User talk:Deebs90

Welcome!

Hello, Deebs90, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 09:22, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deebs90, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Deebs90! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:25, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Interlude (Interactive Video) (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

j⚛e decker ^talk 16:40, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Interlude (Interactive Video) (October 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Interlude (Interactive Video) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 09:22, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Deebs90. You have new messages at Timtrent's talk page.
Message added 22:01, 23 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Fiddle Faddle 22:01, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:JaneR Tribeca.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:JaneR Tribeca.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Interlude (Interactive Video) (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Interlude (Interactive Video) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 14:36, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Deebs90

I see you waited 6 weeks for a review, after spending months on the Draft, and trying to follow the first turn away's recommendation in a prima facie way, but the language used doesn't actually have it's common sense meaning, it's being used technically. Sorry. I'm not sure if the subsequent technical explanation of why it was not advanced made full sense to you either, but let's not stir up things. I think I can help a bit, and I've started some edits. There are is also wp:article rescue squadron and a number of other resources that can be called on if you need. I need to take a break now, but I'll get back to it later, although I have other things going on as well. FeatherPluma (talk) 22:44, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NYT and Israel Times have the type of sourcing being sought, and have been cited. Informally, and with promising anything, I think with a bit more effort it will meet / exceed the guidelines. FeatherPluma (talk) 04:04, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Interlude (interactive video) (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was:

Sources include primary sources, press releases, passing mentions etc. language is not neural such as " received a multitude of awards and recognitions", at least one paragraph (deleted) was directly copied from a copyrighted source, written in a promotional tone. Please read WP:NOTINHERITED.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Interlude (interactive video) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Flat Out (talk) 04:29, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deebs90 I am going to come back to your article within the next day or two and clean it up so it is ready to advance to mainspace. FeatherPluma (talk) 00:37, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, by breaking it down, it's a big mess right now, but I am sure it will come together nicely on the flip side. Think Property Brothers, or some such. FeatherPluma (talk) 04:19, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deebs90 I followed the AfC recommendations, step by step. I trimmed from 16683 bytes to 12760 bytes, some of which is hidden text, that can probably be removed. Having extensively followed the reviewers' suggestions, rather than submitting through another AfC review, I advanced the article to mainspace as it now seems reasonable for dissemination. This will also avail it of a greater use pool for any upgrading needed. Because I sidestepped further AfC input, I hatted the text as a new article, for procedural transparency and also to promote review. If you have a moment, please check that I did not inadvertently introduce errors in my modifications. Please also make any changes or improvements you like. If you have time, I would like to hear your feedback on the present formulation of the article. Regards. FeatherPluma (talk) 18:06, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]