User talk:Daniellecart1

Welcome!

Hello, Daniellecart1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 12:54, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Daniellecart1, you are invited to the Co-op!

Hi there! Daniellecart1, you are invited to The Co-op, a gathering place for editors where you can find mentors to help you build and improve Wikipedia. If you're looking for an editor who can help you out, please join us! I JethroBT (I'm a Co-op mentor)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:11, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mentorship

Hey Danielle,

I noticed that you asked to be mentored under "Images and Media" at the Co-op. What would you like to learn? (You can reply here on your talk page)

Cheers, Soni (talk) (Previously TheOriginalSoni) 23:17, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All good- have it sorted. thanks for your reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Edward the Confessor Primary School (April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

Primary schools must have a serious claim to notability to feature here. Does this have one?

If it does,and only if it does, assert it and verify it, and work on the formatting. Deploy {{Infobox school}} instead of the table. Make the pictures thumbnails.

Did you actually take the aerial picture?

You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St Edward the Confessor Primary School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 12:54, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 12:54, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Edward the Confessor Primary School (April 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Worldbruce was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St Edward the Confessor Primary School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Worldbruce (talk) 00:49, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Worldbruce (talk) 00:49, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:St Edward the Confessor Primary School has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:St Edward the Confessor Primary School. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 08:44, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As a catholic organisation the church as an integral part of catholic schools and are used as part of the religious life of the school. This building was also used within the school from 1963- 2010 as a building..until new facilities built as stated. It has been a big part of the school's history.

My view is that the school itself is not notable in Wikipedia terms, but the log cabin church might be. You need to disconnect the importance as part f the school from the concept of notability. The school cannot inherit notability from the church building. Fiddle Faddle 09:12, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you- I have continued to try to explain the building as part of the school history as it was used by the school for many years as a resource and this also enabled this Logan historical icon to be saved. I have also add some more referencing to research projects that the school has been involved in. I appreciate your feedback as it help clarify the points needed to be made. I have resubmitted.

Write in Your Own Words; Do Not Plagiarize

Your addition of text about St Edward to Draft:St Edward the Confessor Primary School has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. The material appears to be substantially taken from: http://www.upsdell.com/StEdwardTheConfessor/saint.htm. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Worldbruce (talk) 16:58, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wondering why

It seems to me to be very unlikely that you will establish notability for Draft:St Edward the Confessor Primary School. This can only be done by providing references that pass WP:42. I will not review the draft again, and I suspect Worldbruce is unlikely to either, so you await another reviewer, but there is a strong probability that their opinion will be similar to ours.

At present you seem to be dusting the mantlepiece and arranging the flowers, both of which make a prettier article, but neither of which establish nor verify notability. I realise that you will not be discouraged, but I hate to see you waste your efforts. To put it as plainly as I am able, only references that pass WP:42 will allow this to be considered as an article. Primary schools almost never make the grade here.

Our role as reviewers is to seek to ensure that an article will not immediately be subject to one of our deletion processes when it is accepted. That is why we push it back to the author. We want to accept articles. There is a 0.9 probability that this one will not be accepted. Fiddle Faddle 10:20, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you as I appreciate all your assistance. I have been working with the Year Five students in the school as when they realised they did not have a presence in Wikipedia they looked to see if it could be established. They did speak to a few other schools over the Term.. eg our neighbour John Paul, St Paul's Woodridge..who were able to get an article published with less references??? Just a little confused as we looked at a few school sites published on Wikipedia?... I would like to try to continue to work with them to find notability and will read the link you provided....maybe it may not occur but will continue to try.

The problem with other articles is that we do not ever use them as precedents. I'm sure you can see why not, since it would lead to ever decreasing quality. We try hard to root out poor articles, even of they have been published some time ago. Notability never wanes, but it may never have been proven in the first place. Once proven it is proven for all time.

There are many excellent schools, and secondary schools seem to get a free ride here, but primary schools must be truly special. Unfair? of course. Do I approve of either set of circumstances? You can bet I do not. Either all schools of whatever grade should be here (I truly think not) or only notable schools should be (Yes, and a thousand times yes), but that is not the case. Fiddle Faddle 11:35, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Edward the Confessor Primary School (May 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joseph2302 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St Edward the Confessor Primary School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Joseph2302 (talk) 22:38, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Daniellecart1, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Joseph2302 (talk) 22:38, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:St Edward the Confessor Primary School concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:St Edward the Confessor Primary School, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:St Edward the Confessor Primary School

Hello, Daniellecart1. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "St Edward the Confessor Primary School".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:00, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]