User talk:Daniel bg

Oral Sex

Please stop deleting these images, and read the talk page, which has lengthy discussion on the topic. You aren't the first person to complain, but Wikipedia is not censored for the protection of children. Unless you get a consensus on the talk page, those images are just going to be reverted right after you remove them.--Prosfilaes 20:20, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Catamorphism 19:21, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia. It will only be reverted, and you will be blocked if you keep doing this. Catamorphism 19:31, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Also, may I suggest that if you are concerned about minors viewing sexually explicit images, you should stop viewing and editing Oral sex yourself, as your user page says you are a minor? Catamorphism 19:53, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your request on my talk page, please see the comments above. You can also nominate the image for deletion at Images for Deletion, but unless it is clearly not appropriate to an article, it won't be deleted. 23skidoo 21:47, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A Link to your user page on your user page

I noticed you had a link to your user page on your user page. That's a bit unusual. If your intent was to put a link to your user page on the Spanish wiki, use [[es:User:Daniel bg]] (assuming your Spanish wiki name is Daniel bg). You might also want to add a babel template, as per Wikipedia:Babel.--Prosfilaes 17:12, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Depeche Mode discography

Hello there. I noticed you created the page Depeche Mode (singles), and I just wanted to inform you that I have moved it to Depeche Mode discography, along with the rest of the band's albums and such. My opinion on the subject is that it makes the most sense to keep all of this information together, rather than having a page specifically for the singles alone (I believe your original reason for creating the page was because the main article was too large). I hope you agree with this decision, but as the creator of the original page, I figured it would be best to let you know of this change. Feel free to let me know how you feel on the subject. Thanks! John5008 --- talk 05:55, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Depeche_Mode_-_Suffer_Well_cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Depeche_Mode_-_Suffer_Well_cover.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags.

I have since taken care of this problem, and appropriately tagged the image in question. John5008 --- talk 22:15, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Complete or delete

This template shows code on the first line:

{{Stable_Isotope| <!-- Here is the template for this nuclide; skip past it to edit the text. -->
isotope_name =     Carbon-12|
alternate_names =  Carbon-12|
mass_number =    12|
symbol =           C|
num_neutrons =     6|
num_protons =      6|
abundance =        98.9%|
mass =             12|
spin =             0+|
excess_energy =    0.000|
error1 =           0.000|
binding_energy =   92161.753|
error2 =           0.014|
}}

Jclerman 02:06, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you get the image? I wouldn't know what kind of image you mean. Why do you need an image? Can't you delete the box that requires an inexistent image? Jclerman 19:04, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

<pre>'d the template code to avoid an accidental transclusion. APerson (talk!) 14:44, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User K-PAXling

This template has been proposed for deletion. The userbox has been moved (including it's history) to userspace per Wikipedia:Userbox migration. You can find it here: {{User:Bisco/Userboxes/K-PAXling}}. If and when the template is deleted you might want to include this code {{[[User:Bisco/Userboxes/K-PAXling]]}} on your userpage instead of the {{[[Template:User K-PAXling]]}} (which would then remain only as redlink without history). --Bisco 13:13, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Traduccion de Telemadrid

Hola como va? Disculpa que no conteste antes, es que ya casi no paso por aca. Parece que el articulo ya lo tradujo alguien mas. Eso es todo, suerte Arg2k 09:16, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Depeche Mode - Suffer Well cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Depeche Mode - Suffer Well cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pedra albumcover.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Pedra albumcover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:09, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articulo Aida (Serie de TV)

He leido este articulo y ponia que era un esbozo, ahora mismo acabo de poner la lista completa de episodios, ya que solo estaba la primera temporada, si te parece bien quito lo del esbozo. --Ravave (talk) 10:38, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Organize userboxes

Please, I would thank to somebody who could organize my userboxes.Daniel bg (talk) 02:10, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Coburn (band)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Coburn (band), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:58, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Coburn (band)

The article Coburn (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nearly even speedy material as there's hardly much here and my searches only found a few expected passing mentions so there's hardly any obvious notability and improvement here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SwisterTwister talk 21:32, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]