Jump to content

User talk:L235

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user helped get "Blueford v. Arkansas" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 3 March 2018.
This user helped get "Lafler v. Cooper" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 12 April 2018.
This user helped get "Napue v. Illinois" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 4 September 2018.
This user helped get "Regents of University of California v. United States Department of Homeland Security" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 2 February 2018.
This user helped get "Sessions v. Dimaya" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 8 May 2018.
This user helped get "United States v. Forty-Three Gallons of Whiskey" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 1 April 2018.
This user wrote "Lafler v. Cooper" which became a good article on 3 July 2018.
This user is a member of the Arbitration Committee on the English Wikipedia.
This user has CheckUser privileges on the English Wikipedia.
This user has oversight privileges on the English Wikipedia.
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Lixxx235)


Voting to ratify the Wikimedia Movement Charter is now open – cast your vote[edit]

Copied from Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) § Voting to ratify the Wikimedia Movement Charter is now open – cast your vote because this page is listed on Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Subscribe.
You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Hello everyone,

The voting to ratify the Wikimedia Movement Charter is now open. The Wikimedia Movement Charter is a document to define roles and responsibilities for all the members and entities of the Wikimedia movement, including the creation of a new body – the Global Council – for movement governance.

The final version of the Wikimedia Movement Charter is available on Meta in different languages and attached here in PDF format for your reading.

Voting commenced on SecurePoll on June 25, 2024 at 00:01 UTC and will conclude on July 9, 2024 at 23:59 UTC. Please read more on the voter information and eligibility details.

After reading the Charter, please vote here and share this note further.

If you have any questions about the ratification vote, please contact the Charter Electoral Commission at cec@wikimedia.org.

On behalf of the CEC,

RamzyM (WMF) 10:51, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A humble request[edit]

Hi, Kevin! I'm glad to see that you are still active at WP and involved in so many areas. It's been a long time, but I am sure that you are thriving in your offline life, on top of all you do at WP.

I'm writing to ask you for a small favor. It happens that another editor and I have been working on separate articles on the same subject: a current California wildfire known as the Post Fire. I was working on Post Fire (although I didn't create it), while he was working on Post Fire (2024), which he did create. The articles should be merged and I have forgotten how to do that. Would you be willing to undertake it?

Here's the story: The other user, Dripwoods, created the article Post Fire (2024). Some days later he discovered the pre-existence of Post Fire and posted on its talk page. We agreed the articles should be merged. His article, Post Fire (2024), is much more detailed, so we believe it should be the surviving article. The other article, Post Fire, had some more recent updates, so I have moved that material to Post Fire (2024). I think the information is now in one place. Next step?

IMO the title "Post Fire" should be given to the larger and more complete article, which is currently known as Post Fire (2024). Not sure how to do that. Would "Post Fire (2024)" become a redirect to Post Fire? Sounds messy. Alternatively, we could just delete the lesser article "Post Fire" (maybe first move the talk page discussion to the other talk page?) and then change the name of "Post Fire (2024)" to "Post Fire".

The problem is, I am years away from doing anything like that and am clueless where to begin. So I thought maybe I could (pretty please) get you to do the honors? What do you think on that subject? Do you have time to set this up?

In any case, nice to "see" you again! MelanieN (talk) 03:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MelanieN: Great to hear from you! I've swapped the two pages (so what was previously "Post Fire (2024)" is now "Post Fire", and vice versa), so the more detailed article's survived. Then I've redirected the new "Post Fire (2024)" to the other article, and added the necessary tags etc. Assuming you've gotten everything you needed to keep into the new article, I think we're all set! KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 14:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much, Kevin! I could never have figured all that out. -- MelanieN (talk) 14:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]