User talk:Dalek194

Welcome!

Hello, Dalek194, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Polina Vinogradova, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Gparyani (talk) 15:38, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Polina Vinogradova

The article Polina Vinogradova has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Gparyani (talk) 15:38, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Polina Vinogradova) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Polina Vinogradova, Dalek194!

Wikipedia editor Tomato 33 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nicely written first article! Keep on going :)

To reply, leave a comment on Tomato 33's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Talkback

Hello, Dalek194. You have new messages at Tomato 33's talk page.
Message added 16:17, 27 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Tomato 33 (talk) 16:17, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Good job on the article you created! Cheers! Lixxx235 (talk) 21:15, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the barnstar Lixxx; it's much appreciated :) --Dalek194 (talk) 15:31, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are very welcome. Would you be interested in Adopt a user? Thanks, Lixxx235 (talk) 15:50, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pauline Parmentier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grand slam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Polina Vinogradova

The article Polina Vinogradova has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the notability guidelines for tennis players.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jared Preston (talk) 19:50, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Dalek194. You have new messages at Jared Preston's talk page.
Message added 20:18, 31 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Jared Preston (talk) 20:18, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Polina Vinogradova for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Polina Vinogradova is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polina Vinogradova until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:17, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Samantha Crawford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2012 US Open (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ted Tinling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of the Sexes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Grand Slam girls' singles champions may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|Joan Cross]] || bgcolor="FFF5EE"|{{flagicon|South Africa|1928}} [Joan Cross (tennis)|Joan Cross]] ||

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:01, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anhelina Kalinina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2014 US Open. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, I'm Egghead06. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2014–15 West Ham United F.C. season, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. What you are adding is last season's squad numbers. If you believe them to be current, please add a reliable source. - Thanks. Egghead06 (talk) 17:45, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jodie Taylor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United States women's national football team. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dalek194. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dalek194. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Serena Williams - protected ranking IW 2018

Check out the discussion sites (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:2018_BNP_Paribas_Open_–_Women%27s_Singles) where I've provided links that S. Williams has a PR and stop deleting this information from the site (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/2018_BNP_Paribas_Open_–_Women%27s_Singles)! Mouchatm (talk) 17:05, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve İpek Öz

Hi, I'm Meatsgains. Dalek194, thanks for creating İpek Öz!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing inline citations to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Meatsgains^(talk) 17:02, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Can you please add clear WP:INLINECITED references to Andreea Roșca. It only has 'external links' which means 'suggestions for further reading' and doesn't show what its sources are, which is a particular issue with biographies of living people. Thanks for creating this, Boleyn (talk) 19:58, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm disappointed to see you have created many articles on living people with an empty references section. Many have 'external links' but that just means suggestions for further reading and doesn't indicate what your sources were. It is really important to have WP:INLINECITED references when writing about living people. Please add your sources inline to Miriam Bulgaru, Andreea Roșca and İpek Öz. If you are struggling with referencing, please see Help:Referencing for beginners or ask at the WP:TEAHOUSE. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 12:56, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources and communication

Dalek, can you please respond to my previous messages? WP:Communication is required, per the policies WP:CONDUCT and WP:DISPUTE. Please also see WP:V. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 16:29, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All now moved to draftspace as we can't leave unreferenced biographies of living people in mainspace - however they can be moved back easily when they are ready. Boleyn (talk) 16:39, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Hello, I'm Nzd. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, West Ham United F.C., but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nzd (talk) 16:28, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've been repeatedly warned on this issue, Dalek. Do you understand how to reference? Boleyn (talk) 19:16, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond? WP:Communication is required. Boleyn (talk) 19:22, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate if you could stop harassing me Boleyn. I am not a professional Wikipedia editor and only check back here from time-to-time, and every time that I do I see another hostile message from you.

Regarding the recent tennis pages, since I only created the pages when the players fulfilled the notability criteria, I was therefore hoping to add references as time went on and more information became available (because frankly, for obscure tennis players who've only just become 'notable' there very often isn't very much to reference back to). Regarding the West Ham thing, I incorrectly assumed that the squad numbers used in pre-season games meant that the information was confirmed and would shortly appear on the already-referenced club website, but as it happens, some numbers were changed by the time the season started.

Sorry that I made an honest mistake. But I only edit in passing most of the time to try and correct bad grammar or update outdated information such as WTA ranking which is still dated last year/etc. I suffer from significant levels of anxiety and being hounded on this has certainly put me off doing more significant stuff like creating pages. I do try to reference when I am adding significant new info to pages, but evidently not often enough. --Dalek194 (talk) 10:11, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair, Dalek194 did respond to me about the West Ham edit.

I haven't checked, but I am assuming that you are using the sites you add as external links as sources for your basic articles? Could I suggest that, rather than doing that, you just add those as explicit references (see WP:INLINECITE). They can always be moved down when more substantial references are added. Thanks, Nzd (talk) 10:25, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dalek194. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mésaque Djú

You partially reverted my edits with the following explanation: "West Ham U23s are not a separate club in their own right; they are part of 'West Ham Proper' so to speak".

Mésaque Djú's lead after my edits: "plays for English side West Ham United under-23s in the Professional Development League." As you see, I wrote "side", as in "team", not "club". The source is very specific and states that he will play for the under-23 team. I don't see the problem in writing that he plays for U23. SLBedit (talk) 19:30, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there SLB. I am following standard protocol on the pages of other young players who primarily play in the U23 sides of their respective clubs, but are still contracted professionals and therefore listed as playing for the senior club, even if they are primarily involved with the U23 side. Regards, Dalek194 (talk) 19:33, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Micah Richards, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Transfermarkt is not a reliable source. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:05, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt is one of the only records (Twitter line-ups being another, but that seemed even less likely to be accepted by Wikipedia) that shows the exact position in which players lined-up in matches from previous seasons; I know for a matter of fact that Richards played at CB on significant occasions during his career. A player's position is something that is the majority of the time listed on a player's Wikipedia page without a source; the only reason I added one this time was as a courtesy to prove/back-up my point about adding centre-back to right-back. Dalek194 (talk) 21:58, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emma Kennedy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberal Democrats (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Sadou Diallo article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 19:10, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Players will not actually be released until their contracts end on 30 June 2021

Please do not remove them from squad listings/change their articles until that date. Giant Snowman 19:12, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Luciano D'Auria-Henry article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 16:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]