I removed it. As for the merits, I have no opinion and my role was purely administrative. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 16:49, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 February 2013

D.B. Cooper

Hi -- Very much appreciate your temporary protection of the Cooper article. Those of us who have taken the article under our wing and do our best to maintain its FA status get pretty frustrated, sometimes, with the nonsense that some folks attempt to add. So thank you. DoctorJoeE talk to me! 15:08, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Dennis

It looks as though I will shortly be a party in an Arb Com case (Re:Richard A. Norton). The case is going to revolve around various forms of copyright violation committed in past years, a significant amount of which has been deleted or revision-deleted during the Contributor Copyright Investigation which began in November 2011. I find myself needing — temporarily, for the duration of the case — the ability to read deleted files in order to do forensic analysis of the total of this material.

I have been informed on Jimbo's Talk Page that there is no way to obtain the ability to read such material without being vetted through the RFA process. I have absolutely no desire to be an administrator, but would like to run the gauntlet in what is hopefully a pro-forma process to obtain this capacity, promising to surrender it through resignation on the day of the closing of the case. During my initial statement I will foreswear all administrative tools: blocking or unblocking, protecting or unprotecting pages, moving files, deleting files, creating revision deletions, granting user rights, or engaging in any other administrative functions that escape me at the moment — a promise to be backed by a green light to immediately reverse these actions and block me.

As you are, in my estimation, the most widely esteemed Administrator on the site, I would very much appreciate it if you would make a co-nomination of my frequently grumpy and sarcastic self. I have asked Fram, who is the filer in the case, to co-nominate — although he and I threw a few verbal punches in the past week and may not be warm to the idea. The thing I want to achieve is to make this as uncontroversial as possible.

For an example of the forensics of which I speak, see: Wikipedia:Contributor_copyright_investigations/20111108 and the talk page Wikipedia_talk:Contributor_copyright_investigations/20111108.

Thank you for your consideration, please let me know one way or the other as soon as possible, since it's a 7 day process, as you know. —Tim Davenport /// Carrite (talk) 06:46, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

  • I will be happy to co-nom you. I haven't done a full look at your contrib history, but I've seen you around for years and always thought highly of you. As for "time limit" or otherwise, that is your choice, although I think you would make a good admin without the limits. As for bumping heads, one of the current candidates at RFA and I have bumped heads pretty hard in the past, INeverCry, but it didn't stop me from strongly supporting. I wouldn't write off Fram and would suggest just asking privately. Good people are going to bump heads from time to time, it is human nature. How you do it is your call, of course, and I think you greatly overestimate the esteem given me here, but I will gladly nominate you. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 14:06, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
  • I'm pretty much ready to roll, Dennis. Fram declined co-nominating, not that I blame him in the least. I subsequently asked Wifione to co-nominate, but upon further review I think it's probably best to get rolling on this ASAP since there are now 5 Arbs who have voted to take the Norton case and the glacial pace could change rapidly. Hope you're OK with being a single nominator, let me know if I should indeed round up a second... Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Carrite is the page, I haven't filled in the acceptance yet but will after you let me know it's ready for my stuff. If you think I should tweak the wording of anything on there, let me know that also. Thanks so much, Dennis! Carrite (talk) 06:56, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
      • The irony is that if you were less than honest, and just ran for admin, you would likely be passing with flying colors. You are better qualified than half the current admin. I am hoping it still passes, and personally, I genuinely respect the fact that you have been 100% honest in your intentions here. We have a bad habit of punishing honesty at Wikipedia. I understand some will oppose due to the temporary nature, and I respect that even as I disagree with their rationales. Hopefully, the greater community will see the wisdom in granting your request. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 18:34, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Wikifunctional? Wikitastic? ;-) Again, I try to assume the best of faith, and I do, even if I think some are mistaken in assuming that adminship should only be given to those willing to accept a life sentence. If I really thought I had to be admin for life, I might fake my own death. None of us should admin for life, but then, I support the idea of reaffirmation votes for admin every few years and a slightly lower bar to gain access to the tools in general. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 21:58, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Unnecessarily rude

Hi Dennis, please can you explain what was "unnecessarily rude" about following WP:NPA to the letter ("Derogatory comments about other contributors may be removed by any editor") with the edit summary, "Reverted 1 edit by Fram (talk): Rmv personal attack - WP:NPA - please tone down your edit summaries too. (TW)". That was my only edit to the page in dispute, but it does make me involved. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 14:12, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

  • I was likely over-generalizing, but the point was that the discussion was only going to go downhill, and was becoming reactionary. It wasn't meant to pass judgement on anyone, just to put the brakes on a process that no good could come from. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 14:23, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

95.15.162.199

Hello Dennis, Sorry to trouble you again, but could I please ask for your opinion on this users recent contributions to the D. B. Cooper article. He has inserted a reference to Find a Grave, when there is no evidence that this person is dead and the Find a Grave article is pure speculation - which is not Wikipedia policy. He has now reverted my edits three time, with no real reason, and also appears to be making highly speculative edits on other subjects. Your advice/action would be most appreciated. With best regards, David David J Johnson (talk) 12:32, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

  • Another admin says he blocked him, but I didn't see a block. Regardless, that is a very disposable IP so blocking wouldn't be very effective. I've instead semi-protected the page for 30 days. I would agree that findagrave.com is NOT a reliable source, as it is written by random users. Interesting, but not WP:RS qualified. That aside, (as you point out) no one is really sure who DB Cooper is anyway. I watch that page but haven't been following my watchlist nor actually done any real editing on it. I've watched a number of documentaries on DB Cooper, a very interesting story indeed, and one that doesn't need unsupported speculation here. That is the History Channel's job ;-) Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 13:43, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Dennis, Many thanks for your help. Regards, David J Johnson (talk) 14:02, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Dennis or stalkers---Help!

Would one of you fine fellas or ladies please take a look at the entry at the top of my talk page and make whatever warning to the poster you consider appropriate? I really don't want to deal with the guy. He is biting me hard for reverting his unreferenced content from Freelancer.com, which I am going to ask for RPP on. Thanks! Gtwfan52 (talk) 21:44, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Your nomination of Carrite

Dennis, I assume you're not aware of this. Would you have nominated him if you had been? Prioryman (talk) 21:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

  • I don't generally consider material that from other websites, for a variety of reasons. I have no idea what kind of identity controls, moderating, or control they have over content, nor how reliable the linkage is to users here. Not taking away or adding to your concern, but I can honestly say I've never used offwiki information in making a decision on who to nominate. Wikipediocracy isn't a site I frequent, nor do I belong to any similar sites. You can find me sometimes on slashdot and occasionally leaving a stray comment on misc blogs but that is quite rare. It is time consuming enough to just research here, doing an offwiki research, with different names and such, is really impossible to do and offsite examination fairly or adequately. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 22:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
  • I might add, regardless of how you feel, the wording of your !vote is dangerously close to a personal attack. Surely you can find better ways to express your concerns. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 22:23, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
  • I take your points about off-wiki sites, but I'm also referring to conduct on Wikipedia: specifically Carrite's repeated and totally unfounded accusations here, on this wiki, that someone was funding my travel. He was the first to make that claim, which he invented out of thin air. He had no reason to make it and no reason to believe that there was an atom of truth in it. It was malicious trolling, pure and simple, and it was a blatant lie which he seems to have promoted in order to discredit me in a discussion. I was disgusted by it then and I'm still disgusted by it now. Prioryman (talk) 22:35, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
  • I get it, you are upset, but please tone back and stop calling people liars. Honestly, I would strike and reword those because they aren't doing you any favors. And I say that as a fellow editor, not as an admin. My nomination isn't political, to make a statement or with any ulterior motives. He is just someone I've seen around a lot and from the work I've seen, he seems quite reasonable. That doesn't make me an expert, but I can only go by my own experiences. Any editor that I've seen around and has his depth of experience, then asks for a nomination, I'm likely to nominate them. Truth be told, I'm not a fan of the guy he is wanting to defend, but it isn't my place to judge. As for the other event you speak of, it would take a lot of research to look at it properly, and I honestly don't have the time. I'm supposed to be wikibreaking, due to working doubleshifts, and currently in the middle of writing an entirely new backup scheme from scratch, so rather preoccupied. This RfA is already taking up 10x more time than I thought it would. I expected a little resistance due to the unusual nature, but I didn't expect a firestorm. Again, from what I have personally seen, I trust Carrite and if someone else had nominated him, I would have already voted to support him being an admin. I'm sorry, but I'm just not familiar with your claims so I can't voice an opinion on them, and will leave it to the good judgement of the community to decide. That is what RfA is for. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 22:44, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
  • I'm not blaming you at all, Dennis, so please don't think I am, and I'm sorry that you're so hard-pressed at the moment. I know how it feels! As for what I said in the RfA, I'm simply calling it as it is. His claim about me being paid to go to Gibraltar was made up out of whole cloth. He lied. There's no way around that. Sure, I could probably wrap it up in euphemisms and handwaving, but the bottom line is that he lied. Anyway, I know you're busy, so I won't bother you further. Prioryman (talk) 23:24, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
For the record, I approached Dennis because I respect him and asked him to make the nomination; he did not approach me. For goodness sakes, give the man a break!!! Carrite (talk) 18:37, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, Dennis

The Original Barnstar
For the kindness shown me during my Request for Administration... Thank you, Prime Minister! Carrite (talk) 18:29, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
@Carrite, a unique RfA. Great withdrawal speech. Regards.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:36, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
  • You flatter me too much, but I appreciate the kindness. I also appreciate the trust you put in me by asking to nominate you. If you ever decide to make a full-time go at RfA, I will be happy to consider nominating you at that time. It was an interesting run and most people agreed that you should have the bit, even if a consensus didn't. It looks like some good things came from it, even if it didn't get the result either of us was hoping for. At the very least, it forced us to consider some new ideas as a community, and consider some new issues. To me, that is always a good thing. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 18:48, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Did I jump the gun here?

Hey Dennis or stalkers. I started an SPI here without a clue who the master was. Userpage and only other edit imply that this is a vandalism only account, but I reported it to SPI because the userpage also implied that the editor was a sock of someone. Ryan Vesey 00:43, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

User:Angela Criss is the master, I would imagine. --Floquenbeam (talk) 00:47, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks Floq, I updated the SPI accordingly. Ryan Vesey 00:50, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
NP. --Floquenbeam (talk) 01:02, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello stalkers

Thought I would say hi to friends and comrades, I know I haven't been around a lot. I've been researching hydroponic and indoor gardening lights for work (we may start selling them), plus migrating our entire offsite server system, plus is it is the busy time of year, although I wish it was busier (damn economy...) Honestly, I think the break is doing me good, giving me a chance to miss the place a bit. Hopefully, it will be a busy year, because lord knows, it hasn't been the last few years, hence the research into new products to sell. Anyway, I will try to check in as much as I can, but there will be 2 or 3 day stretches where I simply can't, sprinkled with days when I don't have much going on. I have been lurking around a little but not saying much, getting a new perspective on a few things here. Hope everyone is well. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 00:10, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

I get by; thank you. :-) Joke apart we miss you. --E4024 (talk) 00:21, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Indeed we do. AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 00:57, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Count me as a stalker - one that is increasingly curious what it is you do for a living. CorporateM (Talk) 01:43, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Maybe I've been blatantly misreading his talk page, but I think his company is expanding into this little gem. Ryan Vesey 01:48, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Stalker checking in; I'm fine, thanks - and just as unreliable time-wise as you these days. No gro-lites in my current situation, though. (Wondering if Ryan is correct in his guess....) KillerChihuahua 01:49, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Sort of. With medicinal marijuana coming in, there will be some demand for the growing lights, but the largest part of that market is actually non-cannabis use. I have a few of the 400w metal halides up for testing, but I won't be growing weed any time soon, just flowers and food. They don't have medicinal cannabis legalized in NC, although I would probably qualify due to long term back and tendon issues. Got my strawberries, ginger and basil already started. Will get the cucumbers, peppers, squash and others going in a month, including trying to grow some cukes indoors year round. Oh, and for the last 20 years, I've sold UV lighting and supplies (ballasts, fans and the like), for tanning, curing finishes, etc. so I'm very familiar with the technical aspects already. So it is part personal veggie gardening, part desire to find a new product line to make a living. Plus, I really enjoy gardening, indoors and out, so it is a natural fit for me. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 03:41, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Yo, Dudes. Does anyone have change for a $100. I don't want the guys on the corner to know I have so much money all at one time. Don't those lights hurt your eyes? I prefer a couple of lava lamps or a bunch of scented candles. I use to garden. I once had a whole forest of little Bonzai trees. But...then I chopped them all down to make doll furniture. ```Buster Seven Talk 07:59, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

I also live in NC and garden (but outdoors). What I love is how the article on cannabis cultivation has complaints of "original research" and "how-to advice" - sounds like Brown has been editing that one ;-) CorporateM (Talk) 00:00, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

      • Funny thing is, if the feds get involved, growing a single plant is a 5 year minimum jail sentence, so I won't be growing any cannabis any time soon. That isn't what interests me so much anyway, selling the supporting equipment does. I do see the laws changing radically over the next 10 years, so people are going to want growing equipment, and someone has to sell it to them. Besides, anything that is "taboo but legal" automatically has a better profit margin, it is the nature of commerce. I started doing some math, and figured that after all expenses, it is fairly easy to make $250,000 a year with a small basement by growing marijuana illegally. It is no wonder that many small growers want it to stay illegal. Just like with alcohol prohibition, there is a lot of profit (and violence) when you make something illegal. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 13:13, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
        • In Oregon, which has medical pot and small amounts of general possession is civil, not criminal, every town bigger than 3000 people has a place selling hydro equipment. Gtwfan52 (talk) 08:33, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Hehehe, no, just making a living. Like I've told others, really I only work 4 months out of the year, and this is just one of those months. The break does me good anyway, gives me a chance to miss the place. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 22:38, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
(talk page stalker)It will be interesting to see how things play out with the feds in Colorado and Washington. Any time a state makes a sweeping marijuana reform law (these states making the most sweeping ones possible) the feds duly remind us all that simply possessing any amount of marijuana is still illegal under federal law. Women and minority men voting in elections was for a great while also illegal under federal law, I might add. Time for progress? Yup. Both my states (Connecticut and Maine) have recently decriminalized possession of under 1/2 oz.; in nearby Massachusetts, you can possess up to 1 oz. for personal use, but possession of any drug paraphernalia is a misdemeanor crime.[3] That's the rolling papers you may have with your weed. In the other states I mentioned, possessing a pipe and a small amount of weed are separate civil violations (with varying fines for each, but at least you aren't charged with a criminal offense). In your state simply possessing under a 1/2 oz. is a misdemeanor crime, as it sadly still is in most.[4] Cultivation is a whole separate issue, not advisable to get involved with - check the website I liked for detailed (and ever-changing) laws state-by-state. Hopefully the states get it together soon enough that the feds see the benefits to decriminalizing and taxing the stuff like booze.
Anyway, off of the pulpit. Sell them pressurized sodium halides, whether for food or weed! Sell like the wind! t's great stuff that will sell. If you ship 'em out to Colorado: who cares what they are used for on the other end? If it's for weed or for growing prize roses, that's the customers' prerogative. I hope you sell a ton of them, Dennis! I really do ;> Doc talk 01:50, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Actually, I've sold some UV lighting to some "legal" cannabis growers in Colorado, who do it commercially, who ended up on a documentary I watched. (adding UV light during the final flowering stages is supposed to make the buds come in stronger.) As for legalization, I think we are at a tipping point, either it is going to get more legal, or it will be a backlash. Obama has turned himself into a liar on the subject, as the states have been getting the Feds to come in and do their dirty work in many areas, California in particular. Ironically, the recession is what will end up being the driving force into more legalization, not the idea that it is good policy. Taxes. As always, follow the money trail. I'm driven towards legalization simply because I'm an independent person with many views that are in common with Libertarians. I've never seen anyone get high then beat their wife, but I've seen many get drunk and do the same. No one has ever died of THC poisoning either. I consider alcohol a much more dangerous drug than cannabis. As for the lights, I'm testing out a few rigs right now, growing vegetables which are starting to come in now. I actually have an interest in them for growing fresh veggies year round at my house. I don't eat food that comes in a box, ever, and it is getting hard to buy fresh veggies in the winter on the east coast. I should upload some pictures once the cucumbers some in, but that won't be until May. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 13:09, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
I identify myself as libertarian too. Certainly if people have the freedom to make poor choices like dropping out of school, having kids and getting married, they can make choices some people think are poor, like smoking pot. :-p CorporateM (Talk) 23:36, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
In my younger and more hip days, I smoked a fair amount of pot on a regular basis. Of course, much of it was with lawyers, business owners and otherwise successful people, defying the stereotype of who uses cannabis, ie: the poor slob who can't hold a job. It is probably those experiences that shape my attitudes today. Most people that drink aren't slobbering drunks either. But again, that is only a tiny part of my interest, and not for myself. Like all good greedy capitalists, I just want to make a living. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 00:26, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Need an Admin

Hey Dennis, hope all is well. This afternoon, 107.4.229.24 repeatedly removing information from the WTRM and WTCF pages. User:Salamurai warned them once (probably more were needed) and continued to clean up the mess. Though both went well over 3RR, Salamurai was cleaning up vandalism so it shouldn't be held against him, but the anon was warned and I was wondering if it is too late to issue a edit warring block.

I am aware that you are now officially on WikiBreak, so if you wish to pass this onto someone else, I understand. Take Care and Enjoy your time off...Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:29, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

I looked at the one edit, [5] and kind of see why the IP removed it. It isn't really secondarily sourced like you would like, ie: a news source or at least a press release. It is sourced via the FCC and there is no context with the document. You have to poke around to get the full story, so it is less than optimal, at the least. You told them that they "shouldn't be editing those pages anyway", which isn't completely accurate. If they do work for the company, then they have a COI, but that isn't a bar to editing. Prudence is warranted and editing the page isn't recommended, but it is within policy for them to edit the article directly. You left a notice on their page, I would recommend trying to start a dialog instead of just blocking them, about 3RR, and I wouldn't instantly discount their input just because they have a COI. Not all COI editing is lies, after all. If I were to treat them like anyone else, I would suggest dialog first and give them every chance to comply with 3RR and neutrality. After educating them properly, if they won't act within policy, then it can be reviewed at ANI, but I recommend you try everything else first. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 00:53, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Well, hopefully, they will respond to my post and I can start a dialog then. I always read COI as if you work for a particular company (in this case, a radio station) that you shouldn't edit the page. Of course, we have had problems in the past that required blocks, so I think that's where I got that skewed view of WP:COI.
As for the lack of non-FCC sources, I think that is cause the information was initially posted late on Friday, so none of the big name websites had a chance to post anything before 5 O'Clock. I suspect we will see something online on Monday. There are a couple local websites that have posted something about it, but they take their information directly from the FCC posting and original research, so I am not sure how they would hold up to WP:RS.
Guess we will wait and see how the anon responds and what is posted on Monday.
Hope you have a good WikiBreak and time offline. :) "See" ya when you get back...whenever. :) Take Care...Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:03, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
In case you look in on the ol' Wiki tomorrow, just wanted to update you on this. About 4am on Friday, this was posted on AllAccess, a big national radio business website. AllAccess is considered a reliable source, so it has been used alot across the Wiki. So, it was out on a public website before I posted it on Wikipedia making the anon's claim moot. I will, however, still try and create a dialog with the anon and go from there. Just wanted to keep you in the loop. Take Care...Neutralhomer • Talk • 07:30, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Sounds like a better source. I would still link the FCC stuff, but context is important too. At the end of the day, it looks like the IP was acting in good faith, sincere actions. That makes all the difference in how I react to someone, and how hard I try to communicate and work with someone. Its all about AGF. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 13:11, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Forgot about this thread, hence my slow response. :) Anywho, I just added the AllAccess story to the FCC information. More references than I like for just one sentence, but it's cool. Haven't seen any problems on their page since the user was warned by User:Salamurai and to be honest, I don't expect any. The news of the sale is out there from many different sources, not just Wikipedia, so I doubt the anon will come back around. Thanks for your help, mostly in keeping my cool. :) Take Care...Neutralhomer • Talk • 08:41, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Your comment on ANI

"Work with them" [6] I already quoted the policy chapter and verse, they chose to ignore it. You can't work with people who ignore policy. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:25, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

RfA: thank you for your support

Dennis, I wanted to briefly thank you for your support during my RfA. Assuming I survive the last 24 hours of voting, I hope that I can of future service to you with admin tasks. If not, well, I stand ready to collaborate as an editor on a project of your choice. Regards, Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 00:11, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

  • RfA is a funny beast. Looking at your, I don't see any "cabal" at work, I know most of the people there and think the overwhelming majority were very sincere in their comments. On the up side, most agreed you would be fine with the bit, but it does take more than "most" to get the bit. I think if you take the constructive criticism to heart, you would have a good go at it next time. People have a very high expectation for admin to be extraordinarily calm and collected, although this wasn't always the case. People's expectations have changed and the bar has gotten higher over time, even from just a year ago when I sought the bit. Regardless of the outcome, I know people appreciate your contributions. I'm used to the debating style of many lawyers, having worked for one as a criminal defense investigator for some time, but not everyone appreciates the skills. For me personally, I've found working at Wikipedia to be very beneficial, as I've learned how to be less combative and more cooperative, something that has bled into my real life skill set with positive results. I still think you would make a good admin, but at the same time, I respect the concerns of the opposing parties about how you might come across. When I first got the bit, I managed to rub a few people wrong until I learned to pull back, as others will treat you differently once you are an admin. As long as you take it as a learning experience, good things will come from the process. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 13:29, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the kind remarks and the sound advice, Dennis. As I review my RfA, I'm not sure if I would want to do it again, but it's always better to let the dust settle before making decisions and commitments regarding the future. It's not something I crave or need, but I did believe that I had something additional to offer the project. Either way, it doesn't rise to the level of Greek tragedy. Perspective must be maintained. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 13:58, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Spoiler alerts

I love Downton Abbey. If you or any stalkers also enjoy the show, do NOT go to the article. You will read about the death of a major character that has not been shown on American TV. It brings up the issue of "Spoiler Alerts". I am on the verge of an editwar about this important issue and I'm not sure how to proceed. I know I kid/joke around alot but this is a serious issue for the Encyclopedia. DaltAbby is one of the most popular International shows with millions of US viewers. They will be MAD at WIKIPEDIA if they read that article. I know I was!!!! What does Big Brother do about their overnight-24 hour feed giving out info 3 days before broadcast.??? ``Buster Seven Talk 19:19, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Spoiler alert was just to catch your (and stalker) attention. My point at the article with the other editor is that ....we NOT inlude the two or three words that identify the death of a major character. Its in an info-box w/ actor...role...character. And in the character column the words "late" and "deceased" are used. My point is WHY?. Its mean-spirited. Especially when another editor (Me) points it out. And, in a week, when the show airs next Sunday, it won't matter one iota. Right now it matters millions of iotas!!!! ```Buster Seven Talk 19:36, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not censored. We aim to include all relevant information in articles. Obviously that raises issues with spoilers, but ultimately readers come here looking for information and that's the need we should be catering for. Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 20:33, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, Buster. I disagree with you completely, pal. I think the best solution to this problem is to go back to being an encyclopedia and quit covering things of minor importance, like TV shows, until they fall into the category of history as opposed to current events. But that's not going to happen...so, just stay away from the articles about shows you like, perhaps? Gtwfan52 (talk) 05:06, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
WP:SPOILER says, "It is not acceptable to delete information from an article because you think it spoils the plot." But it also says, "When including spoilers, editors should make sure that an encyclopedic purpose is being served. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information—articles on a work of fiction should primarily describe it from a real-world perspective, discussing its reception, impact and significance." DoctorJoeE talk to me! 05:54, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
I will leave it to you guys to debate, you seem to know more about it than I do. In an internet age, people download or watch episodes online, so spoilers are a whole different thing. As to whether or not it belongs in an info box, I tend to think DoctorJoeE makes a good point, that we are likely better served being blind to the idea of spoilers and look at it from a purely encyclopedic perspective. What that means, I will leave to the editors. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 13:33, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Unblock on hold at User talk:History1221

Hi Dennis. I see you are trying to take a break, but it looks like you are checking in here fairly regularly. This seems like a sticky one, this guy's story could be genuine, he could just be confused or something. No SPI is mentioned in the block log so I am assuming you saw something that made you certain enough to block. So, looking for a little insight on the evidence supporting the block and your take on the latest unblock request. Feel free to email me if there are details you would rather not mention on-wiki. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:26, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Dennis, now get back to taking a break. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:14, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Hehe, real break. Working double shifts. Just got home and I have a couple works to do before sleeping a bit and starting all over again. Seasonal jobs are a pain, and the older I get, the more it beats me down, but I'm too old to learn a new trick. Hope my note there helps add some clarity. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 23:56, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 February 2013

Image request

Hi Dennis. I really don't want to, but because nobody else is, I'm going through the Request Edit queue (except for my own obviously). I came across this person who I think needs admin help. CorporateM (Talk) 20:00, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

  • Good timing, I was looking up some chemical info here and saw your note. I left a message there at that image. I don't see any deleted material, but directed him to INeverCry, who is an admin on both Wikis and should be able to find anything I missed. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 20:16, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Was SPI really the best place for this?

I brought this to SPI, but now I'm wondering if it was really the best place for it. Is it more of a WP:AN type discussion, or even an unneeded discussion? Ryan Vesey 00:18, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

  • Normally, I would have dropped it on the main page at SPI just asking for a CU to look at it. You didn't really provide any diffs, which is something you might do (I know, only 4, but some CUs are picky about that) along with a little context. ANI is another option, but it is a bit presumptive at this point without more info. Of course, they eat up presumptive at ANI. If they are another user and avoiding scrutiny, it is still borderline unless you explain what "abuse" there is. Using a different name to hide your identity can be covered under some legitimate uses. I haven't dug up deep enough to know in this case as I'm a bit short on time, but wanted to at least give you a little info. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 00:26, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

I don't know what to do or who to call

Hi, Dennis. I was just cruising around Wikiland today and came across this which led me to this. Seems like an obvious violation of the one user to an account rule, not to mention some academic using editing for his purposes rather than the betterment of the encyclopedia. This seems like it might be out of your department too, but perhaps you can refer it to the right person? Gtwfan52 (talk) 02:35, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, Mr. Brown. Done. Gtwfan52 (talk) 02:57, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

I, on the other hand, know exactly who to call...

Hi Dennis. I know you're currently rather busy in some imaginary world you've dreamed up called "real life" (honestly, that's such an implausible concept), but I'm hoping you can tear yourself away from your burgeoning business as a drug dealer hydroponic marketing guru to take a look at an issue I'm currently examining. I need the opinion of someone with vast depths of wiki-knowledge, a good understanding of IPs and checkuser processes, and a famously even-handed and impartial manner. But you'll do .

The crux of the matter is encapsulated at this ANI thread. Basically, User:Elvenscout742 is being repeatedly reverted and opposed across a number of Japan-related articles by a series of IPs which are probably operated by User:JoshuSasori. Checkuser can't/won't tie the IPs to a named user, and many of the edits are arguably valid (I'm currently in the awkward position of (rightly or wrongly) supporting the IPs' stance on Jigai, for example), so it's difficult to prove that this is genuinely a single user following Elvenscout around and mindlessly reverting him. The range is apparently too large to block (see Rschen7754's comments at the bottom of the JoshuSasori SPI), and since the disruption is aimed at Elvenscout rather than at any particular article, page protection isn't likely to be much help (we can't simply silverlock every page Elvenscout edits).

So Dennis, I come to you, and ask for your opinion: what is the best way to protect Elvenscout from harrassment? Hopefully you can tear yourself away from your hydroponics long enough to offer some useful advice. All the best, Yunshui 雲‍水 13:59, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Real Life?


"What is this "real life" that you speak of, and where can I Download it?"'

Cleo Rocos

Hi, Dennis (and stalkers). The IP you blocked for evading a block for violating 3RR on this page has returned. I'm putting this here because I don't really want to cause any more drama on ANI or elsewhere, and I've tried to firefight a bit on the talk page, but this might be one to watch as technically it's circumventing a block. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:29, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Hmm... given the fact that the IP hopper is at it again, I can say that this looks like a major problem here. Same internet service, same location (the IPs geolocate to Santiago, Chile), same attitude. To me, it's basically an obvious duck. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:09, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Problem being that I'm so rare around here this time of year, it is very hard for me to follow the chase. Might need to ask a CU like DoRD or DeltaQuad about doing a rangeblock. Other than that, some page protection if the number of articles is small. I haven't been able to check in at Wikipedia in a few days, working overtime and had family over for the weekend. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 13:15, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Renom of Aaron Schwartz for deletion

As you expressed an opinion in the first AfD, thought you might want to be aware of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Schwartz (2nd nomination). Article is much better sourced than it was then. Yworo (talk) 01:48, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Pratyeka

Hi Dennis. Regarding Pratyeka, this is just a reminder that a few weeks have elapsed now, so it may be time to open the discussion, if you're still up for it and are able. If you and Cas are not, no worries. I'll take it to AN.

(I've posted this to Cas's talk page too.) --Anthonyhcole (talk) 15:37, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 February 2013

Help revising the page

Hello there... can I ask for help revising the page.. [[7]] Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by KayHana (talk • contribs) 01:08, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi!

If you get a chance, would you mind dropping by and saying something at User talk:Deacon of Pndapetzim‎? The related ANI thread is Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Confusing_page_moves_and_deletions. Perhaps something more gentle than "You've abused the delete button and should resign" which is all that I can come up with at 3 AM :/ Maybe helping him to see why his actions and response haven't been exactly optimal. --Rschen7754 10:44, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

  • Just woke up, not fully caffeinated yet but look at this briefly, it looks like a middle finger on the way out the door. I tend to think you and Floq combined are right on the money. It seems several people have overreacted a bit, blowing it out of proportion. Only Arb can take action and it is best to wait a day or two to see how it pans out. Everything can be undeleted at that time. As long as he isn't doing anything that affects other people, there is no emergency here. I left a msg on his talk page, an invite to just talk privately, see what the real issue is. I assume that over the next couple of weeks all the pages will be undeleted without my assistance, so I'm more interested in what started this process. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 12:47, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
    • Yeah, what concerned me overall is more of an admin who has indicated that he will not abide by community consensus, and has no motivation to do so... I tried a deletion review to try and prevent a wheel war, but that didn't go so well. Hopefully it all works out. Thanks! --Rschen7754 21:33, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
      • If this was negatively affecting anyone directly, I would be more aggressive, but it is just his own pages, and we both know that they will eventually go to review and get restored, via common outcome, so I just didn't want to stir the pot up. There is no "victim" here, so a little delay won't hurt anyone. What matters more is that we are losing yet another long time editor/admin. I would rather try to figure out why, and if it can be prevented, then the other issue would take care of itself. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 21:42, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
        • Yeah, we had a similar deletion issue a few weeks ago on Wikidata when an admin failed reconfirmation... and basically we decided to just revert the damage once the flag was gone. A bit puzzling though how his opinion of the site changed so dramatically, though. --Rschen7754 01:06, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
          • At WP:WER we find that it isn't usually a short term issue that causes the long time editor to leave (admin or not), but a long term frustration, typically over the bureaucracy. It is easy for all of us, myself included, to sometimes get so caught up in the letter of the policies that we lose sight of the bigger picture, building the encyclopedia. This is why I try to change up what I do, where I contribute, and even how much I contribute. My job actually helps, forcing me to cut back for a few months each year. You've been here a long time, just like he and I, you know how easy it is to get in a rut or get cynical, we see it in others sometimes. I'm fortunate enough to have good friends here who will just email me and say "Dennis, you are in a rut, you need to take a break". I'm not sure his exact reasons, but trying to find out. I doubt I can change his mind, but I at least want to understand, for the future. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 01:16, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Cleanup

Hello, Dennis Brown.

You are invited to join WikiProject Cleanup, a WikiProject and resource for Wikipedia cleanup listings, information and discussion.

To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:47, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Proposed edit-notice

Hi Dennis. I would be curious what your thoughts are on Template_talk:COI_editnotice and the corresponding RfC on the Talk page if you have a moment. CorporateM (Talk) 02:16, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

  • I'm going to try to look at this closer this weekend. I'm due to nom an RfA candidate and try to get a few minor things done, but it is on my short list of important things. I've looked briefly and not sure how I feel about how strong the wording is. In the real world, spending all my time crash coursing on UV curing, hydroponics, aeroponics, indoor gardening, while designing several new products AND it being the busiest time of the year. That and I apparently have flying ants in the house, oy. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 13:32, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
I changed it to "encouraged" to make it sound less militant. SlimVirgin and I have gone back and forth a bit and I know there is no consensus on the issue, but I think most would at least support a "hey swing it by us... get a second opinion" type of thing. BTW - I may also see about organizing Wikipedia:Meetup/Raleigh 3 (I think you are local), but I don't know if I will spend the time to organize it or not for sure yet. CorporateM (Talk) 01:37, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
FYI - there is a related conversation here on why COIs are often argumentative and unpleasant. Though I would say, that an editor that works in SPI will have a different perspective than one that works in OTRS, COIN or AfC. One other argument I'll present here. I support the edit-notice and/or Talk template on all organization articles, because if we implement it only on org articles that have problematic COI behavior, that would be most of them anyway. I enjoy participating in the discussions, because it always gives me more perspective. Cheers. CorporateM (Talk) 18:44, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2013

Wazzzzzzup Dennis Brown

Hey, I thought of you in the car today--it was not a bad day to almost be an American, driving down the road in a paid-off Camry on a not-too cold day, listening to Couldn't Stand the Weather. Rock and roll! Drmies (talk) 19:42, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

  • I used to know what "paid off" meant, before 2008. Right now, I'm so sick of the cold and rain, I'm ready to move down south. We do have a factory in Alabama, but I'm afraid the culture shock would be too great. Nice enough folks working at the factory, I suppose, but not the most culturally enlightened. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 13:19, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
    • I use to be able to brag about how my motorcycle was paid in cash ($5k, much cheaper than a car), but now that I live somewhere where it snows in the winter and white-lining is illegal, doesn't seem like much worth bragging about; considering how often I borrow my wife's car ;-) CorporateM (Talk) 13:38, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
      • A little New Orleans, southern comfort food. This'll heat you up quickly. A tad too much hot sauce but delicious!
--Amadscientist (talk) 06:00, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Another sock?

Hey man. You still on your Wikibreak? Anyway, I saw you block Wendy Decker (talk · contribs) a while back due to being a sock of Mason Decker (talk · contribs), and I think another one has sprung up: Ludwig von Decker (talk · contribs), who I'm pretty sure is a sock due to rather WP:DUCKish behavior. What do you think? ZappaOMati 02:30, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Never mind, looks like Sergecross73 (talk · contribs) covered it. ZappaOMati 03:31, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Re Paul Siebert's SPI

Thank you Dennis for closing the SPI. Unfortunately, I cannot say I am fully satisfied with your conclusion ("I don't see clear indications..."). The very idea that I can engage in sockpuppetry is insulting, so what I want is a unambiguous conclusion that I and Anixx1 (and UUNC) are different users. In other words, I insist on check user procedure to prove (unequivocally) that I am not a sockmaster. Could you please do that for me?
Regards,
--Paul Siebert (talk) 19:39, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

  • No I can't. We can't run a CU to prove someone isn't linked, per policy and simply the practicality of it. You can't prove a negative. What was found was no convincing evidence of abuse, which is as good as it gets. People often get it wrong, that is why we put experienced eyes on it. My statement was pretty strong that there were no indications that sockpuppeting took place. We never speak in absolutes at SPI. I understand the frustration of being accused, but I wouldn't let it bother you, it won't affect anything you do here. It is just one more unsubstantiated claim, no one will hold that against you. I've been accused of worse at ANI, for example. It sucks, but again, no evidence to support it was found. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 19:45, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Looking for Feedback

I've got an idea, which I want to post at Village pump (idea lab), but I want some informal feedback first.

In a nutshell, I'd like to create a list or table of the top editors of each article, and add it to the top of the Talk Page.

I've written a draft at: User:Sphilbrick/Top ten editors

At the moment, I'm only asking for feedback from you, Dennis, because you are at the top of the Editor retention sign-up, and you Ironholds, just because I think you are very interested in ideas for editor retention.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 20:07, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

  • I would have to think about it a bit. I assume by "top editor" you mean those that have made the most edits. Will this lead to WP:OWNership? Will it make someone who is new the article less bold, thinking that person has more authority? I don't know. It is an interesting idea and I agree it would be good to get the idea vetted by a large number of people. I would have to ponder on it a while before having a firm opinion. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 20:17, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
By Top editor, I mean by edit count. Two thoughts running through my head, one is that I'd prefer byte count, but I don't think that is easy, while edit count is trivial. Second, I do appreciate ownership issues. As a start, maybe a term other than "Top" would be better. However, I don't see that as a major concern. I find it difficult to image an editor contemplating an edit to an article, checking the list, seeing that someone else has more edits, and declining to edit. However, it does add to the notion of doing this as a pilot, so we can monitor for some time to see if there are unintended consequences. Frankly, I'm more concerned about gamesmanship. Someone is planning to add a paragraph, sees that they are number 11 on the list and decides to add it a sentence at a time, to move onto the list. One more argument for a pilot. There's no rush, give it some thought, I may run it by a couple others.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 14:09, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
I thought of that as well, anything can be gamed, as you know. The OWNership issue isn't about one article as much as I worry it creates a perception that the people who edit the most, matter the most. Again, something I need to ponder on. I like the idea of finding ways to take note of prolific contributors. I wonder about singling out editors who maintain very high edit ratios to articles as well, but that is problematic in some ways as well. But your idea is certainly interesting and worth looking at closer. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 14:25, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
(talk page stalker)I would add a timer (if possible), so it was only the editors most active on the article that month or year. Otherwise many articles would have names of retired editors from years ago. Then, give users the ability to add it to their user page so it automatically reflects the articles they are most active on recently. This would also make it easier if you enjoy working with someone to follow them around, edit more often to keep your status, or compete with other editors for the top spot in an article. Obviously the quality versus quantity issue is prominent (and unfixable), but it may do more good than harm overall still. I also wonder about the burden on the servers if it was timer-based and implemented on all articles.
The other issue, for example when O'Dwyer was emailing me about my edits to the Public Relations Society of America article, he kept assuming I made edits that I did not make and it was really frustrating that he assumed any change to the article was written by me. People may start assuming those editors are responsible for the page, etc. CorporateM (Talk) 22:32, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi

Hi Dennis, hope work is treating you well and you're not snowed under. Lord knows I am. Anyway, was just wondering what you think of this. Hardly ground-breaking but I think it summarises this problem in a way I haven't read anywhere else. Do you think it has a place in project namespace? Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 14:17, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I think much of this is covered by other documents, but it's interesting and useful to point it out specifically. One thought, it could really use a better title. CorporateM (Talk) 22:22, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
  • It is interesting. I thought of a few fine tuning points, and like Corp said, some of the points are covered in other areas, but I find the idea pretty useful. Give me a little time and I will leave some specific thoughts on the talk page of that essay itself. And yes, it has been hell lately. Today, solving two different engineering problems (I'm not an engineer), plus our main admin person's computer died, forcing me to seek warranty assistance from Dell (slightly less painful than having wisdom teeth pulled, but just slightly), plus my regular duties, in a crappy economy. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 22:25, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Courtesy note

Hi Dennis. I have responded to your comments at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Restrict rangeblocks to CheckUsers and thought it would be courteous to let you know. Best regards. 64.40.54.254 (talk) 20:25, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

  • Thanks for the heads up, I do get lost from time to time. I've replied there as well. I think your heart is in the right place, but your solution has its own problems. We both do agree that there is room for improvement with how we handle rangeblocks, and IP blocks in general. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 22:22, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, Dennis. I appreciate the input. I guess my experience with the project is different than yours. I'm an IP and I'm treated like an IP.Which I consider a benefit, because I know how Wikipedia treats the rest of the world. You are one of the most well-respected admins on the project, and for good reason. You're calm, thoughtful and have the best interests of the project at heart. I think in this instance we just happen to disagree on the best solution. BTW, if you want to see rangeblocks that are more than 1 year old, you can check Wikipedia:Database_reports/Range_blocks which lists all our rangeblocks and when they were put in place. Rangeblocks 1 through 642 are 1 year or older. I'll close by saying thanks for starting WP:WER. I think editor retention is the biggest threat to the project and I'm glad people are trying to do something about it. Kind regards. 64.40.54.79 (talk) 05:45, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
I probably need to find a way to parse that list out. I took a long wikibreak and edited as an IP for two years. I do understand the frustration. Perhaps it is just because my experiences with range blocks and CUs are different than yours, I work with them on the administrative end daily as an SPI clerk. But again, we both agree there is lots of room for improvement, so we aren't so far apart. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 11:49, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Cranial-rectal inversion issue

Bwahahahahahahahahahahaha! I love it! I must remember this phrase! Possible essay material!--Amadscientist (talk) 04:51, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) In medicine, we (or at least I) refer to this condition as recto-cephalic intussusception. Once upon a time I wrote it up for the Journal of Irreproducible Results. The malady is obvious -- and unfortunately quite common. Cheers, DoctorJoeE review transgressions/talk to me! 13:51, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

  • You crazy doctors and your $3 words. Sometimes it's as if you are speaking in Latin. We need someone to create a truly free version of this image file. [8] I looked, couldn't fine one, just a couple claiming they were but really aren't.Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 13:55, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
    • Oh, and Amadscientist, maybe you should start User:Amadscientist/CRI, although my suggesting this is a violation of WP:BEANS. I bet you could create an image that would duplicate the look and feel of the above linked one, but free. I would assume that essay would be filed under "humor" as WP:CRI eventually. Fortunately, CRI is most often an acute syndrome easily treated with clue applied liberally, although for a few, it is chronic or even terminal. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 14:00, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) "Crazy doctors" ... that's a bit of a redundancy ... Omnia mihi lingua Graeca sunt ... DoctorJoeE review transgressions/talk to me! 14:11, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 March 2013

Global/unified account

Could you give me your input on this and what you think. Is this a good idea? What are the benifits and drawbacks?--Amadscientist (talk) 01:07, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

  • I have one because I visit other sites, and even if I don't edit much there, I like being able to set preferences. Your name should already be protected on them, I believe, so unless someone has your name from before unification (2008 I think) then your name is already protected. I personally edit at Commons a little, at simple.wikipedia.org some, plus just use a few others. On my user/talk page on those sites, I just put a note pointing them to my enwp talk page, telling them I don't check in often enough to keep up and to ping me here if they have a question. I even use the non-English versions of Wikipedia to compare articles sometimes, letting Google Chrome translate, just to compare general facts, etc. It isn't a big deal if you don't ever go to the other sites, but it isn't a big deal to setup the global account either. I think you click two buttons or something similar. I don't know of any downsides, really. I lean towards recommending it just because the other sites are handy, like Wikibooks, Wikiquotes, Wikisource, Commons, Meta, etc. If you decide to leave a comment in a discussion, you are already logged in, for instance. http://simple.wikipedia.org is also needing help writing articles, something I should spend more time doing. It is pretty low key, low drama as well. It is also harder than it sounds, making articles in very simple English. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 01:37, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
I have noticed that for some reason I cannot stay logged in at commons and the other Wiki sites that I have accounts (and use the same username) so I was hoping this would help that issue. Will this help keep me logged in at commons or is that strictly a browser issue? And thanks for taking a moment to address this for me!--Amadscientist (talk) 01:52, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) You don't have a SUL account set up according to [9]. If you go to Special:MergeAccount you should be able to get one though. --Rschen7754 03:19, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Exactly. It isn't a big deal for people who never use commons, but the login/out is much easier with the SUL/global account. I will say that if you leave the box "stay logged in" checked, it is fully seemless, but less so if you leave it unchecked, like I do at work. There, I still have to log in individually to the diff sites. I assume it has to do with the type of cookies it uses, persistent vs temporary. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 11:42, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

FIVE channels? ...

Dag-gum-it son. We didn't get our 4th and 5th channels (UHF) until I was like 13-14 years old .. and only with a WHOLE lot of tin-foil. — Ched :  ?  12:49, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

  • I was one of 7 kids in a military family, so they sprung for cable TV as a pacifier, so we got WFAA and KERA, plus some other independent Dallas station I forget the call letters for. The town I grew up in only had one NBC station KRBC and KTXS which then broadcast both ABC/CBS, rotating them. And it wasn't a small town, actually. We didn't get a real ABC and CBS station until I hit high school. That is back when we kids used to entertain ourselves doing what mom called "go outside and play". ;-) Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 14:15, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
You guys want to try living in the UK, where five terrestrial channels was the norm until perhaps five years ago. We never did that "going outside" thing you mention, though; it was usually raining... Yunshui 雲‍水 14:21, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
At least you got the B. We couldn't get Monty Python, Benny Hill or Faulty Towers except by getting cable and watching it on KERA. We did get The Six Million Dollar Man and Battle of the Network Stars over the air, however. And we didn't have to pay a special tax per television, we just had to put up with commercials. Now that I think about it, you might have gotten the better deal. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 14:26, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
We still had three commercial channels - though ITV and Channel 5 were tripe. No TV fee for me, though; I got rid of mine years ago. Never missed it, except for David Attenborough... Yunshui 雲‍水 14:31, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
I watch his documentaries on Netflix, and on cable before that. Excellent presenter. BBC still creates the best documentaries. I used to watch the History Channel, until it became the reality TV channel.... Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 14:34, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
My kids love Sir David's DVDs (although my youngest seems to be labouring under the conviction that all birds - and all other animals save pigs, actually - are ducks). He's a lovely man; I had a nice chat with him a few years back when he did a signing at my shop. I've actually seen some decent stuff on the History Channel at my in-laws; usually around 3am with a small, grizzly child on my lap.
Hang on, shouldn't you be using your valuable seconds here to do something encyclopedic, rather than jawing over TV shows with us? This ain't Facebook, you know! Yunshui 雲‍水 14:40, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
I'm waiting for a Dell technician to come and replace a motherboard for a system under warranty, and answer customer calls. Hard to focus on content when doing that. I will go block some random editor later on, so I can say I did something constructive today ;) Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 15:37, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
I'm flattered you'd spend your limited on-wiki time chewing that fat with yours truly. Best of luck with that constructive random blocking. Try not to pick me or Jimbo. Yunshui 雲‍水 21:01, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
I volunteer for that if you don't feel like being randaom! Gtwfan52 (talk) 21:09, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
You young Whipper-snappers! Why, when I was a kid, we had to walk five miles to the nearest 12" round screen black and white TV set in Mr Jingles Hardware and Dry Goods Store front window. And most of the time all we saw was "the Indian". ```Buster Seven Talk 21:47, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
I was lucky. We weren't that far from a large city; so by the mid-late 70s, I was able to get my own place - and I actually had cable before my parents IIRC. (not that I got see or hear much as I was also newly married). I'm not familiar with Bloom, looks like my loss. @ Dennis - would that be this Cabal? — Ched :  ?  23:42, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Well, starting next week, I will be scarce again. This week I was waiting for engineering samples, which shipped to me Friday. I have to do well over a dozen different spectral tests using 4 different electronics system over the next two weeks, while I do my regular job. I had to build my own rig for testing ultraviolet resin curing lamp (fluorescent) samples. Using OSB and misc. hardware bolted together Frankenstein-like, with quick connections for the different ballasts. It is so ugly, it is a thing of beauty. As long as they will light and cure UV resin, I'm golden. The rig reminds me of an old Johnny Cash song. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 00:09, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

I am reporting user User talk:Isaacl for copyright violation. I created a template for the EOTW sub project to Editor Retention. This took me several hours to create. I just noticed that Isaacl has created another base template using my exact design and work [10] without attributing it and has credited himself for the initial creation on the first post [11].

For this reason I am removing the EDOTW from the Editor Retention mainpage until this situation is rectified as a blatant copyright violation. The project will not promote this type of behavior. I have left a not at the user page but i am asking that you warn the editor that he is not welcome to be disruptive. He doesn't seem interested in joining the project so I am also asking that he refrain from further wok in that area. He has been disruptive and a bit combative and has been moving templates and editing them to suit his ideas. For this reason I am changing ER guidelines to no longer allow non project member to interfer with editing Project pages in any manner.--Amadscientist (talk) 08:14, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

  • Looks like you guys are already talking about it, and he has tried to rectify the situation. I will leave it you two to work out then. If not, it would be matter of ANI, but I don't know how serious they would view it. Interwiki copyright infringement isn't handled very evenly, which is why I hope you two can just work it out. Nice looking template, btw, so I can see why he would want to use it, but yes, he should give credit where it is due. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 13:29, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
This isn't ANI material. Nor something I feel needs to go to the Copyright noticeboard. As long as attribution is fixed I don't even care how ridiculed I am at the projects but there has been far too much disruption by non members trying to change major pages to refect a collboration they can't be bothered to join. Anyone can help out on project goals and assist editors without joining the projects, but all project pages and templates, assesment etc. are in the control of project editors. His contributions were gnome work and they were worthwhile. I have no issue with that, He has been doing this for months but it looks strange to be editing Editor of Week pages, where we recognize editors that use best practices yet he doesn't even feel inclined to join any of the projects themselves. The attribution issue was simple enough that I thought it could be handles and he would simply add his name, but if this is challenged the Project guidelines do state that members control project pages and consensus is formed by them. This has been a bit disruptive in the past but i have treid to allow the editor some room to be creative and work with us but I do not believe it is appropriate for an editor, not a member of either projects, to be making such bold edits that clearly demonstrate a lack of concern on the basic principles of the projects and Wikipedia. It shouldn't be that difficult for him to add his name and join our project.--Amadscientist (talk) 18:58, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
That does make sense, if you are going to make changes to a Project's pages (outside of a talk page), then you should join up, but like you said, there is not much enforcement via policy on these issues. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 19:02, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
This has happened before on WP:OWS where an editor immediatly took the logo I designed and copied it into another image exactly as I had made it and refused to attribute me. When I reversed his contributions he edit warred and an admin did step in and inform the editor that project pages are in the control of project members and consensus is formed by them. I invited the editor to join but he didn't want to and was simply told not to disrupt the project further if he wasn't willing to add his name and help form a consensus with invOlved editors.
Also,Isaacl didn't follow the guidelines of attribution. The attribution is supposed to be made with a link in the edit summary to both pages similar to: "Content from Article has been merged into article. There are also several other pages created using this materail.--Amadscientist (talk) 19:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
The editor in question has been an active and highly visible member of the EotW project from the very beginning 3 months ago. I have asked him 5 times to include his name in the members list. Not sure why he doesn't but I still consider him a MeMber. I understand Amad's concewrn and in no way besmirch his credibility. I too wondered why Isaac didnt join and was a bit perplexed why he didnt even acknowledge my urgings to add his name. ```Buster Seven Talk 20:45, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Credit is due where credit is due, I believe that, but I've staying a bit to the side simply because I don't have all the info, and I've discovered that often people can just work things out on their own. One disadvantage of having the admin bit is that our words are sometimes given too much weight, and when I don't have all the facts, that can cause bigger problems. He doesn't have to add his name, it is voluntary, but he does need to properly give credit where it is due when he reuses copyrighted material. That isn't even about Wikipedia, that is about common courtesy when using material that belongs to someone else and who has said "do anything you want with it, just give me credit for my part". I've seen our local phone book company steal a few of my images and use them without giving me credit as well, distributing 100k copies of it to the public, without credit. Yes, it pissed me off, but in the end, I let it slide because it wasn't worth the drama, even though I could easily prove I owned the photos. It wasn't about money, it was about giving credit where it was due for my art, which I had so generously licensed as Free but with attribution. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 22:33, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

My main issue was the attribution and it has been taken care of. As Dennis has experianced, I have as well had something similar happen, but in a way that was just more than I could allow. My photos from Commons and the Wikipedia pages were used by a national chain restaurant and was made in to ginat wallpaper images in the one right in my neighborhood. It was huge, obvious and could be seen as soon as you walked in the door..where they gave credit to all the photographers except the images they used from Commons. Everytime I go there I have to see my work in a huge display of failure to attribute the work that I give freely as long as you credit it to me as I have requested. So I asked them to and they did. I just wanted a little label maker lable or even let me write it with a sharpy myself. LOL! They ordered something nice and treated it with the same respect as the othe attributions they were giving. SO, I do try to remind myself that this will happen, but I do need to ask, especially on Wikipedia.

As for the Project requirements, he doesn't have to sign anything to creat a template. Not like anyone would obect to that, especialy if properly attributed. But it is not the obligation of the project to use it. That is a matter of consensus that he would not be able to take part in to decide. However I don't think its a leap off faith to believe that everyone (including me) thinks the work is an improvement. We just need to remember that if mistakes are made in the implementation or application of something that effects the template or the way it is displayed or even has issues in other ways, there are going to be at least two or three editors who are signed up and have some form of consensus to make these determinations. I ain't special. I have no special powers. I do want anyone interested to join in with helping create it, move it forward and contribute to it.--Amadscientist (talk) 23:32, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

help requested

Drmies sent me your way. Talk:Shooting_of_Trayvon_Martin has a new SPA ranting excessively. He actually has some decent suggestions, but insists on making accusations of a cabal and bias. Hes single handedly doubled the length of the article talk page currently, with highly repetative rants and accusations. Could someone send a warning and some guidance his way? the suggestions from the article editors seem to not be going anywhere in that regard. Gaijin42 (talk) 23:13, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

WP:DENY
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Dennis Brown - Hey glad your little minion Gaijin42 pinged you over my double spacing. I really did not know that double spacing on the talk page was so frowned upon. Thanks for enlightening me. Boy, I won't do that again -- God forbid, right.
By the way, Dennis, I was not, and am "stressed out" as you put it. The article is riddled with false and misleading information and it is clear that your minions, who operate that wiki blog page, reject truth and do not let facts get the way of their "agenda." Therefore, it is abundantly evident, from their wiki blog page and their talk page, that a bias cabal is, indeed, manning that wiki blog page. And for that reason, I wrote a firm note with facts that made your minions run to you, their project editor and accuse me of "ranting" -- whatever.
You and your minions might view someone who demands facts as being "stressed out" or "ranting" but I view a person like that as striving for truth and striving to keep people who read the web informed with facts. When I saw the blatant propaganda, on a blog site that has the nerve to use "pedia" in their name, I decided to write a factual but firm comment that really had your minions heads spinning. I guess they are not used to people demanding they publish facts instead of propaganda?
This blog you are project editor for, this wiki blog, thinks they're deceiving people into thinking that if they merely use the pedia in their name, that alone will give this wiki blog some kind of kinship and status with the factual encyclopedia -- what a joke that is, this blog is as counterfeit as a $7 dollar bill and equally as dishonest.
I understand now, Editor-man, loud and clear,
on wiki facts are not important
on wiki providing false, misleading info is cool
on wiki doubling spacing is taboo
... I got it- thanks for the insight.
Oh, Editor-man, one more thing, I took a screen shot of that talk page with your admonishment to me on my use of double spacing while you completely ignored the false, misleading information your wiki minions produce. I did that so I can show our students exactly why it is we do not, under any circumstances, allow wiki to be used as a source of information. You know, wiki where facts are just not important - but double spacing is taboo.

sincerely, Betsyrossmadison (talk) 04:48, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi Dennis. From time-to-time I do searches for articles that mention "industry-leading" or "turnkey" and do some janitorial spam cleanup. An IP at: 202.59.231.33 is fighting my cleanup of Synechron by insisting on re-adding copyrighted material from the company website[12] and other spam about its "unyielding commitment to excellence" and being "committed to creating and nurturing a flexible, collaborative and employee friendly culture." Can we block them at this point? CorporateM (Talk) 13:45, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) They haven't edited since your warning (incidentally, WHOIS shows that the IP belongs to Synechron - no surprises there - so I've templated the talkpage accordingly). If they add the information again, a short block would be appropriate, but hopefully the warning will be sufficient. Optimism was ever my failing... Yunshui 雲‍水 13:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Warned on March 4th and spam again on March 11th. Of course the frustrating issue with IPs is if they don't know about the Talk page, there's no way to communicate with them. I've talked to companies who literally say "we have a boilerplate already; why would we re-write it for Wikipedia?" Even copy/paste from the website doesn't necessarily mean bad-faith in the way we think about it. CorporateM (Talk) 14:31, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
As it's a shared IP, it's possible - even likely - that the March 4th edits were made by a different individual, who hadn't seen the warning (it's not inconceivable that more than one person on a corp IP would look their company up on Wikipedia and think, "hey, this isn't anywhere near as thorough as our website - I know how to make it better!"). That said, continued spammary and copyvio isn't doing anyone any favours, and since Dennis is busy building some sort of particle accelerator/time machine/spacecraft at the moment, feel free to ping me if they do it again and I'll have a blockhammer warmed up and ready to go. Dennis - enjoy your science project; try not to disintegrate yourself. Yunshui 雲‍水 14:40, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Will do. Very true - I have seen IPs from my own clients many times, where nobody from marketing actually knew who it was. I wish there was a way to automatically push anyone with an IP address from the company to a Request Edit. A lot of companies have no means to enforce their own hands-off policy on Wikipedia and it gets them into trouble. CorporateM (Talk) 15:14, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Cantaloupe2

Hey Dennis and/or Talk page stalkers. Maybe I can bug you about something else, while I'm here. I just noticed another editor (about the tenth so far) has raised complaints about Cantaloupe2 in the RFCU.[13] The RFCU is now a month and a half old and basically dead, although the editor is apparently still making problems along a similar vein as the RFCU topic. (I'm making assumptions since I haven't investigated the latest dispute) Since Cantaloupe is no longer hounding me it's sort of no longer a concern for me specifically, except for the desire to solve problems generally, but what do you think needs to be done to seek some kind of resolution of the issue? Not really sure what the next step is. CorporateM (Talk) 23:55, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

  • I didn't look at the RFCU as it is early here and I don't know the person, so I have no opinion on them personally. Most RFCUs are closed by an admin then ignored until the community gets pissed off enough to take them to WP:AN or Arbcom and ask for action. RFCU is one of the most toothless venues we have at Wikipedia, but required to bring an Arb case. I've been a vocal critic of it regularly as it currently is more of a "make work" step on the way to arbitration. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 08:00, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
  • That RfC is a nice piece of work. I remember Cantaloupe going by on ANI. Dennis, what happens? This needs to be closed so further infractions are more actionable? I've never closed an RfC/U yet and I'm not particularly looking forward to it, but it is obvious that there are serious hounding, battleground, and civility concerns. Drmies (talk) 15:00, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
    • That is the point, it is often a step that creates no benefit except to justify taking it to the next level, punching a ticket. We need to reform RFC/U so there are some possible sanctions involved, then maybe it will create some change. Right now, there is no reason for anyone called to an RFC to even participate, which is why we end up taking problem users there, but in the two months it takes to do nothing, we end up losing good editors who are tired of the bureaucracy. RFC/U can be more damaging to retention than not going there. There are exceptions, of course. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 17:28, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
      • I rather predicted the outcome would be a ban for Cantaloupe and a round of hand-slaps for the other participants (including myself), since Cantaloupe seems unwilling to reform and prior threats of admin action haven't slowed his pace. Anyways, I should escalate to ArbCom then? I think Dreamyshade is probably all tuckered out on the issue by now and I wanted to push it forward. As you know, it's difficult to get concrete action on anything here ;-) I'll have to start reading the instructions if that's the next step. CorporateM (Talk) 17:56, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
        • You can't ban at RFCU. Or block. Or sanction. That is the problem with RFCU, you can't sanction, you can only discuss. Again, sometimes that is sufficient, but often it is not. Typically, Arbcom wants you to wait and see if the RFCU changes the behavioral issues before filing, to give an honest effort at changing what was brought up at RFCU. Rarely will they take a case the day after an RFCU closes unless the problems got worse during the RFCU process. Again, I haven't looked. I've been on the phone all afternoon with customers, selling them stuff, like the evil capitalist I am ;-) One advantage of having a boss who is a great friend and doesn't care what you do at work as long as you sell product. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 18:25, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
I feel we've met the criteria then. It was discussed at length in the RFCU and the editor is not modifying their behavior or even acknowledging a problem. The RFCU was started in late January. Looking at other ArbCom requests though, they seem focused on a specific article, while this is focused on a pattern of edits from an individual across a large number of articles. Do they do Arbitration for that sort of case? Focused on a person rather than an article? Then again, if Drmies wants to close the RFCU, that would be fine as well, but some resolution/escalation is needed. CorporateM (Talk) 18:43, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Editor of the Week

Hi, Dennis. I am really concerned about the editor of the week project. The above discussion plus a discussion at User talk:Buster7 are really worrying me. I put my two cents in at Buster's page, but my comments apply to the above discussion too. I know you are completely swamped in your PL and I am glad for you for that. I have the opposite problem and will be off-line after this week for the most part. I'll send you an email here shortly with the details, but I am not going to be able to give any input to speak of for anything at all for a few months, just sporatic check-ins here and there. Please feel free to add anything you can to the discussion at buster's page and keep as much an eye on things as you can. Thanks, not only for this and all the other requests of mine you have cheerfully addressed, but for your general confidence in me and all you do for Wikipedia. Your friend, Gtwfan52 (talk) 09:28, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

  • I've carefully planted the seed for the idea of an Editor of the Week, and carefully avoiding interjecting too much into it, since it should come from the community, not from me personally. It looks like you guys are working out the problem, with the understanding that some people aren't wordsmiths and might phrase some things awkwardly. I'm inclined to just sit it out at this point, and let you finish working it out on your own. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 15:06, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Editor disappointed with the world

Something like this, though it's hard to tell now.

Dennis, I don't know where to go with this, so I come to you: you always have an answer. The thing is this: I hate the world, and my life, and Wikipedia, and feet, and my left sock, and everything, because I just stepped on a slug. Is there an antidote? I'm thinking of handing in the bit since I am not sure I can still trust myself. What if I find some mild vandalism in an article in the scope of Wikipedia:WikiProject Gastropods, you know, those sickos that study and love those abominations of slime?? I don't know what to do, Dennis. Drmies (talk) 14:37, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Pour salt on your foot? Writ Keeper (t + c) 14:46, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
At least he didn't become a gastronomical gastropod.
  • Like in all things friend, sometimes there are reasons why things happen. My father used to collect from from the garden and put them in a old coffee can, then add a dash of gasoline and a match when he was done. Seems dramatic, but he acted as judge and executioner, perhaps to dissuade others from following in their footsteps. Perhaps this slug swerved into your path as part of a suicide pact, or maybe he was an evil slug and this was simply karmic retribution. Perhaps you are just a pawn in the game of life, improving the lot for the rest of the slugs by serving this necessary function. These things are simply beyond our understanding and comprehension as mere mortals. The next time you open a 40, go out to the garden, and pour the first swig for your fallen friend. It's ok if you shed a tear, it makes you no less a man. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 15:01, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
    • Lots of useful advice here, Dennis. Writ Keeper, read and learn: your commentary is useless and clearly written by a city slicker. But perhaps you misread me: rather than shed a tear for some fallen friend (let's face, if one is slimy and slides around on the ground, one can't hardly fall much farther) I am more inclined to follow your father's example. Though that would mean touching the suckers. BTW, "footsteps" usually implies it's more than one foot leaving the steps, right? So, better to change the usual word to feetsteps, so we can reserve "footsteps" for those who leave a trail, so to speak. Drmies (talk) 15:27, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
      • Fine, don't listen to me. But when the infection starts to take hold and your foot starts to turn black, glistening, and slimy, and they have to chop it off to keep it from spreading to the rest of your body and turning you into a giant, vaguely-humanoid slug, all because you didn't take the simple preventative measure of using the strongest anti-slug on the market, don't come running to me. Writ Keeper (t + c) 15:35, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
      • I actually whipped up an image of a snail wearing a funeral veil, but then thought that might be just a bit much. And yes, I'm serious. And snails do leave a trail. A nasty, slimy trail that is the basis for many an inappropriate joke. For all intent and purposes, they are a foot with antennas. Maybe I should have said "footstep"; singular. But I pick them up in the garden myself, and just throw them against the wall of one of the barns. I really can't make myself burn them, at least my way is quick and painless and I don't want them killing my plants. Last year, little chipmunks ate all my watermelons, but I have an idea for that. Also, I think we need to stop letting Writ watch horror shows late at night. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 15:38, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
        • Can I tell you how much better I feel? It's like I regained some confidence in the world, Writ Keeper's efforts notwithstanding. And don't think I am just chatting around. I've already blocked and reverted today. Drmies (talk) 15:53, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
          • Good. Sometimes we all just need a little sincere absurdity. I am just chatting around, however, as I've got the phone ringing off the hook, have to go install a computer for the boss's wife's business later today (the things we do in a recession...actually, he is a long time friend, but still...) and my personal life is amazingly hectic. I did comment on Calton's block earlier at ANI, but I'm not drawing any lines in the sand, just saying it's time to move on. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 16:08, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Reminder and update

[14]. Just a couple things. Remember to display your your membership pin proudly. Update: Our weekly that which shall not be spoken of in public meeting in the back hall by the water-cooler has been moved from 3:00 am to 4:00 am - Something about Drmies foot? I think our secretary will be sending out a formal memo by way of the usual super-sekrit mailing list. — Ched :  ?  18:31, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

  • Yeah, I keep Drmies around in case I need someone to act as a patsy, you know, to throw under the bus if things go pear shaped. ;-) Actually, he would have made an excellent Pedro Cabalist. Just the right amount of evil. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 23:51, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

COI Template

I have initiated a discussion at Village Pump Proposals regarding applying Template:COI editnotice more broadly, in order to provide advice from WP:COI directly onto the article Talk page. Your comment, support or opposition is invited. Cheers. CorporateM (Talk) 19:45, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Invitation to join Wikiproject Conflict Resolution

Wikipedia:WikiProject Conflict Resolution.--Amadscientist (talk) 08:57, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 March 2013

Mail

Hello, Dennis Brown. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

RfB?

I know we have discussed this in the past and I was wondering if you have given it any further thought? I know you are a busy man right now, but might you give it a try when/if things slow down? AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 01:46, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

  • Honestly, I haven't really thought about it except when asked. The economy has taken a toll on business, which ironically means I have to work more hours, being in marketing. I've been mainly focused on finding new products, to keep people from getting laid off at work. Most of them have been here 12 or more years, and it would be impossible to find comparable paying jobs. I've had a little spare time the last week or so, but the next couple of months are going to be brutal for overtime. It's the biggest challenge I've had in the 19+ years I've been in this industry, and I'm not as young as I used to be. For now, real life gets the lion's share of my attention, so it wouldn't be fair to anyone if I entertained any new challenges here. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 10:29, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

User:MegaCyanide666 is back for more

[15], probably has a new account somewhere. --Niemti (talk) 22:06, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

The IP has been taken care of. No evidence so far of a "new account" though. FYI. Sergecross73 msg me 01:10, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Perfection not

"If we are to believe that adminship should be granted to anyone that has sufficient experience and has demonstrated a high level of trust and clue (and hopefully we do believe that), then Jasper is a perfect fit for the admin corp, and I'm hopeful the community will agree." (Dennis Brown). If your assessment of perfection were applied to maintenance of a commercial aircraft, I wouldn't step on-board; it would probably crash & burn at take-off. Ihardlythinkso (talk) 03:54, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

There's a couple of reasons we use Dennis' assessment here. First, editors are volunteers, while aircraft maintenance men and women are paid for the job they do. Second, anything done on Wikipedia can be undone. Editors and administrators do not need to be flawless. Ryan Vesey 03:59, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
No one is perfect/flawless, everyone knows that, nobody sensible asserts that; to base argument on same is bogus. Whether paid or not is irrelevant -- it was a fatally flawed judgement/assessment. "Anything done on Wikipedia can be undone" is not true. (See [16].) Ihardlythinkso (talk) 05:43, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Further Help with User:Strebe

Hi Dennis--

I'm a new editor, and you responded to a request of mine on the Administrator's noticeboard regarding what I felt was abusive behavior of User:Strebe toward me that has resulted from a dispute over the content of the Map Projection page.

You left a mild and reasonable rebuke on his Talk page, but it does not seem to have had an effect, and I was wondering if a further step could be taken to prevent him from making personal attacks on me. I understand that I am new to Wikipedia but I am working in good faith and have taken care to follow policies for disputes with editors.

I would refer you to the follow evidence:

"You are silly for calling it silly, and you know you are silly for calling it silly. That makes you a troll." (MP Talk page) "Stop trolling" (MP Talk page) "You are obstinately misapplying terms from another domain. You are trolling. You are wasting everyone’s time, including your own. Go away. " (MP Talk page) I am "blather[ing]" (MP Talk page) I "simply [do] not understand English or the topic well enough" (in fact, I'm a native English speaker and a mathematician). (MP Talk page)

We are making good progress on the dispute so I don't understand why he continues to lob insults at me. I'm just trying to do the right thing on that one page, but I have to be honest, I'm not inclined to work more on the site if this is the typical behavior.

Cf. also http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Map_projection184.186.8.148 (talk) 07:55, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Observation #60 from User:Antandrus/observations on Wikipedia behavior may be applicable here; to wit:

"The best way to continue as a writing Wikipedian for many years is to be 'indifferent to both praise and blame.' Indifference to praise is a hard task for mere humans, but millions of potential anonymous readers demand it of you, for if you require praise you will burn out..."

Point: Be a honey badger. Ignore the drama. Just edit. Works for me. Cheers, DoctorJoeE review transgressions/talk to me! 13:21, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Ah, no, you're making a mistake here--I don't require, nor want, praise. I do require, and want, a basic level of kindness and respect for alternate viewpoints. If one does not find that here I 'm not going to keep editing.184.186.8.148 (talk) 17:17, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) I'm afraid that no one can guarantee you an aggravation-free WP experience. The relevant quote was, "...be indifferent to both praise and blame." Let me try to clarify: No one likes being attacked, here or anywhere else, but it happens -- and the best response, in my experience, is to walk away. Not easily done, but a real time-saver. Attacks and counter-attacks are hazardous to your mental health. The best and most frequently offered Administrative advice is to move on -- or as one of my favorite admins puts it, "go fishing" -- and return the next day. Most Wikipedians are indeed respectful of alternate viewpoints, but some are not -- and if you do continue to edit, you will bump into a troll or bully every now and then. Don't take it personally; be patient and remain courteous and civil, even if you feel know you are right. Once again, ignore the drama. Just edit. Cheers, DoctorJoeE review transgressions/talk to me! 23:14, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Well put. As hard as we try, we can't force everyone to be "polite", some of the nicest guys have bad days as well. It is like a bar or pub, some people are nice, some are not so nice, some are dicks. You can't ask the manager to kick out everyone who is acting a little dickish, it is just best to walk away when you can. As an admin, I get more dickish email and comments than you would imagine, I just let it roll off my back. They don't know me, so their value judgement isn't very valuable or enlightened. As long as it doesn't interfere with my daily activities, I just move on and find nicer people to interact with, just like I would at a pub or bar. If it is a major problem, then we "bouncers" get involved, but it is better to not try to police minor incivility as it tends to just make matters more uncivil. People are what people are. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 23:48, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Well, my brief foray into editing Wikipedia has come to an end. I have no disputes with the process; only with the behavior of the community. I don't deserve personal attacks, nor do other good faith editors. I tried to argue my views in a sound fashion, calmly, and in accordance with established policy.
I cannot, alas, recommend Wikipedia to my students, but I do wish you the best.184.186.8.148 (talk) 02:01, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Almost like he wasn't listening, n'est-ce pas? DoctorJoeE review transgressions/talk to me! 00:14, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

USS Scorpion (SSN-589)

Hi Dennis, Apologies for interupting your busy schedule, but I would be grateful for your advice on the correspondence on my Talk Page and on Sponsianus Talk Page regarding USS Scorpion (SSN-589). It appears that Sponsianus is intending to restore his edit which I reverted on 19 June 2012. The reason for my reversion was that the entry appeared to be "trivia", not verfied and that the book by Neville Shute referred to had come-out long before the vessel was in service. I am concerned that the information that this editor is quoting is not verifiable and he is threatning to revert back to his June 2012 edit. Your opinion would be much valued. Best regards, David. David J Johnson (talk) 23:50, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

  • Problem is that I'm working 12 hour days, plus time for research and even working Saturdays. I haven't been on for over a day to even reply to notes. Of course, hopefully a stalker will pick this up and take a look. By summer, things should get more slack for me at work. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 10:58, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

I want minions, too

Where do I send in my order? You seem to have a flock[17] so I'm guessing you're the expert. KillerChihuahua 02:38, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Is training them difficult and do we need to dress them in little suits and hats like flying monkeys? If so...sounds expensive.--Amadscientist (talk) 03:40, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
I thought you just had to save up enough boxtops. I didn't know you had to train and dress them. KillerChihuahua 03:52, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
I don't want naked minions....wait........OK no.--Amadscientist (talk) 03:56, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
My services are available, reasonable rates, I am qualified to perform the following roles: minion, yes-man, henchman, lackey, flunkie and bootlicker. References available on request. Nudity negotiable like everything else. Zad68 03:59, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
These minions are much more humourous, and yet somehow actually get things done (✉→BWilkins←✎) 08:28, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
If only in over powering a Google image search under "minions" LOL!--Amadscientist (talk) 08:43, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
LOL, at least they're overpowering something! KillerChihuahua 09:44, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Now, if anyone has time to get me some mignon instead of minion, I'm 100% up for that too! (✉→BWilkins←✎) 10:32, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
There are other minions, Bwilkins - I think my preference is already taken, unfortunately. Zad68, that was too funny! I'd ask where to send my boxtops, but I think it might be misunderstood. KillerChihuahua 09:44, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
I treat my minions as equals, so we are really more of a Cabal. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 10:56, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Minion job opening? I'm in. (Didn't know moonlighting was allowed!) Available for any of the following:

  • Wars Fought
  • Revolutions Started
  • Assassinations Plotted
  • Governments Run
  • Uprisings Quelled
  • Tigers Tamed
  • Bars Emptied
  • Computers Verified
  • Orgies Organized
  • ...and, of course, the ever-popular Stud Service.

I can also supply used cars, land, whiskey, manure, nails, fly swatters, racing forms, and on occasion, bongos (during season). I will NOT, however, wear the little suit and hat...unless the price is right. Awaiting your calls... DoctorJoeE review transgressions/talk to me! 13:00, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Shall we start a Crusade, my liege? Has thy honor been besmirched? Shall we go forth into the Land of Wiki and lay waste to your enemies? We await your charge! ```Buster Seven Talk 13:13, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
The sad thing is, there are a few here who really think that this is how it is, rather than the reality of us being like-minded and singularly focused. Remember kids, at Wikipedia, when two people agree, it is a Cabal. When they disagree, someone must be blocked. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 14:57, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Does this mean that I don't get my forest green Merry Man suit? DoctorJoeE review transgressions/talk to me! 15:08, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Wow, I could have gone all day without that visual burning into my mind... :o Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 15:14, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Wait, does this mean DoctorJoeE has a secret identity? KillerChihuahua 19:01, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Shh . . . more of an identity crisis, actually...
"Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask and he will tell you the truth." (Oscar Wilde) DoctorJoeE review transgressions/talk to me! 19:17, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Ooh, good quote. I'll have to make a note of that; I've noticed the effect myself. It is a companion to the observation that "Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by, and the only thing that's wrong is to get caught." -- J.C. Watts When one is anonymous, one's character tends to show through a bit more clearly. The Online disinhibition effect has shown that many people are more caring, or more hateful, than they act when they have no "mask". KillerChihuahua 19:32, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
On a more practical note, it's the reason why we're such jerks to each other in cars and do things to others that we would never do if we were interacting face-to-face instead of through windshields. Zad68 19:40, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
That might explain my attitude. I've met a number of people in real life that I first met online. From the online gaming community to Berean Hunter, another admin and friend here at Wikipedia. I really try to treat everyone like they might move next door to me next month. Then again, I use my real name and don't hide where I live. I think that has a way of keeping me honest, and trying to keep my words sweet. Of course, not everyone feels they can be so open, and I understand that. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 21:03, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
The most cynical (and therefore my favorite) quote on this subject: "Conscience is the inner voice that warns us that somebody may be looking." (H.L. Mencken) DoctorJoeE review transgressions/talk to me! 21:06, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
One of my favorites is from J.C. Watts, "Character is doing the right thing even when nobody's looking". ;) Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 23:16, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
I don't know...I'm kinda liking: " Remember kids, at Wikipedia, when two people agree, it is a Cabal. When they disagree, someone must be blocked. - Dennis Brown". Love it. LOL!--Amadscientist (talk) 02:16, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Wait a second, does that mean that the whole entire Arbcom is a cabal? There are definitely >2 people in Arbcom, and when they make a decision, a lot of them agree...
THE TRUTH HAS BEEN REVEALED! Thekillerpenguin (talk) 04:13, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dennis_Brown/Archive_19&oldid=1089758111"