Jump to content

User talk:DMacks/Archive 37

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 30Archive 35Archive 36Archive 37Archive 38Archive 39Archive 40

19:28, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

HEMA boiling point

Hi, DMacks, This is wangwei0824, nice to meet you. I am a researcher that have worked with HEMA monomer for more than 3 years. In the standard pressure, the boiling point for pure HEMA monomer is 67 C. It my first time in Wiki edit, and I am not sure what is called a reliable source and how to add it. Maybe this link works:

https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/aldrich/128635?lang=en&region=US

If you think this is fine, please add it. I just want to provide the right info for readers.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wangwei0824 (talkcontribs) 01:46, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

@Wangwei0824: the Aldrich catalog is a good ref. It does say 67 °C, but it says that value is at 3.5 mmHg. Using their own nomograph, 67 °C at 3.5 mmHg is 212.6 °C at 760 mmHg. That agrees with the 213 °C value, which is cited to Evonik. Do you have a source for 67 °C being specifically at standard presure? DMacks (talk) 01:51, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

This Month in Education: March 2018

Wikipedia Education globe
Wikipedia Education globe
This Month in Education

Volume 7 | Issue 3 | March 2018

This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!

In This Issue


Featured Topic

Education Programs Itinerary

From the Community

Animated science educational videos in Basque for secondary school student

Beirut WikiClub: Wikijourney that has enriched our experiences

Students of the Faculty of Biology in Belgrade edit Wikipedia for the first time

The role of Wikipedia in education - Examples from the Wiki Education Foundation

Multilingual resource for Open education projects

Wikipedia: examples of curricular integration in Portugal

From the Education Team

Resources and Tips to engage with Educators

Education Session at WMCON 2018

Page protection

Hi DMacks, can you protect the WWE Raw Tag Team Championship page? Thanks. -KH-1 (talk) 04:11, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Semi'ed 1 week. Let me know if any other admin action is needed (blocks or fullprot at some known "good version" if there are non-new editors involved in vandalism, etc.). Thanks for working on this mess! DMacks (talk) 04:16, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Does WWE SmackDown Tag Team Championship also need semi? DMacks (talk) 04:17, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Yeah, and probably WWE Universal Championship as well. -KH-1 (talk) 04:22, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Semi'ed each 1 week. DMacks (talk) 04:25, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

18:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Article Discussion Of Kerala

Hi, I am trying to make this article a standard one by removing information that is misleading the topic. There are unwanted images on the page. There is a Necessity as the citizen of the state itself to remove irrelavant information of such "advertisements" and adding some info on the Required Contents like:

  • Removing the gallery of Fauna with only required images of Endangered Species.[1]
  • Adding Agriculture Information On Major Crops.[2]

The Present article is more fact than distant truth. Have a Good Day!! Stalin Sunny Talk2Me 05:46, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

References

Hi Stalin, we are all just editors here, so it's great that you want to improve an article about your location, but you do not get any special privleges as a result. Your concept of "standard" sounds pretty far from what Wikipedia has set as its standards--for example, we try not to make heavy use of images, especially for article-navigation purposes. Or, at least your concept of "advertisements" is not quite on-target, and you have nothing beyond personal opinions of what is "unwanted". Adding content about crops and endangered species is good, but we are not trying to solely present the "official" information (what the government says)--an encyclopedia is not a tourism brochure. Look in the article's history, back to February 2016, and you will see how it looked when it earned a "Good Article" stamp. You will see there are not many image-galleries and the ones that are there add encyclopedia-content value. DMacks (talk) 14:02, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Snooker

Note before your future action, unseeded players are not relevant to seeding section. 46.211.125.190 (talk) 12:26, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

I am acting solely on inappropriate edit behavior, not taking a position on what content you all decide, through WP:CIVIL discussion to reach WP:CONSENSUS, is best. DMacks (talk) 01:57, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
@Thomas Kirk Larsen: adjacent to where you found to post on my userpage is a box that says I'm an administrator and has a "verify" link for your convenience. All I see is inappropriate edit-warring over a legitimate disagreement about content, not WP:VANDALSIM. DMacks (talk) 02:00, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

15:20, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

18:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

208.184.165.151

It seems that they're going to keep posting junk to their talk page, already rv'ed one personal attack directed at you already. Would it be appropriate to revoke the IP's talk page access? RA0808 talkcontribs 17:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

I think you have the wrong IP pasted here?
hasn't posted to any talkpage and nobody has posted to its talkpage. DMacks (talk) 19:17, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Ahah, it was
Talkpage access revoked. Thanks for all your work on cleanup! DMacks (talk) 19:21, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Oh geez, sorry for the confusion. I must have had the wrong tab open when I copied. Either way glad it got dealt with! RA0808 talkcontribs 01:17, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into your local language via meta
The 2017 Cure Award
In 2017 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 02:45, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

16:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

This Month in Education: April 2018

Wikipedia Education globe
Wikipedia Education globe
This Month in Education

Volume 7 | Issue 4 | April 2018

This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!

In This Issue


Featured Topic

Wikimedia at the Open Educational Resources Conference 2018

From the Community

Global perspectives from Western Norway

Togh's WikiClub: Wikipedia is the 8th wonder of the world!

Aboriginal Volunteers in Taiwan Shared Experience about Incubating Minority Language Wikipedia in Education Magazine

Workshops with Wiki Clubs members in the Republic of Macedonia

Celebrating Book's Day in the University of the Basque Country: is Wikipedia the largest Basque language book?

Txikipedia is born and you'll love it

Students Write Wiktionary

From the Education Team


Presenting the Wikipedia Education Program at the Open Education Global Conference

16:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

You are being a mentor`

Mentor
Sir you are being a mentor can you describe a little bit how to add links to Wikipedia and why you didn't approve mine, Rohitme78 (talk) 16:36, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
The main use of links is to support new text that is added to an article rather than just added in a loose list of links (see WP:EL guideline). A link used as a reference needs to be a reliable source (see WP:RS guideline). That is, the goal is to assist with the verifiability policy for article content. DMacks (talk) 19:37, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

your revert of my change to "Robotic Process Automation" page

Hello,

Please explain why do you think my addition of "Kryon" to the list of RPA vendors is not legit. Kryon (AKA "Kryon systems") is a very known RPA vendor, and also appears in the list of RPA vendors in reference #6 in the "Robotic Process Automation" page (Forrester Waiver): https://www.forrester.com/report/The+Forrester+Wave+Robotic+Process+Automation+Q1+2017/-/E-RES131182 (in the Forrester article it appears as "Kryon Systems".)

If you agree, please re-add "Kryon" to the list. if not, please let me know why, and what proves can I provide you to convince you "Kryon" should be on that list

Regards,

Oren. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orenk9 (talkcontribs) 19:47, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

The link you added was to an article that says:
Lee Carroll is an American channeller, speaker and author. Carroll has authored thirteen books on channellings from an entity he calls "Kryon", and has co-authored three books on what he terms indigo children, a new generation of children he says represents an evolution in human consciousness.
And as I said on your talkpage:
organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline.
That is, without an actual article on the topic of this company, WP:CONSENSUS seems to be that it should not be listed. Instead write the article first and see if others think the topic is notable (see WP:CORP for guidelines on what that means in this context). DMacks (talk) 19:55, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

22:23, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Comment about edits

In my revision of Blackboard Bold, I wrote "Very standard symbol for" instead of "represents" because the letters N, Z, Q, R, C are completely standard in mathematics usage, and can only mean one thing. The other usages are occasional or optional. I think this is a useful distinction.

Other than that, I shortened the phrasing in several places. Magyar25 (talk) 20:04, 19 May 2018 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Magyar25 (talkcontribs) 20:01, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

A standard is a standard--an absolute idea--no need to be more wordy unless there is any weakening (contradictory or non-adopted standard): I dispute that "very" adds anything. So I think "Very standard symbol for" is wordier and not really more meaningful than "Represents". I could go with "Standard symbol for" (omitting "very"). None of the three pieces you changed look shorter (two even look longer). And the one you did shorten became less clear (it's not just that Hamilton discovered quaternions, but that the H actually represents his name. DMacks (talk) 03:03, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

17:34, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

12:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Hii

I would like to create this article on this Company Named Novotech Australia Pty Limited (https://novotech-cro.com/). I request administrator's permission to write this article. I also request protection of this article from getting vandalized or tagged for speedy deletion.Veilplot (talk) 10:42, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

No. DMacks (talk) 13:57, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi, D! Seems many administrators are enjoying the summer weather. Almost all the noticeboards are dead. I've got the above at both RPP and another editor has it at ANEW. An IP is repeatedly inserting a 12,000 bit addition to the article that is pretty much completely unacceptable, and while posting at the talk page, saying nothing constructive. Since this guy just died in the last month, this is a pretty visable article. Could you please semi it for a week? Thanks. John from Idegon (talk) 14:16, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

 Done. I'm taking a mostly-unplugged day or three but stil obviously am failing to do it completely. DMacks (talk) 19:36, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. Enjoy your holiday. John from Idegon (talk) 20:00, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Why ? No ?

Am I a criminal to not create. Answer me. Veilplot (talk) 13:12, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Honestly, Veilplot, if you have no better command of written English than the above sentence indicates, you have no business editing here at all. You should probably try to contribute to your native language Wikipedia. John from Idegon (talk) 13:55, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

English is not a skill, it is a language. Check my last edit on Novotech Australia Pty Limited. Gone are the days, when English is considered a skill. It is just a business language. I will pull the wool over your eyes. You are not my manager in office, to use professional language with you. If I use professional language in my articles, that is enough for you.Veilplot (talk) 14:13, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

This Month in Education: May 2018

Wikipedia Education globe
Wikipedia Education globe
This Month in Education

Volume 4 | Issue 5 | May 2018

This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!


In This Issue
From the Community

Creating and reusing OERs for a Wikiversity science journalism course from Brazil

Inauguration Ceremony of Sri Jayewardenepura University Wiki Club

Wiki Education publishes evaluation of Fellows pilot

The first students of Russia with diplomas of Wikimedia and Petrozavodsk State University

Selet WikiSchool

From the Education Team

A lofty vision for the Education Team

UNESCO Mobile Learning Week 2018, Digital Skills for Life and Work

21:54, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shalom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beth Shalom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

21:55, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Pyramidal inversion

Hi about your edit comments on nitrogen inversion, I could just convert pyramidal inversion, currently a redirect, into the general case. What do you think? --Smokefoot (talk) 14:48, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Sounds like a good approach. DMacks (talk) 14:49, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

21:47, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

MVM Inc inaccuracies.

Please see the below statement from MVM Inc. The company is not affiliated with Trump "zero tolerance" aka "Trump administration family separation policy" as has been posted on social media or other media websites. Please do not disseminate false information on the public wiki page.


Since 2014, MVM has been working in support of the Department of Homeland Security to transport unaccompanied children to Department of Health and Human Services designated shelter facilities. This is a critical step in a complex immigration process and we take great pride in the work we do on this program, and in the professionalism of our dedicated employees.

MVM also has a second contract with the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR). In 2017, prior to the current “zero-tolerance” policy, MVM was one of several organizations awarded a contract to provide as-needed emergency support services to ORR. Under this program MVM is required to maintain readiness in the event ORR requests services from MVM. To date, we have not provided emergency services under this contract.

Unfortunately, in the wake of the Administration’s implementation of a “zero tolerance” policy in which undocumented parents and children are being separated, inaccurate reports have surfaced via media outlets and social media regarding the services MVM provides.

To be clear: the work that is doing today is the same work we were doing prior to this policy change and we have not pursued any new contracts associated with undocumented families and children since the implementation of the current policy.

Blureeg85 (talk) 23:49, 20 June 2018 (UTC)


— Preceding unsigned comment added by Blureeg85 (talkcontribs) 23:30, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

That's nice. But I actually don't care what they say they do (or don't do), what they actually do, how they try to obfuscate or clarify, or what image they try to portray. On wikipedia, it's all about reliable sources, which means what others (indepdenent publications) say. At best, an article could also include what a company itself says (carefully explained as being their own words, not taken as certain truth), with a proper bibliographic citation. Take it to the article talkpage, where you and others can have a discussion, as usual for dispute resolution. DMacks (talk) 02:34, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Response

Hi DMacks I have no personal connection to the institution rather I am an independent researcher. Thank you! MattVoorhees15 (talk) 15:26, 21 June 2018 (UTC) MattVoorhees15

Hello can we add this image it is free of use

this one Besteditor (talk) 07:28, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

I'm confused...what "we" is this? DMacks (talk) 13:41, 24 June 2018 (UTC)