User talk:DaRealToonChance

December 2022

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Debi Derryberry, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 16:13, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Boulder Media, you may be blocked from editing. Waxworker (talk) 15:50, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I emailed them to help me with a show and pitched it to nick via email it doesn't have to be sourced DaRealToonChance (talk) 15:58, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HarringToons Productions moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, HarringToons Productions, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:10, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nickelodeon Preschool Group moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nickelodeon Preschool Group, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 19:12, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nickelodeon Dance 2 moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Nickelodeon Dance 2. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:49, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nickelodeon Dance 2 (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nickelodeon Dance 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:22, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DaRealToonChance! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 10:22, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Papaya Studio, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 11:45, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DaRealToonChance, I know that you are enthusiastic to add Wikipedia but please note that we generally only include information if it is cited to secondary reliable sources (like news websites). Even if some information is true, including it would constitute original research. (Also, we have no way of knowing that "papayastudio.com" was even their website in the first place.) eviolite (talk) 03:15, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Dora the Explorer, you may be blocked from editing. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 00:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't wanna hear no "unsourced stuff" because the 3 new dora projects were announced in 2022 DaRealToonChance (talk) 00:47, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't provide a source so it is unsourced. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 01:35, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Boat Rocker Media, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 14:31, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just put a source DaRealToonChance (talk) 14:32, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at PBS Kids Go!. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 15:19, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to The Hive (TV series), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 01:05, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Disney Junior. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 16:52, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mini Wolf moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mini Wolf, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:35, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Nick Jr co-productions

Template:Nick Jr co-productions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Drmies (talk) 00:46, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, you've been pretty disruptive so far (your edits on Draft:Mini Wolf being a clear example), but removing the AfD notice on Template:Nick Jr co-productions, that is the kind of thing that can get you blocked. Just stop, please. Drmies (talk) 01:08, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said those are work in progress and sources will be added soon but right now they are NOT finished at the moment so I’m not being disruptive I’m giving a clear point DaRealToonChance (talk) 01:11, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, you are being disruptive. You can NOT remove a deletion template, and Mini Wolf, if it is a work in progress, should have STARTED as a draft, or been done in your sandbox. You do not, I believe, understand how all this works, and you should probably listen to those who do--there's a few of them on this very talk page, including User:Waxworker, User:Spiderone, User:Mccapra, User:SunDawn, User:KylieTastic, User:Eviolite, User:Xexerss, and User:Blaze Wolf. Drmies (talk) 01:17, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly believe you should be blocked at this point. Me and many others have told you your edits have been disruptive and yet you claim I'm not being disruptive I'm giving a clear point which to me seems to indicate that you simply do not care what we say and you are therefore not here to build an encyclopedia. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 01:50, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At the same time I give sources to stuff that is “unsourced” at this point I don’t even care just block me cause y’all are just annoying DaRealToonChance (talk) 01:51, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While some information you did give sources to, they weren't properly done or not a WP:RS or WP:OR for some of the PBS kids edits. "According to a friend of mine Caillou aired from 2005-2009" told you doesn't count. Plus when I reverted your edits you told me it was on pbs website and when I looked it wasn't and even going back on web archive. Edits are clearly not constructive. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 02:19, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Improper citing in an article

When you added new content from a new sourced, as you did in this edit, please include the source in the article text with {codett|<ref>}} tags, following Help:References. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 08:02, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Citing sources

You are required to cite sources in the article, not an edit summary. Additionally, please make sure that every addition of information in cited. If you fail to cite sources in the future, you may be blocked from editing. Thanks, QuicoleJR (talk) 15:40, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What article? DaRealToonChance (talk) 16:02, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Any article you add information to. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:18, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Idk how to cite sources like jeez DaRealToonChance (talk) 20:27, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Read Help:Citing sources. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:36, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Your recent editing history at Wolfoo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 21:01, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Verifiability is a core Wikipedia policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Aoidh (talk) 21:04, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - In addition to the edit warring going on at Wolfoo, editors have been variously asking and warning you to provide reliable sources for the content that you add to articles since December 2022. Despite months of requests to do so, you have not, and this response does not inspire confidence that you intend to try to do so. Rather than blocking you indefinitely, you have blocked for 72 hours which is plenty of time to read Help:Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup/1 as well as Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Please take the time to do so, and when your unblock expires, heed the advice that others have given you and use reliable sources when adding content. If the persistent addition of unsourced content continues after this block expires, it is likely that you will be blocked indefinitely. - Aoidh (talk) 21:06, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Again you are adding unverified information to articles and, in the case of Template:Nick Jr., removing something without a valid reason. You just came off a block for such editing; the next block will be longer. Drmies (talk) 18:55, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn’t a disruptive edit Moose and Zee never had a show so shorts nor segments of them shouldn’t count DaRealToonChance (talk) 19:01, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. I don't think you can be trusted to realize how disruptive your edits are, which is why you were blocked--and you're still doing it. I will say this one more time: you removed that link from "2000s debuts", and apparently these two debuted in the 2000s. It doesn't say "2000s shorts" or "2000s shows" or whatever. If you want to argue differently, do that on the talk page. Drmies (talk) 20:13, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh but why does it say 2009-2012 and not 2003-2012? DaRealToonChance (talk) 20:17, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't even know what you're talking about, and I don't really care about a matter that doesn't really concern me. Drmies (talk) 00:10, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disney co-productions

Disney is not credited for shows like Ella the Elephant and Katie and Mim-Mim. Luigitehplumber (talk) 21:06, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They aren’t credited for Ella but they are involved in production (http://www.stevenhenry.net/blog/2014/12/16/ella-the-elegant-tv-star) DaRealToonChance (talk) 13:11, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs are not usable as sources in Wikipedia. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:13, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh but does it still count as a co-production because they were involved DaRealToonChance (talk) 13:20, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you can find a reliable source stating that they were involved, you can count it. If you have questions, check WP:RS. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:22, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Found one (https://kidscreen.com/2012/02/07/cookie-jar-acquires-rights-for-new-series/) DaRealToonChance (talk) 14:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This just says it aired on Disney Junior, not that Disney helped produce it. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:36, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It says Disney deal in the title tho DaRealToonChance (talk) 14:38, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read it? It only says that Ella made it to Disney Junior. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:42, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did read it but the title said “Cookie Jar’s Ella lands FremantleMedia, Disney deals” DaRealToonChance (talk) 19:38, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Disney deal refers to getting it on Disney Junior. QuicoleJR (talk) 19:51, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of programs broadcast by the Nick Jr. Channel, you may be blocked from editing. You have previously been warned and blocked due to unsourced content additions, and also appear to be continuing with the same/similar problems on the 'Disney Channel co-productions' template. I would strongly advise you stop with all of this, as you are just increasing your chances of receiving a longer block than previously. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magitroopa (talk • contribs) 05:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It’s not poorly source as there was many missing Nick Jr shows on the list original’s and co-productions so they needed to be added so it does not need to be sourced DaRealToonChance (talk) 16:39, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And once again, you continue to ignore what you've already been warned many times about. It's clear that you either can't or don't understand what you are doing is wrong at this point. Magitroopa (talk) 16:45, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Please see the discussion at WP:ANI#User edit warring & unsourced edits. Magitroopa (talk) 16:26, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Aoidh (talk) 16:44, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:HarringToons Productions

Hello, DaRealToonChance. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:HarringToons Productions, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:10, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nickelodeon Preschool Group

Hello, DaRealToonChance. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nickelodeon Preschool Group, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:HarringToons Productions

Hello, DaRealToonChance. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "HarringToons Productions".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nickelodeon Preschool Group

Hello, DaRealToonChance. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nickelodeon Preschool Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:27, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Nickelodeon Preschool Group produced shows

Hello, DaRealToonChance. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Nickelodeon Preschool Group produced shows, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mini Wolf

Hello, DaRealToonChance. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mini Wolf, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mini Wolf

Hello, DaRealToonChance. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mini Wolf".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:08, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ernest & Rebecca

Hello, DaRealToonChance. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ernest & Rebecca, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Ernest & Rebecca

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Ernest & Rebecca, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:16, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nickelodeon Dance 2

Hello, DaRealToonChance. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nickelodeon Dance 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:08, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]