User talk:Dannyjonejules

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --J Fred 00:45, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --J Fred 00:51, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked without warning for a while; your vandalism was egregious enough that you did not deserve one. If you continue to vandalize when you return, you will be permanently blocked. --Golbez 00:16, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Continued vandalism of WWE vs. ECW Head to Head

The fact that you continue to vandalise WWE vs. ECW Head to Head indicates you have no desire to change. Be advised that as per Wikipedia policy, this or future vandalism may result in an additional ban or block. Jeff Silvers 06:26, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and for technicality's sake:

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jeff Silvers 06:32, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WrestleMania 22

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. McPhail 15:19, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

That's it. Looking at your comments on the talk page of the wrestlemania, you have no interest in being civil. Goodbye. --Golbez 19:45, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

United 93

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to United 93 (film), are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. qwe 18:18, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I don't give a shit that is vandalism, That movie is a Comedy and it's fucking funny and please, Quit calling it vandalism, cause it's true - Dannyjonejules

- Look one section north and see what happens if you're uncivil again. --Golbez 11:12, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:News Corporation

Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Template:News Corporation. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. FMAFan1990 01:15, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

UPN

The shapes logo for UPN should not be in the infobox because the logo was changed to a slanted circle with a lowercase "upn" in it in 2002. That logo was the logo used at UPN's closure. As such, I have reverted your edits to the UPN article. Thank you for your understanding. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:20, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NFL team logos

Is there some reason why you are changing the logos on the NFL team articles? If I did not know any better, I would say that this is vandalism since you are removing the clubs' current logos. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 22:10, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your change was determined to be unhelpful and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Vic226 19:53, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWE vs. ECW Head to Head

Please do not repost speedily-deleted material. This is considered vandalism and can lead to you being blocked from editing. (aeropagitica) 22:09, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. Because you have continued to vandalize articles and templates like Template:NFL and Super Bowl despite previous warnings and blocks, we have no choice but to block you indefinitely. Regards. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 02:03, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]