User talk:Darrin DeYoung

June 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Google Translate, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Border Town ‖ 18:26, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Darrin DeYoung, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Darrin DeYoung! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at IPhone 5C. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: IPhone 5C was changed by Darrin DeYoung (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.970561 on 2017-06-04T14:22:11+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:22, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Roboto, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Roboto was changed by Darrin DeYoung (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.943768 on 2017-06-04T14:24:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:24, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at MacBook Pro. Yashovardhan (talk) 14:40, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:53, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darrin DeYoung (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you have been blocked for, will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead. Darrin DeYoung (talk) 14:56, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:35, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darrin DeYoung (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or the block is no longer necessary because I understand what I have been blocked for, I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and I will make useful contributions instead. Darrin DeYoung (talk) 03:13, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Rephrasing the decline reason isn't going to convince us that your block is no longer necessary to prevent disruption. SQL ^{Query me!} 03:54, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user has repeatedly tried to engage in block evasion after logging out of their account. --Yamla (talk) 15:53, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And has been trying to sock with User:Suck my big balls. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 05:15, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]