User talk:Darkedge3

As it has become apparent that your account will be used solely for unconstructive editing, you have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} to this page. Kuru (talk) 22:35, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darkedge3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You are so narrow-minded. I have NOT used wikipedia for advertising. Athlone Group is a $2.5 billion company, it is not necessary to use wikipedia for advertising, rather it is adding information to the "encyclopedia" for purposes for which it was created. Tesco have a page on wikipedia going into full detail about what they do, and what they sell - this is NOT advertising, it is INFORMATION. Unblock and restore the page that I took time to create if you really believe in "freedom of information"

Decline reason:

No unblock reason given. Argument about wikipedia policies is not appropriate. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 22:47, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darkedge3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

NO reason given ??? Does this not show that I am in fact correct in my argument - I am NOT advertising, merely providing the public with information that I am in fact the copyright holder of. The original desires of the creator of wikipedia were to provide everyone with information on everything available. You are seriously curtailing this goal, and that is why wikipedia is losing its respect.

Decline reason:

Actually, just the opposite; preventing people and organizations from promoting themselves increases the respect for Wikipedia. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 23:02, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darkedge3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This just proves my point of admins being short sighted. This information is NOT about ME - rather I am in control of the information, and providing it to the public.

Decline reason:

You are aware that by posting the information you are releasing it under the GNU Free Documentation License and Creative Commons CC-By-SA 3.0, correct? You are also aware that we will never accept puff-pieces, correct? —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!!)} 23:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darkedge3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

yes

Decline reason:

No. –MuZemike 23:32, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darkedge3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well are you going to unblock it so that I can post the information ? I reiterate that it is NOT advertising - Athlone Group does not require advertising, certainly not on wikipedia!

Decline reason:

Under the conflict of interest guidelines, we all agree not to write about ourselves or our own businesses. Since you do not appear to be interested in writing about any other subject, you do not seem to need an active Wikipedia account at this time. However, if you ever get interested in volunteering to help write the encyclopedia, please feel free to request unblocking- remember to include a clear promise to avoid writing about areas in which you have a close personal connection, like yourself, your business, your web site, your family, or your band. It's only fair to let you know that when a request for unblock has been thoroughly and fairly reviewed by multiple independent admins, talk pages are sometimes locked to further requests to avoid wasting admin time.FisherQueen (talk · contribs)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

:Do not remove declined unblock requests, please. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!!)} 23:41, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Email privileges revoked per legal threats sent to me via it. WP:RTV is only granted to users in good standing, not blocked accounts. If you wish to really vanish, just stop using the account and someone will be by to delete the page after awhile. —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!!)} 00:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Further legal threats, OTRS Ticket #2010010210000288. Consider this account banned indefinitely for WP:NLT until such time the legal threat is rescinded. ⇒SWATJester ^{Son of the Defender} 01:58, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification; the account was previously blocked indefinitely, and cannot have the block lifted until the threat is rescinded. Per WP:BAN, he is considered banned if no admin is willing to unblock (and per WP:NLT, no admin should unblock until the threat is rescinded). Combine with the blatant nature of the offenses, and the multitude of reviewing admins, there is adequate community discussion showing an unwillingness to unblock regardless of the threat. Therefore, he is effectively community banned indefinitely until such time that he rescinds the threat; at which time he will no longer be community banned, merely indefinitely blocked. ⇒SWATJester ^{Son of the Defender} 02:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the legal threat and ban have been rescinded; however please be aware that this account is violating WP:COI by inserting promotional content on behalf of his clients. I would strongly suggest that a community ban be enacted in this case.