User talk:Deepak Digamber Pathak

This is Deepak Digamber Pathak's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Deepak Digamber Pathak/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Deepak Digamber Pathak/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:35, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Deepak Digamber Pathak! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 19:35, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note on adding unsourced content

Hey, I'm Flooded with them hundreds. I noticed that you added content to an article but didn't provide a reliable source. You should cite a reliable source for all of your edits so that they can be verified. In Wikipedia, verifiability means that other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Adding unsourced content contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial.

Wikipedia does not publish original research, which refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. The verifiability policy requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations, anywhere in article space. Articles should be based on reliable and published sources (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view) and if no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.

Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Flooded with them hundreds 14:44, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Deepak Digamber Pathak

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Deepak Digamber Pathak, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. theinstantmatrix (talk) 14:51, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Deepak Digamber Pathak.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Deepak Digamber Pathak.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 16:00, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Deepak Digamber Pathak.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Deepak Digamber Pathak.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 16:46, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

why is the article being deleted since it doesn't contain any links or something which needs to be suspicious and needs to be deleted.

Speedy deletion nomination of Deepak Digamber Pathak

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Deepak Digamber Pathak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 10:16, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Deepak Digamber Pathak

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Deepak Digamber Pathak, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. theinstantmatrix (talk) 12:02, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid you'll most likely be facing a block when all you do is to keep writing your own promotional autobiography, rather than contributing to the encyclopedia. theinstantmatrix (talk) 12:06, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Deepak Digamber Pathak/sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:Deepak Digamber Pathak/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kleuske (talk) 16:24, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What wikipedia is WP:NOT

Hi. This is Wikipedia. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not facebook and not a business directory. At some point an actual contribution is expected. Please keep that in mind when editing. Thanks. Kleuske (talk) 16:27, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, By keeping in mind i have created this page as i am the CEO of company and for my company i too need the wikipedia page so before starting with that iI asked my content writer to create the page for me and my Company.

Hope there wont be issue in that to list the Company and CEO of the company in Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deepak Digamber Pathak (talk • contribs)

If you were the Queen of Sheba, that still would not change a thing. Wikipedia was not created to suit your business needs. CEO's of non-notable firms are a dime a dozen, here. Kleuske (talk) 18:07, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:13, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Deepak Digamber Pathak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22715 was submitted on Sep 19, 2018 18:52:50. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:52, 19 September 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Deepak Digamber Pathak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22716 was submitted on Sep 19, 2018 19:17:41. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:17, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Hi. I've had a read over this page and your two unblock requests to WP:UTRS, and I think you might need a bit more explanation of the conditions under which Wikipedia would carry an article about a company and/or about a CEO.

Firstly, Wikipedia does not exist for companies to tell the world about themselves. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia (click that link if you are not sure what one of those is) and does not work like Facebook or any other social media site. Wikipedia is not a company directory and is not a platform to be used for digital marketing, and the mere existence of a company does not mean it qualifies for a Wikipedia article.

For a company to qualify for a Wikipedia article it would need to satisfy the minimum notability requirements of WP:NCORP and would need to be supported by multiple independent reliable source (see WP:RS) covering the company in depth. And, ideally, an article about a company would be written by a disinterested third party and not by any agent of the company - Wikipedia's policies on Conflict of Interest and Paid editing are relevant here.

The same goes for yourself as a CEO - have a read of WP:NPERSON to learn about the notability requirements for a person to qualify for a Wikipedia article.

Finally, having considered what you have said about your company, I really do not see that it satisfies WP:NCORP at the moment, and in my opinion it does not qualify for a Wikipedia encyclopedia article. But I wish you success, and I look forward to your company growing to become sufficiently notable for Wikipedia. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:47, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]