User talk:DTurik

Welcome

Hi, DTurik. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like it here and decide to stick around. If you see something on Wikipedia that you want to change, just press the edit button and change it!

For the basic principles, see the five pillars of Wikipedia. And if you're ready to make some edits, this Wikipedia cheatsheet may come in handy.

Cheers, ChzzBot IV (talk) 00:33, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mikaela Turik. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's a video tutorial - hit play, then right-click for "full screen".

Here's an example of how to add references:

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea.<ref> Smith, John. "[http://foonews.com/Article42 Interview with Chzz]", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22. </ref>

== References ==

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers^[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at #wikipedia-en-help ^connect.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 00:33, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mikaela Turik, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sionk (talk) 13:18, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

Glad you're happy and welcome to Wikipedia!

Looking at your article and thinking of your user name; I suggest you read the 'conflict of interest' WP:COI page and put a disclosure or disclaimer on the article talk page.

Ariconte (talk) 04:21, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your constructive feed-back. I am a "newbie" but am also struggling a bit with organising links, attaching digital pics and understanding the programming requirements. Rest assured, that I have endeavoured to be as neutral as possible in writing the content by simply piecing together currently available, reliable, unbiased, third party information with as many references as possible. I certainly welcome any feed-back and assistance! DTurik (talk) 04:43, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Internal vs. external links

Welcome to WP. Just thought I'd let you know that if you want to link to another article in Wikipedia you can just type [[Article name]], and don't have to use an external link (one square bracket) that points to wiki.riteme.site. For further reading on the subject, have a look at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking. Good luck with Mikaela Turik! –meiskam (talk•contrib•block) 03:54, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, that was a big help and much appreciated! DTurik (talk) 21:47, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DTurik! Drop by the Teahouse anytime!

Hello! DTurik, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 06:00, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sarah, thank you very much for your kind assistance and introduction to the Tea Room, an excellent resource thanks!

Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 15:21, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Message sent with Global message delivery.

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mikaela Turik, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DTurik/sandbox (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:DTurik/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AmaryllisGardener ^talk 14:23, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rankersbo was:

No additional sources have been added since the article was last declined.

You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:DTurik/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rankersbo (talk) 08:02, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:DTurik/sandbox

Hello, DTurik. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:DTurik/sandbox}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 09:24, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]