User talk:Davidaryan

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

davidaryan (talk · contribs) has been paid by RSP Automotive & Industrial Pty. Ltd..

Welcome!

Hello, Davidaryan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Begoon 01:19, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Non-free content

Hi. Per WP:NFCC #9 - non-free images may not be used outside article space (and only in the article(s) for which a valid rationale is present). Please don't add or re-add non-free images to non-article pages. Our non-free content rules are strictly enforced to protect our mission as providers of freely re-usable content.

The image may be added to the article when/if the draft is approved and the page has been moved to article space. If the image has been deleted as an orphan by that time then it may be re-uploaded at that point or you may then request undeletion at WP:REFUND. For these reasons it is generally preferable and more convenient to only upload non-free content once the target article is approved and in place. Thank you. -- Begoon 01:31, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note that, when I looked at this again, it seemed to me that, rather than non-free content as you had uploaded it, {{PD-textlogo}} was appropriate for this image, so I've amended the licensing tags and replaced the usage in your draft. -- Begoon 02:57, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Davidaryan. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.

I'm assuming that you are the "David Ryan" mentioned in the draft, therefore I'm sending you this information.
Preparing and submitting a draft, as you are doing, is a reasonable way to approach this, but you do need to read the linked material regarding paid/COI contributions.

Begoon 01:45, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just quickly glancing at your draft, I should probably also point out WP:NOTDIRECTORY, particularly #7, before you waste too much time creating an extensive list of services/products/makes/models which will not be suitable content. -- Begoon 01:53, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Davidaryan/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Davidaryan/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:37, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Davidaryan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:37, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Davidaryan/sandbox

Hello, Davidaryan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:08, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Rare Spares Logo.png

The file File:Rare Spares Logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for User:Davidaryan/sandbox. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:03, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]