User talk:DagonAmigaOS

Welcome

Hello, DagonAmigaOS, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! – S. Rich (talk) 12:16, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

IP edits

DagonAmiga, I see that IP 5.55.100.216 has commented on the Ayn Rand talkpage. Since you have created this WP account, you should use this account for editing and talk page comments. Wikipedia restricts the usage of multiple accounts, and using an IP account may be seen as WP:SOCKPUPPETRY. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 18:52, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I was logged-in, I fixed it.--DagonAmigaOS (talk) 19:06, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

– S. Rich (talk) 19:08, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tendentious editing

Please do not edit articles against policy. I'm talking about Ayn Rand. MilesMoney (talk) 14:50, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One edit is not Tendentious editing, putting amateur is not neutral, it is POV, it should be left simple philosopher with no qualifiers which is more neutral than any other option i.e. trained philosopher as it is the case of Ayn Rand or Amateur as you claim.

Neutrality is defined with regard to our sources. Do not repeat your mistake. MilesMoney (talk) 12:52, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neoliberalism wars

I see you've also experienced the wrath of User:C.J. Griffin by trying to edit the neoliberalism article. It seems every article I use as a citation is POV-pushing, but then I found mistakes and clearly biased articles being cited. Also, his perspective seems rather US-biased. Improbable keeler (talk) 17:06, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If i was in the wrong, I believe the results of the RfC DagonAmigaOS started would have turned out differently.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 17:21, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Existence of discretionary sanctions

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Strongjam (talk) 14:25, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]