User talk:Davidmagee9

Welcome!

Hello, Davidmagee9, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Osh literacy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dai Pritchard (talk) 13:50, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Osh literacy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Osh literacy. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Occupational safety and health. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Occupational safety and health – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Dai Pritchard (talk) 13:50, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Osh literacy (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lixxx235 was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Osh literacy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 18:30, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Davidmagee9, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 18:30, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Osh literacy concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Osh literacy, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Osh literacy

Hello, Davidmagee9. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Osh literacy".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:45, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Occupational Health Literacy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Occupational Health Literacy. Thanks! Turnagra (talk) 20:23, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I left a message. OSH literacy has been scrutinised and declared an important key skill life-literacy by the Institute of Occupational Safety and Health and The World literacy Summit and many other global organisations. It fits all parameters to be classed as a literacy equal to financial literacy, computer literacy etc. These can be taught or identified as stand alone areas, but you must have the correct literacy levels to access and navigate them well. You must have the required 'literacy' levels to identify and decode OSH information. If you need any further information, please let me know. Thanks, Dave Davidmagee9 (talk) 05:45, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Occupational Health Literacy has been accepted

Occupational Health Literacy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Turnagra (talk) 06:02, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Please, you did not call the article Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) literacy. There is a difference between Health literacy, which focus on the worker's 'health' as opposed to occupational safety and health (OSH) which focuses more on the hazards and risks. Please change this as soon as possible please. There is a difference and OSH literacy has been recognised as being different to health literacy. Thank you.

Davidmagee9 (talk) 14:25, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Turnagra, The main article refers to OSH literacy, but the title is Occupational Health. The title should be OSH literacy, please. Thank you. Dave Davidmagee9 (talk) 14:30, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest and failure to disclose

Hello, Davidmagee9. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Occupational Safety and Health Literacy, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:31, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Mike for the info. I will leave it alone then. I only speak English!

Thanks again,

Dave 5.246.211.243 (talk) 08:59, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]