User talk:Da veder

Welcome!

Hello, Da veder, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! - LuckyLouie (talk) 21:16, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

seclusion of girls at puberty

This article was proposed for deletion as representing an original essay, but as reviewing administrator, I think that although it needs greater diversity of opinion. especially modern opinion, it is not hopeless. Alternatively, turn into an article of Frazier's theory & its modern criticisms,--thetheory is notable enough for an article of its own, whereas the Golen Bough deals with a great many other subjects also. see what you can do with it. Start by reading our guide to writing Wikipedia articles. DGG ( talk ) 01:26, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

A Comment

Hi, DGG thank you for your comments and appreciating the fact that it is a worthy topic. At the outset itself,I tried to make it an impartial note on this topic. As there are other wikipedia docs on The Golden Bough and Sir Frazer I didn't try to work on Frazer's overall view on Magic and Religion. To make it less essay like (the likeness, if any, to an essay was unintentional),and to add wiki references, I re-edited the text. With regard to merging this with 'puberty'; I believe the article on puberty, a physiological account on puberty, should be the last place for the current article on puberty rites. Given the number of pages Frazer, leaving others aside, spent on this alone, I think the topic is important enough to have its own encyclopedic entry. Thanks again and hope to hear from you soon. D v 11:29, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Da veder/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Da veder/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:38, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Da veder! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 10:38, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: User:Da veder/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Da veder/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:39, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zoltan Troey has been accepted

Zoltan Troey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 03:32, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Zoltan Torey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zoltan Torey, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoltan Torey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 19 July 2023 (UTC)