Jump to content

User talk:Das osmnezz/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability (again)

[edit]

Once again, a footballer is only notable if they play in a competitive match in a fully professional league. Just playing for a team that plays in an FPL is not enough. And I'm also concerned about the tone of some of the articles, such as Esoh Omogba, which has phrases like "Representing the Afemai, one of the most ubiquitous ethnic groups", "Omogba provided a transcendent performance for the team in a facile 5-0 triumph". This is not encyclopedic, and you've been blocked for it before. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:28, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanctions Alert

[edit]
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Ad Orientem (talk) 14:16, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Final Warning

[edit]

Hi Das osmnezz. It appears that many of the same issues for which you have been repeatedly blocked in the past are continuing. In particular your creation of articles about non-notable individuals and your use of un-encyclopedic language words and phrases. As a consequence I must warn you formally that if this continues you will either be blocked indefinitely per WP:CIR or subject to very stringent editing restrictions per the above notice. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:38, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chadrac Akolo

[edit]

Hi Das osmnezz, thank you for your recent edit to Chadrac Akolo. However in the edit you forgot to update the date line at the end of the infobox as well. See this edit as an example if it makes anything clearer. Thanks and happy editing Inter&anthro (talk) 05:38, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice: You Are Now Subject to Editing Restrictions

[edit]

stop Per my earlier notice regarding discretionary sanctions and my final warning, both posted above, and due to your continued demonstration of problematic editing on BLPs, I am placing you under the following editing restrictions with immediate effect...

  • You may not directly create any article about a living or recently deceased person as defined by BLP in the mainspace of the project. Any proposed new pages must be submitted as a WP:DRAFT to WP:AFC for review and approval.
  • You may not make any edit to any article about a living or recently deceased soccer/football player without first having the edit proposed on the talk page of the article and then reviewed and approved by at least one editor with extended confirmed rights. When making an edit to a BLP article subject to this restriction you will name the editor who reviewed and approved your edit in the edit summary.

These editing restrictions shall remain in place for a period of one year from this date, after which your editing history will be reviewed to determine if the restrictions should be extended, modified or lifted. If any aspect of the above editing restrictions is unclear, let me know and I will clarify them. You are free to remove this notice from your talk page along with any other notices or warnings with the exception of your most recent unblock request. However, be aware that the restrictions remain in place until such time as you are informed by someone with arbitration enforcement competency that they have been modified or removed. This measure is being taken with great reluctance. However based on your editing history, which has included multiple blocks based on WP:CIR concerns, it appears to be the only step short of an indefinite block that will curb your poor editing habits. Finally these restrictions are being logged at WP:AEL and any breach may result in your being blocked, very likely indefinitely. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:13, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ad Orientem can we discuss this editing restriction? It has been in place over 4 months now and is causing a bit of an AfC issue. AfC keeps reviewing drafts but there are now around 130 of these piled up unreviewed User:Das_osmnezz#List_of_drafts_created. AfC lacks football specialists or any way to categorize by topic, so I'm constantly running into football drafts I don't want to touch because I can't distinguish between RS for this narrow topic or if someone meets WP:FOOTY or not. Of course AfC is short of volunteers with an 8 week backlog. AfC is also under intense scrutiny because of WP:ACREQ. 130/2,154=6% of the backlog, or 4-5 days worth of our older unreviewed submissions, which is where most of these sit see Category:AfC_pending_submissions_by_age.

Since the editing restriction involves posting proposed changes to talkpages and getting (presumably) football savvy editors to approve the changes, how about you require User:Das_osmnezz to post his Drafts right on the Football WikiProject for subject matter experts to check, improve and move to mainspace or seek deletion on as necessary? Forget tagging for AfC, and remove the AfC tags from all the pending drafts. I believe this plan would cut the AfC backlog immediately, allowing us to deal with actual new editors in a more timely manner, while getting the right editors reviewing, improving and moving the Drafts. Can you buy into that idea? Legacypac (talk) 10:03, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of drafts created

[edit]

This is a list of drafts I have created (abiding to my editing restrictions); all of them are still pending so administrators may feel free to review them and move them at any point.Das osmnezz (talk) 00:01, 21 November 2017 (UTC) note: the list will grow pretty quickly.[reply]

Please see WP:DRAFTS for useful hints and creation guides. Also Draft review is not restricted to Admins. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:51, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ad Orientem: can you please show me the template for accepting a draft? Thanks.Das osmnezz (talk) 00:13, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Actually there is a process for review which is explained at WP:AFC, though not always in the clearest language. Also there is a special script which is used by AFC reviewers that allows them to do everything with a few clicks. Once a draft is reviewed the author is more or less automatically notified. There is a button on the script that allows for publication, decline or comment. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:30, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

[edit]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Das osmnezz. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ismaël Benahmed has been accepted

[edit]
Ismaël Benahmed, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:28, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of FC Soualiga

[edit]

Hello, Das osmnezz. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, FC Soualiga, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Babymissfortune 15:01, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve SV Estrellas

[edit]

Hi, I'm Babymissfortune. Das osmnezz, thanks for creating SV Estrellas!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please expand this page if you can find references. Thanks.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Babymissfortune 15:10, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Argzim Redzovic

[edit]

A user, Qifahs17 has basically copy-and-pasted my Draft:Argzim Redžović into article space. Is this allowed by any means?

I'm looking into this. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK I deleted the copy paste article per CSD A10 and moved your draft into the mainspace. I think your draft looks OK to me. Let me know if there are any more issues. -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:56, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question

[edit]

Hi Das osmnezz. Have you actually submitted any of your drafts to AfC? You need to add the {{subst:submit}} template to your draft to move into the AfC queue. Just copy and paste that to the top of any drafts you want reviewed at AfC. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:51, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Islam Batran has been accepted

[edit]
Islam Batran, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 02:24, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Koen Bosma (February 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kb.au was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but this player doesn't yet meet WP:NSOCCER. No indication that they pass WP:GNG either.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Kb.au (talk) 05:56, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello, Das osmnezz! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kb.au (talk) 05:56, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Masanari Omura has been accepted

[edit]
Masanari Omura, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kb.au (talk) 05:58, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Clay Silvas

[edit]

Hello, Das osmnezz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Clay Silvas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jamie Pitt (February 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Doesn't seem to meet sporting notability criteria.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Drover's Wife (talk) 23:50, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tony Buesnel has been accepted

[edit]
Tony Buesnel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Drover's Wife (talk) 23:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Pawiak (February 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Doesn't seem to meet sporting notability criteria.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Drover's Wife (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keegan Nash (February 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Doesn't seem to meet sporting notability criteria.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Drover's Wife (talk) 23:54, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ian Gillan (football coach) (February 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Drover's Wife (talk) 23:56, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Koen Bosma has been accepted

[edit]
Koen Bosma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Drover's Wife (talk) 23:59, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bradley Groves (February 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Doesn't seem to meet sporting notability criteria.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Drover's Wife (talk) 00:00, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nebojsa Vukosavljevic has been accepted

[edit]
Nebojsa Vukosavljevic, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Drover's Wife (talk) 00:01, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Bennett (soccer player) (February 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No claim to notability apart from the Singaporean league, which doesn't have the sources to back it up.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Drover's Wife (talk) 00:02, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chimaobi Nwaogazi has been accepted

[edit]
Chimaobi Nwaogazi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Drover's Wife (talk) 00:05, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bradley Groves has been accepted

[edit]
Bradley Groves, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kb.au (talk) 00:15, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lee Sterrey (February 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails to make any claim of notability in the article body: a three-sentence article in which one sentence is about him dropping a player one time is an argument against notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Drover's Wife (talk) 09:57, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jamie Pitt has been accepted

[edit]
Jamie Pitt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kb.au (talk) 11:51, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kingsley Njoku has been accepted

[edit]
Kingsley Njoku, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kb.au (talk) 11:55, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adam Mitter has been accepted

[edit]
Adam Mitter, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kb.au (talk) 11:59, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ian Gillan (football coach) has been accepted

[edit]
Ian Gillan (football coach), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kb.au (talk) 12:12, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Bennett (soccer player) has been accepted

[edit]
Peter Bennett (soccer player), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kb.au (talk) 12:15, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hengthaveephokasub Panuwat (February 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
EROS message 13:07, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Viban Francis Bayong (February 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
EROS message 13:08, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emmanuel Unaka (February 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
EROS message 13:09, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erich Bürzle (February 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
EROS message 14:20, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Idris Mbombo has been accepted

[edit]
Idris Mbombo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:28, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elvist Ciku (February 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Legacypac (talk) 02:48, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abu Desmond Mansaray (February 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Legacypac (talk) 03:26, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erich Bürzle (February 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No change since last decline
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Legacypac (talk) 03:43, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christian Koaneti (February 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:50, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keigo Moriyasu (February 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Number 57 was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:NFOOTY as has never played in a fully-professional league.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Number 57 22:31, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lee Sterrey (February 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Drover's Wife (talk) 04:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tom Kelly (Irish footballer) has been accepted

[edit]
Tom Kelly (Irish footballer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Joseph2302 (talk) 20:50, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mauro Boerchio (February 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joseph2302 was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not played in a fully professional league.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Joseph2302 (talk) 20:52, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mauro Boerchio has been accepted

[edit]
Mauro Boerchio, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Joseph2302 (talk) 21:08, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lee Sterrey (February 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kb.au was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
May meet WP:NFOOTY, but the article doesn't at all discuss his position that would lead to this presumed notability. Subject specific notability guidelines are merely rules of thumb and not hard and fast rules guaranteeing inclusion. The article should at least discuss a claim of significance.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Kb.au (talk) 05:38, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emmanuel Unaka has been accepted

[edit]
Emmanuel Unaka, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Pawiak has been accepted

[edit]
Andrew Pawiak, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:17, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hengthaveephokasub Panuwat has been accepted

[edit]
Hengthaveephokasub Panuwat, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abu Desmond Mansaray has been accepted

[edit]
Abu Desmond Mansaray, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:22, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elvist Ciku has been accepted

[edit]
Elvist Ciku, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:22, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Erich Bürzle has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Erich Bürzle. Thanks! Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:25, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erich Bürzle has been accepted

[edit]
Erich Bürzle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:25, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ranaldo Bailey has been accepted

[edit]
Ranaldo Bailey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

L293D (☎ • ✎) 00:18, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

[edit]

I see that a large number of your drafts have been accepted. Well done. -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:40, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Viban Francis Bayong has been accepted

[edit]
Viban Francis Bayong, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:45, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

draft Deletion

[edit]

Could anyone please delete the draft below Draft:Dik Buitelaar (see Contributions because I do not want to make the draft and its a typo but already published it. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 03:14, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done It looks like there was some confusion but I have deleted Draft:Dick Buitelaar. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:10, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashar Bernardus (February 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 05:22, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Tshamala Kabanga

[edit]

Hi, I'm Cwmhiraeth. Das osmnezz, thanks for creating Tshamala Kabanga!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article is not written in an encyclopedic style.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:13, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kamal Shrestha has been accepted

[edit]
Kamal Shrestha, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:38, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oscar Amaro de Silva has been accepted

[edit]
Oscar Amaro de Silva, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:40, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rickey Harris has been accepted

[edit]
Rickey Harris, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:40, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Jcc. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I've been reviewing your drafts and whilst notable, I'm slightly taken by your seeming lack of understanding of what constitutes a reliable source, especially given that you've been editing for some time. You should really read WP:RELIABLE. jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:42, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also article tone is still unencyclopedic sometimes. Phrases like "Harris had a transient stint there, getting dropped from the roster due to inconsistent playing time." are not wanted. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:43, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Radoy Minkovski (February 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Chetsford (talk) 04:27, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lee Sterrey (February 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kb.au was:
Nothing changed since previous decline.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Kb.au (talk) 14:11, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lee Sterrey (February 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Per Kb.au's comments of 16 February and 26 February. Please stop resubmitting until you've actually properly addressed these issues.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Drover's Wife (talk) 22:10, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anthony Magnacca (February 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Doesn't appear to meet WP:NSPORTS or WP:GNG. If you claim otherwise, this content needs to actually make it into the article (and be referenced) - having an draft that consists of a couple of completely random, decontexualised facts about the subject and don't even include a clear claim to notability is going to continue to get declined.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Drover's Wife (talk) 22:16, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Takahiro Saito has been accepted

[edit]
Takahiro Saito, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kees08 (Talk) 23:21, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anthony Magnacca (February 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No real change since the previous decline. This article, like the other one recently declined at AfC, is just of too poor a standard to be accepted.

If you claim that a player with a long history of playing for non-notable clubs makes notability because of some appearance at a notable club, it needs to make that clear: at the most absurd minimum, it needs to name the club, it needs to explain in prose how long their stint with the club was and provide at least some basic context to the claimed notability.

This string of articles with a couple of poorly-sourced random tidbits of information, removed from any context, frequently refusing to even mention the claim to notability in the text of the article, needs to stop. You need to actually put the most bare minimum of work into an article if you would like it to be accepted through the AfC process.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Drover's Wife (talk) 03:17, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Leonce Dodoz Zikahi

[edit]

Hi Das osmnezz, I was in the process of starting the article Leonce Dodoz Zikahi when I noticed that you are already working on a draft of that article. I wanted to let you know that I was thinking of moving the article from the draft space to the article space (or you can do it yourself) as the subject passes WP:NFOOTY and arguably WP:GNG as well. If you would rather keep it in the draft space please let me know soon so I will not move it to the article space. Inter&anthro (talk) 00:01, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Das. I'm fine with this. On a side note you might want start archiving your talk page. See WP:ARCHIVE if you need help. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kekere Moukailou (March 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Kekere Moukailou instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bearcat (talk) 06:00, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keigo Moriyasu (March 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This is yet another in this string of appalling-quality articles: if you claim that he makes notability on the basis of a stint in the Philippines league, you need to mention it in the article. You need to stop arguing with reviewers and actually put some work in on these consistently dreadful articles rather than continually resubmitting with an added few words every time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Drover's Wife (talk) 21:03, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keigo Moriyasu (March 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No substantive change since the previous decline. You need to take the process seriously and cease wasting reviewers' time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Drover's Wife (talk) 02:24, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop It

[edit]
@Ad Orientem:: I moved some of my consistently declined drafts to my userspace where I can edit them.Das osmnezz (talk) 17:31, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:34, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. Remember that you can fix quality issues, like grammar, spelling encyclopedic wording etc. But you can't fix notability. It's either there or it isn't. You might want to consider getting rid of drafts that have no chance of passing WP:N. See WP:G7. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:39, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ad Orientem:: What of the drafts- like Draft:Lee Sterrey and Draft:Anthony Magnacca or Draft:Keigo Moriyasu - clearly meet WP:NFOOTBALL – but are consistently declined? Das osmnezz (talk) 19:26, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If the decline reason(s) do not cite a lack of notability, in other words the draft was declined for one or more reasons related to article quality, then you may continue to work on them. But if they were declined for lack of notability then that is a problem you will likely not be able to overcome. Sometimes one can find added in depth coverage from reliable secondary sources that can help ring the N bell. But usually a decline for want of notability is the end of the story. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:55, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kazuki Yoshino (March 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:23, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kazuki Yoshino (March 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No substantial changes since the submission was last declined. Blog sources are generally not considered reliable.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
• Gene93k (talk) 20:23, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gimmy Bade has been accepted

[edit]
Gimmy Bade, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

• Gene93k (talk) 20:50, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Das_osmnezz/Archive_2&oldid=1063691637"