Jump to content

User talk:DaffodilOcean/Archive1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Paula Bontempi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Paula Bontempi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:48, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Clare Reimers, from its old location at User:HillHouseUSA/Clare Reimers. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055talk - contribs 19:44, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, HillHouseUSA, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Nathan2055talk - contribs 19:45, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

I am not sure which article raised questions about conflict of interest. I have been careful to not write about people where I would be in conflict. Can you let me know how and what was flagged as a conflict so that I might learn what I should to avoid a conflict of interest? Thanks, I am still learning my way around here. HillHouseUSA (talk) 19:52, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

I am tagging this with needing a response from a particular editor as it seems you are asking for a reply from @Nathan2055: who I have now pinged - RichT|C|E-Mail 21:39, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers
added links pointing to David Smith, David Bell, David Clark, Eric Anderson, David Cullen, David Long, Brian McDonald and Eric Chang

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sharon L. Smith has been accepted

Sharon L. Smith, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 13:10, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julia Kubanek has been accepted

Julia Kubanek, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jeromeenriquez (talk) 06:46, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clarice Yentsch has been accepted

Clarice Yentsch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 01:34, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Daily Mail reference at Susan E. Parks

Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at Susan E. Parks. It is not a reliable source. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 08:18, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

My apologies @Robby.is.on: I did not know about the restrictions on the Daily Mail. I have edited the page to reflect that the citations to the Science paper are also appropriate for the statement about sand lance movement due to the whale sounds.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paula Bontempi (June 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ken Tony was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Ken Tony Shall we discuss? 15:21, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, DaffodilOcean! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ken Tony Shall we discuss? 15:21, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Minor formatting

Hi there, don't forget to remove the code for draft categories when moving to mainspace to tidy them up, plus the EL section should always just be named "External links" and be a bulleted point, as per WP:ELCITE. You might also want to include {{Authority control}} just before the categories, as it saves me a job then. :) Keep up the good work though! -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:15, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Kj cheetham - yes! Sorry about that. I will add this to my list. I appreciate your help and the tips to make this easier.
Hi, happy to help! Don't forget to sign posts on talk pages too. :) Hopefully I'm not being too pedantic! Do feel free to give me a shout if can help with anything else though too. Kj cheetham (talk) 13:18, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Ack, that's the second time in two days that I have forgotten to sign a post. I have been communicating with a different editor (Ken Tony) about Paula Bontempi's page that was just declined at AfC, and I forgot to sign those posts as well. So.much.to.learn! DaffodilOcean (talk) 13:24, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
It's easily done, I'm sure I've forgotten more than twice overall! I don't normally get involved with AfC, but always happy to glance at things if ever need a 2nd opinion. -Kj cheetham (talk) 13:53, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paula Bontempi has been accepted

Paula Bontempi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ken Tony Shall we discuss? 13:40, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Autopatroller?

Hi there, I noticed on https://xtools.wmflabs.org/pages/wiki.riteme.site/DaffodilOcean/all#0 you've already made 25 mainspace articles, which is excellent (though that includes a few disamb pages too).

As you may know, most new articles are reviewed by new page patrollers like myself, but people who have shown they are competent at creating pages can apply for auto-patrolled status, which means that wouldn't need manual reviewing and hence reduces the NPP workload. Once you've had 25 regular articles created in mainspace, which I'm sure won't be far in the future, is applying for auto-patrolled status something you'd be interested in? You seem to already be familar with things like WP:BLP, WP:VER, and WP:NOTE (if not, take a look over those when you get the chance if you'd like).

Of course articles will still get looked at at some point as part of classifying as part of wiki projects, etc. too. -Kj cheetham (talk) 08:32, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Kj cheetham - I am happy to apply for WP:AUTOPAT once I meet the milestone of 25 regular articles in the mainspace. This status seems like it would be useful for WP:NPP by keeping your task list to a dull roar. You have been very helpful in providing tips where I have missed things, so if I keep those in mind, I think I would be in good shape DaffodilOcean (talk) 10:16, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
I can't see the admins declining it once you eventually apply. :) Keep up the good work! -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
P.S. I try not to look at the NPP backlog very often!
Kj cheetham Whoa! Overwhelming!DaffodilOcean (talk) 11:35, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Yentsch-Schindler Award for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yentsch-Schindler Award is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yentsch-Schindler Award until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 16:36, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jennifer Logan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Ross.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Done

Category suggestion

Hi there, Just a very minor suggestion - for women scientist bio articles, I'd always try to include a category which includes the word "women", such as "<nationality> women <type of scientist>" ideally, where one exists, or just "women <type of scientist>". Just "Women scientists" itself is too generic though and shouldn't be used. Hope that helps! -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:37, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Kj cheetham I can definitely do that, but I have been avoiding it as it seemed odd. There are no categories for male scientists, just scientists. Hence, why separate out women scientists as a separate group? I say that fully recognizing that I clearly have been focusing on women scientists. However, my goal is to get them on a level playing field where you don't need to specify that they are women.
DaffodilOcean That is a complex answer which I'm not even going to start to get into here as it's been raised in various places elsewhere. I'm coming it at from the angle of the "women scientist" categories exist and hence should be used, especially as a member of WP:WOMENSCI. And if we don't add them to those categories someone else will anyway in due course. I most definitely agree long term should be completely equal, but we're far there yet... and hence there is still some need for extra promotion to even move closer to a roughly level playing field. -Kj cheetham (talk) 14:49, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Kj cheetham OK, fair enough. I will use the categories with "women" in the names, and hope for the day when they can go away. One question, let's use Karen M. Fischer as an example. She's a seismologist, but there is no category for 'women seismologist'. Should I go down the path of starting a new category? Or, use two categories, 'seismologist' and 'women scientists'?
I will also go back and add in the more specific categories as I think I now understand why you had been adding that tag to some of the pages I created. (and I forgot to sign above...sorry) --DaffodilOcean (talk) 18:48, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
DaffodilOcean For that one, is 'women geologist' or 'women geophysicist' a suitable alternative? I don't know the field well enough to say. If not, Wikipedia:Categorization_of_people#Creating_a_new_category has a bit of guidance. Definitely avoid putting individuals in Category:Women_scientists specifically though - would need to fit somewhere in that tree if making a new category. I imagine 'women seismologists' if it was created would fall under Category:Earth scientists? When the time does come to delete a category, bots can automatically sort it all out, so don't have to worry about removing tags from pages manually at least!
If you end up looking more into how categories work more deeply, there's also things like diffusing and non-diffusing categories to be aware of. But if you're not careful you risk ending up with no time to actually write articles, like me. :) Depends how far down the rabbit hole you want to go. -Kj cheetham (talk) 21:05, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Kj cheetham The short answer is - I don't want to go down the category-creating rabbit hole. For the seismologists, I think 'women geologist' works best. As much as possible, I will find suitable alternatives before I start making new categories. Thanks for the ideas and tips. DaffodilOcean (talk) 23:25, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: M. Joan Alexander has been accepted

M. Joan Alexander, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 02:01, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Bette Otto-Bliesner has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bette Otto-Bliesner. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 20:57, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi DaffodilOcean! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 12:35, Thursday, July 1, 2021 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roberta Marinelli (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The sourcing is insufficient to establish WP:GNG notability. Deanship is not inherently notable, so would require more evidence of academic notability. Declining for now, but it's quite a close one.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:07, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi — I ummed and ahhed about this for a while, but in the end had to decline it, for the reasons given above (in that greenish-greyish field in the middle). I've no other major issues with this article, I think it's quite well written, and if you can work on the notability as per my comments, feel free to ping me when you're done and I'll happily take another look so this doesn't have to languish in the review queue for ages. Any questions or comments, let me know. Best, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:12, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
@DoubleGrazing: Thanks for considering this article, I wondered about deanship. Her college at Oregon State does not have named professors (per criteria #5 at WP:PROF). Hence, I hoped that serving as the dean of the department (and her prior position as director of the Wrigley Institute) would suffice. I will see what more I can find to establish notability. DaffodilOcean (talk) 13:51, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Well, perhaps I ought to clarify my review comments: my interpretation is that deanship isn't inherently notable, because it isn't mentioned in the criteria; could be that it is, but just isn't mentioned! I do agree that deanship and the earlier directorship together may add up to the equivalent of a named chair, or at least something pretty close to that, so in that sense this probably isn't far off. If you can find something to bolster the notability claim, I may be able to approve this. If not, then I can ask another AfC reviewer for second opinion, and if they are happy for it to be published then I certainly won't stand in the way. Cheers, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:30, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
@DoubleGrazing: I took the time to find more news coverage of Marinelli's presence as a leader at Oregon State and University of South Carolina. I also added details on her work at the National Academy of Sciences where she has served on multiple committees addressing questions of interest to marine scientists, and I added details about her publications and research. Can you please use this information to consider if her combination of leadership roles is sufficient to merit a Wikipedia page? Thanks. DaffodilOcean (talk) 13:43, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
I think it's still a bit of a leap of faith, but I'll go ahead, apply a bit of WP:WOMRED magic dust (!), and approve it anyway. I reckon there are worse crimes than publishing an article on a clearly distinguished female academic who may not 100% meet the notability criteria. Best, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:13, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
PS: Can you please submit it for review again and let me know? --DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:15, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
@DoubleGrazing: - re-submitted! Thanks for the magic dust. :) DaffodilOcean (talk) 11:05, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi DaffodilOcean, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Chetsford (talk) 06:54, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Chetsford - thanks for granting autopatrolled. I will take a look at the information about the wikiproject talk-page templates. Cheers. DaffodilOcean (talk) 11:12, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clare Reimers (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Wikipedia biographies are built on independent secondary sources with in-depth coverage of the subject. Press releases and the subject's own works don't cut mustard.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Stuartyeates (talk) 19:47, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Judith Grassle (July 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 05:23, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roberta Marinelli has been accepted

Roberta Marinelli, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:10, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Judith Grassle has been accepted

Judith Grassle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 12:42, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Carla Cáceres has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Carla Cáceres. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 06:26, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carla Cáceres has been accepted

Carla Cáceres, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 06:57, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scott Doney has been accepted

Scott Doney, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

―Qwerfjkltalk 10:36, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erin Dolan has been accepted

Erin Dolan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:24, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paola Malanotte Rizzoli has been accepted

Paola Malanotte Rizzoli, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:28, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sonya Dyhrman has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sonya Dyhrman. Thanks! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 01:59, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sonya Dyhrman has been accepted

Sonya Dyhrman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

–Novem Linguae (talk) 10:01, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clare Reimers (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nightenbelle was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Even though she meets notability guidelines- this reads like a CV or publicity piece, not an encyclopedic article. Please remove phrases and words that give subjective value and stick to facts. The text of her awards is irrelevant unless they are unique or in some way surprising / different from what others have received.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nightenbelle (talk) 15:27, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Imke de Pater, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Titan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 30 July 2021 (UTC)


Your submission at Articles for creation: Clare Reimers has been accepted

Clare Reimers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 20:14, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: A. Murat Eren has been accepted

A. Murat Eren, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 09:57, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William H. Twenhofel Medal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Philip Allen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 6 August 2021 (UTC)


"Elena Litchman (Q61767356)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Elena Litchman (Q61767356). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 21#Elena Litchman (Q61767356) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:18, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DaffodilOcean/Archive1&oldid=1190150164"