User talk:Davida002

Welcome!

Hello, Davida002, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as 1968 Olympic and Paralympic medal table, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Mr X 13:51, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Davida002, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Davida002! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to 1960 Summer Olympics medal table, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Jonas kam (talk) 04:45, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to 1964 Summer Olympics medal table. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Jonas kam (talk) 04:46, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1968 Olympic and Paralympic medal table for deletion

Hello. A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1968 Olympic and Paralympic medal table is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1968 Olympic and Paralympic medal table until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, please do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thank you. - Mr X 13:50, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Runcorn, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 10:04, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Runcorn. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Charles (talk) 14:27, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Runcorn

You should read BRD and stop addi8ng material which others disagree with about climate data on Runcorn. If you persist in this slow-motion edit-war, you may find your ability to edit is restricted. Please discuss the issue on Talk:Runcorn instead of repeatedly re-adding the material. DDStretch (talk) 07:52, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Runcorn. Charles (talk) 21:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. : Noyster (talk), 11:09, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Deb (talk) 11:11, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Runcorn. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Class455 (talk) 14:55, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DDStretch (talk) 20:33, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have taken this step, despite Class455's previous post, because you have been warned multiple times already, and have displayed no attempt to change your behaviour. Unless you give an undertaking to change, and do so, you will face increasing block lengths when you disrupt Runcorn and don't engage in polite discussion about any changes you wish to make on the article's talk page! DDStretch (talk) 20:37, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, I'm Mutt Lunker. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Leadhills have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mutt Lunker (talk) 00:40, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chester. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mutt Lunker (talk) 00:44, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to London. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --David Biddulph (talk) 00:24, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at London. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DDStretch (talk) 02:50, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User page & user talk page moved in error

I reverted your move of this page and your user page. If you want your account to be renamed, see WP:Rename. --David Biddulph (talk) 20:24, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]