User talk:DJV11181988

Welcome, roadfan!

Hello, DJV11181988, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

If you are interested, there is already a community of users who are roadfans or who edit articles about roads, just like you! Stop by any of these WikiProjects—WP:HWY (worldwide), WP:AURD (Australia), WP:CARD (Canada), WP:HKRD (Hong Kong), WP:INRD (India), WP:UKRD (United Kingdom), or WP:USRD (United States)—and contribute. If your interest is in roads in the United States, there is an excellent new user's guide. There is a wealth of information and resources for creating a great article. If you have questions about any of these WikiProjects, you can ask on each project's talk page, or you can ask me!

If you like communicating through IRC, feel free to ask questions at #wikipedia-en-roads ^connect as well. Here, there are several editors who are willing to answer your questions. For more information, see WP:HWY/IRC.

Again, welcome! Imzadi 1979 → 03:59, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DJV11181988, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi DJV11181988! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bypassing redirects

I noticed that you spent a lot of time bypassing the redirects on New York State Route 28. This is normally a worthless activity, but in some cases, you could be breaking the article in the future.

Take, for example, the change from "County Route 2 (Delaware County, New York)" to "List of county routes in Delaware County, New York#2". If that specific county route is split back out into a separate article, this article will not link to it. If an article about the General Location of National System of Interstate Highways were to be written, and this is a good possibility, by bypassing the redirect to "Interstate Highway System#History" means this article will point to the wrong place. You should read WP:NOTBROKEN. Imzadi 1979 → 00:28, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You many not like it, but bypassing redirects like that causes issues. Now, you've been reverted twice on one article, and once on another, both FAs. I'm formally invoking WP:BRD here: you were Bold, but you've been Reverted, now it's time to Discuss. Imzadi 1979 → 17:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"It's because I want these pages to redirect without saying 'Redirect from...' below the title" is not a valid reason to make those edits. For the third time, I call on you to read WP:NOTBROKEN and to engage in discussion, not reversion. Continuing to avoid collaborative discussion here on your talk page could gain the attention of administrators willing to block you from editing to force you to engage in discussion. If you can't collaborate with others, you don't belong on a crowd-sourced website like this. Imzadi 1979 → 22:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of video game consoles (sixth generation) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:47, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of video game consoles (seventh generation) may have broken the syntax by modifying 14 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:01, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alabama

WTF is the point of edits like this? --NE2 01:47, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Viacom Media Networks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Epix. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of New York state parks may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[Shaver Pond Nature Center]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:04, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Your recent edit at CBS Television Distribution has been reverted. Trivialist and I had a discussion recently about unsourced library lists on television studio articles. We can see if they had references next to them, but they STAY gone until you provide a tremendous amount of references so the list can survive. If not, leave it alone, and have a nice day. King Shadeed 19:29, November 14, 2014 (UTC)

Recent edits

Hello. Are these edits really necessary? The links that were linked prior to your edits goes to the same website. To me it makes no since at all to add the extra ".../home" or whatever it says after the main www.---.com.

Notable people

Hello. Please do not add staff members to news station articles unless they are notable. In the words of another user:

“

Lists of people must meet the criteria listed at WP:LISTPEOPLE. Articles have been protected to prevent these additions and/or the editors in question blocked when they persistently continue to reinsert inappropriate material. If a name is included in the article in this way, it has to show that it's relevant to the subject by meeting WP:LISTPEOPLE. Just because a station lists its employees doesn't mean Wikipedia needs to as well, and other station articles needing similar cleanup doesn't mean this one doesn't need to be cleaned up, because whenever it's actually discussed on a station article, the end result is the same; the names that don't meet WP:LISTPEOPLE are removed. Wikipedia is also not a directory. See here, here, and here for previous discussions about this.

”

In other words -- Don't add names that do not have an article! Also, it was unsourced. Adding unsourced content is not allowed, so please let this be your general warning. Corkythehornetfan | Chat? 00:58, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hello, I'm Amaury. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jessie (TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Amaury (talk) 00:29, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Time Warner Cable

added a link pointing to Time Warner Cable Sports Channel

Time Warner Cable News

added a link pointing to Time Warner Cable Sports Channel

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Corky | Chat? 01:15, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chinatown, Manhattan

I know people may want to learn how to speak the names in Chinese, but for non-native Chinese speakers, if they don't know the language, they're hardly going to care about how to say these characters. If they speak Chinese, like me, they don't need the aid of pinyin anyway. Epic Genius (talk) 03:08, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Same deal with Koreatown, Long Island. The romanization is not important here. Epic Genius (talk) 03:13, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don't add higher-level categories for existing categories

See explanation at WP:SUPERCAT. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:20, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dumbo's Circus. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:09, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm Callmemirela. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Lab Rats episodes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 22:59, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited WDRB, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WHAS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of state routes in New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NY 2. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ESPN Inc., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WEPN. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Images don't appear

Lately, the images on Wikipedia don't load. When I close the browser and reopen it, the images would load.

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Destiny USA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ruby Tuesday. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asda

Sources please? --John (talk) 19:18, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm David Biddulph. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Asda, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - You were removing sourced data and replacing it by unsourced. We don't change an article until we have a new published source. --David Biddulph (talk) 03:19, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Asda. - You also need to read WP:BURDEN. --David Biddulph (talk) 15:51, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

--John (talk) 20:19, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Since the List of state routes in NY was reverted, you can help continue editing here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:List_of_state_routes_in_New_York Cards84664 (talk) 12:18, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: NY Route stuff

Hey, there is now a draft being worked on by Cards that was decided at Talk:List of State Routes in New York. Easier to work there. Mitch32^{(I can have oodles of charm when I want to.)} 01:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Walmart may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{nbsp}}billion}} in 2006, which equated to {{US$|957}} per person or {{US$|2,500}} per household (up 7.3 percent from the 2004 savings estimate of {{US$|2,329}}.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:41, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Walmart may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{nbsp}}billion}} in 2006, which equated to {{US$|957}} per person or {{US$|2,500}} per household (up 7.3 percent from the 2004 savings estimate of {{US$|2,329}}.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.
(401 locations), Sam's Club (12 locations), Neighborhood Market (2 locations), Smart Choice (1 location, and Trust-Mart Hypermarket (19 locations) banners.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://corporate.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 31 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Sam's Club page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TV Templates

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have reverted your edits on the Philadelphia, New York and Los Angeles TV templates. The way you layout the TV stations make it way too cluttered because you put all of the stations in one section and makes it look very un-organized. For example, you decided to bunch up all of the stations for New York City and de-categorize them. Not very accessible for easy look-up. And for the Delaware Valley TV stations, you bunched every station up. Please leave the old layouts as they are. Thank you for your consideration. --Skeeball93 (talk) 18:21, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have to echo this, and adding cities of license to the templates is completely unneeded. Please keep them organized. Nate • (chatter) 09:34, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Walmart

Hello, DJV -- I noticed your edits to Walmart, including this one and the one following it. The first one was made while a Guild of Copy Editors notice was posted asking editors as a courtesy to refrain from editing until the notice is removed as a major copy-edit was underway. We came very close to having an edit conflict while I was in the middle of re-arranging several sections in the article. The second one followed so closely upon my edit removing the notice that it almost looks as if you hadn't noticed the GOCE notice. In the future, try to notice whether there is a "GOCE in use" template notice at the beginning of the article. Thanks. – Corinne (talk) 00:38, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In use

(talk page stalker). Hi, DJV11181988. For your convenience, here is what the in-use template looks like when it is running:

Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 03:36, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Walmart does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You have been apprised of this before. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 03:31, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. --John (talk) 20:59, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

--John (talk) 23:40, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kmart may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{Infobox company

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:05, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, DJV11181988. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Walmart, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 03:43, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DJV11181988 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Could you unblock me now because I don't want to wait?

Decline reason:

No. You have to convince us you would never again add unsourced content. Yamla (talk) 16:37, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DJV11181988 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'll convince you that I will not add unsourced content. Unblock me now.

Decline reason:

No. Convince us first. And bear in mind that further similar behavior will result in a longer block. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:40, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Edit warring and edit summaries

Hi again DJV11181988. I continue to be concerned over your editing pattern. Please give these questions and requests serious consideration.

1) Are you affiliated with Walmart? WP:COI is the link to read on this one.

2) Could you please use edit-summaries? Help:Edit summary may be of use here

3) Please don't edit-war: it harms collaboration and will lead to a block if I see you continuing. WP:EDITWAR is the policy link.

4) Discuss your edits in article talk; in looking through your contributions this is something I do not see and I need to see it.

I will continue to look at your edits. If I see no improvement I will block you again. This will be for a week next time. Please take the time to read these links, and change your editing behaviour in accordance with our community norms. Thank you. --John (talk) 16:26, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries, as requested above. You know how to do it as you did it here. If you don't explain what you are doing, why should others let your edits stand? Then you get into edit warring, which you have been warned for before. Please also discuss edits in talk, as previously requested. Please reply here to this request indicating that you understand what I am asking. Please do not just ignore this and carry on editing without edit summaries or discussion. --John (talk) 16:27, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Domino's Pizza. Mlpearc (open channel) 15:17, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

As I mentioned, you need to show sources, leave informative edit summaries for all edits and use discussion pages. This block is for a week. Your next one will be indefinite. Let me know if there is anything you don't understand. --John (talk) 11:35, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

--John (talk) 17:32, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DJV11181988 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Could you please unblock me now because I want to be able to update the number of Walmart locations on their article every month. DJV11181988 (talk) 23:26, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Huon (talk) 23:37, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DJV11181988 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me because I will make useful contributions. DJV11181988 (talk) 23:40, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQL ^{Query me!} 23:45, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DJV11181988 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me because it is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption. DJV11181988 (talk) 00:40, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I suggest you read WP:GAB - your unblock requests are unpersuasive. PhilKnight (talk) 01:05, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Editing the lead and infoboxes

Hello,

As I have stated regarding the addition of information to the lead, per the Manual of Style requirements listed in WP:Lead:

the lead should not contain information that is not found in the body of the article.
the lead provides a summary of information found in the article.
the lead should not be cited as it is a summary of the article, citations should be placed in the body.

also from the MoS requirements found in WP:Infoboxes

an info box provides a summary of information found in the article.

The reason I keep reverting your changes is because the information you have added to the lead isn't contained elsewhere in the article. In some cases, the changes you made would be grounds for a review of Good Article status. The same goes for the infoboxes, they are summaries that do not need every fact and figure about the company - only quick facts that are explained in detail in the article.

Also, the reason I keep removing the specific number of stores is because it is constantly changing. E.G. Yes, Burger King states that it had 15,003 stores in its 2015 10-K statement; however that was as of December 31, 2015. Since then the company has released two 8-K forms which state different numbers. Stores have closed, stores have opened and that number is no longer accurate. That is why I changed it to 15,000+; that number gives the reader a good idea of the size of the company's operations and will not become outdated as quickly.

Please stop insisting that articles must have the information because of your personal opinion and provide a valid, policy based reason why these changes are proper. I've given you my reasons why I reverted your changes, its your turn to stop edit warring and provide a reason why they should stay. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 17:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DJV11181988 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to be unblocked because I didn't make disruptive edits.

Decline reason:

It looks like you were blocked for the exact same behaviour as before. Editors have tried at length the discuss this with you. If you don't respond to the community explaining their expectations regarding the content of the lead and the precision of numbers then you leave little option but to block you. HighInBC ^{Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}}} 23:54, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DJV11181988 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me now because it is wrong and I did not do anything wrong.

Decline reason:

WP:NOTGETTINGIT. Talk page access revoked. Yamla (talk) 00:14, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

DJV11181988 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16051 was submitted on Jun 28, 2016 23:15:30. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 23:15, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Walmart does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 08:07, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Katie^talk 13:24, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Template:Nickelodeon original series and Nicktoons ‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Namely, introducing deliberate factual errors. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 03:21, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, DJV11181988. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 7 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of assets owned by Walmart page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NY 191

Hey, the NY 191 comment about longest decommissioned route is OR, and really trivial at best. I've removed it again. Mitch32^{(Every man is a new method.)} 20:08, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Time Warner Cable, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 23:55, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TVQ template

Why do you edit to remove use of the TVQ template, replacing it with much more complicated and harder-to-maintain explicit URLs with unhelpful display text? How does this improve Wikipedia for the reader? Jeh (talk) 01:52, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed; all of these edits have been reverted; we have templates for a reason, so if something changes in the FCC coding, it takes only ONE change. The new links are unhelpful and completely confusing to the layman. Nate • (chatter) 03:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Best Friends Whenever. Amaury (talk | contribs) 20:08, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TV templates

Don't add audio information to station article channel maps. It's usually unsourceable and just adds extraneous noise to the article. Any further additions to television templates without a minimum discussion on WP:TVS will be reverted without comment. Nate • (chatter) 03:25, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Best Friends Whenever

If you haven't already, you need to read this discussion on that article's talk page at Talk:Best Friends Whenever#About show's "apparent" cancellation (and possibly contribute to the discussion) regarding what sources have come out about the cancellation of the show, and why we are not accepting them ... and are in need of reliable ones that clearly indicate that Disney Channel has officially cancelled the show. You have been given enough warning already about why we are not accepting the edits you have made at Best Friends Whenever, List of programs broadcast by Disney Channel, List of Disney Channel series, and Template:Disney Channel Original Series, yet you continue to restore these edits in the foregoing articles without giving any feedback to the editors who have reverted you. It may be true the show has been cancelled, and the indications from the sources that have been brought forth by you or other editors point toward that, but none of these sources are clearly speaking on behalf of Disney Channel. Even the M Magazine source currently used in the Best Friends Whenever article is sketchy based on their leaning toward gossip - we need solid proof from an official Disney representative/executive or a source unequivocally reporting on their behalf to indicate the series' cancellation. MPFitz1968 (talk) 19:58, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TVQ removals

This is your last warning on this; don't remove the TVQ template from television station articles, like you did [1] here. You have an issue with TVQ, bring it up on the talk page at Template talk:TVQ. Don't throw in links that'll throw off the reader and other editors. Nate • (chatter) 16:45, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You did it again; I've reported you to ANI. Enough is enough; we have talk pages for a reason; to discuss large changes to pages. Discuss, and use them. Nate • (chatter) 01:35, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, your refusal to properly discuss your edits with other users, and for your disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

DJV11181988 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "DJV11181988". The reason given for DJV11181988's block is: "Persistent addition of unsourced content; after years of warnings; block durat

Blocking administrator: Coffee (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: This isn't an autoblock; you've been blocked directly. Yamla (talk) 16:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DJV11181988 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me because the web address "statons.fcc.gov" redirects to "https://publicfiles.fcc.gov", and I want to edit that station profile template, and add links for it on the external links sections of the TV station articles.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 17:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DJV11181988 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's no longer necessary because I will not continue to cause damage or disripution. I want to be unblocked now.

Decline reason:

This block is set for six months. In the light of your ongoing behaviour, and your block history, I see no reason to unblock you. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, DJV11181988. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

San Diego Radio

Welcome to WikiProject Radio! Because most HD Radio channels are usually linked to a radio network, and the network's slogans are not relevant to the overall station itself, I have reverted your edits on the five iHeart San Diego radio stations. You should also note that most stations use RDS systems, which also carry slogans. The slogans stated on their official webpage, which may match the RDS readings is to act as the official primary slogan. However, On-air statements may differ, which are secondary and tertiary slogans. Exact On-Air readings, which may be longer (essentially a mission statement), do not necessarily apply. And as a San Diego native, I am ensuring that the slogans match that of the RDS, If not the official webpage.

Furthermore, you need to use the edit summaries, located just above the Publish Changes button, so that future editors and administrators can see what exactly happened.

Please DO NOT restore your edits, HD slogans are usually linked to networks, and should only be linked to articles on those networks. However, If you want to create an article on the Breeze network, You may do so.

Thank you, ~~AirTSC~~{talk}

Radio station URLs

I strongly suggest you discuss this issue at Talk:WGAR-FM#Station website rather than trying to unilaterally force through your preferred version. This will not get resolved through edit summaries. Levdr1lp / talk 01:49, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to WIXT (AM) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Levdr1lp / talk 00:57, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

San Diego TV

Hi, Thanks for your contributions.

I have noticed when you edited the infobox for KNSD, you added KCST-TV calls, the suffix actually was added in 1980, per the REC California TV database, I have cited the database in the article for reference. I use the REC database to monitor for callsign changes, callsign history, and repeaters. Also: I have previously contacted you regarding our radio stations in San Diego, but now for TV stations, for callsign history, please be sure you use a database that records callsign history for accuracy before placing it into an infobox.

Again, as a resident of San Diego, I monitor Radio and TV stations in the area for accuracy. In addition, I also know about some of the top rated radio stations in Los Angeles.

To Acknowledge this message, Reply by clicking edit next to the section title, go underneath this text (including the sigs), and begin the reply with an asterisk, and if there is anything you still don't get about radio or TV, please message me on my talk page.

Thank you for understanding, ~~AirTSC~~{talk} 07:00 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Classic Hits (Westwood One), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Live and Let Die (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:45, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Summary

Hi, I noticed on your edits on Wyndham Hotels and Resorts you have been doing a great job on your edits ~ I don't know if you have been to your Preferences page~ just click on preferences at the top right of your user page ~ then go to editing and select 'Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary', I find this helpful to remind me of leaving a summary ~ thanks for your edits ~ regards ~ Mitchellhobbs (talk) 18:29, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Citing sources

Hey, Nice to meet you again ~ I noticed your edits on Applebee's and IHOP, up dating the number of locations ~ on those edits I noticed you just added an url ~ I went ahead and cleaned up your "url" to keep a consistency in that article and hopefully to keep the link rot away ~ in the future you can use this as a guide for sourcing ~ ^[1] Thank you ~mitch~ (talk) 21:05, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ {{cite web}}: Empty citation (help)

Sears

Please stop editing the article to report on the individual Sears store closure at the Cross County Shopping Center in Yonkers, New York. As I explained in reverting your edit (twice), the article Sears is about the national retailer. Wikipedia is not a newspaper. The closure of individual store locations does not belong in the article. That's why you don't see every store among the 500 or so closed in 2018, much less those closed prior to last year, listed in the article. The only mention of specific stores refers to the closure of the last Sears store in several states. It appears that that event with regard to the state of New York is not occuring now and may not occur for some time. General Ization ^Talk 18:52, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese titles

Please do not convert the English portion of Japanese titles to Katakana. We are representing the game title as it is used in Japan, not reverse-translating it back to japanese. If they print English on the cover of a game, we write that English as it appears. You've done this multiple times now. -- ferret (talk) 18:26, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies filmography (1950–59), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lucky Me (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:42, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of largest cities of U.S. states and territories by population, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barre, Vermont (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Hello, I'm Contributor321. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bard College, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Contributor321 (talk) 18:36, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Vassar College, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Contributor321 (talk) 19:47, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on East Durham, New York. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Contributor321 (talk) 19:54, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited St. Lawrence County, New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franklin County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Schneider's Bakery. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:23, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates

When you add coordinates to the infobox of an article that already has a {{coord}} template elsewhere in the article (as at KJMS), please remember to delete the existing coord template. If an article contains more than one {{coord}} coded for title display, the article gets thrown into the maintenance category Category:Pages with malformed coordinate tags. Deor (talk) 04:24, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Bellevue Square, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sounder Bruce 01:11, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of shopping malls in the United States, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Horton Plaza, El Cerrito Plaza and Broadway Plaza.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Disney Fam Jam, you may be blocked from editing. MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:55, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury • 18:57, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Amaury • 19:25, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cite error

I've noticed you have persistently been adding back the same format for references on Macy's: <ref name = "storecount"><ref>...</ref>. Please note that the correct format is <ref name = "storecount">...</ref>. For more info, please see the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Sungodtemple (talk) 12:46, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: WNYB

When did WNYB move its license to Buffalo? There's nothing on the FCC files, and the transmitter is staying put. Also, doesn't this leave Jamestown without a TV station? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:18, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Got an explanation from the AVS Forum: "They didn't, it's a glitch in the LMS database when it comes to handling stations that file for a Digital Replacement Translator under the same license. Their main RF 5 signal is still licensed for Jamestown, but their RF 27 translator, if approved, will be licensed for Buffalo." Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:31, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of radio stations owned by iHeartMedia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KTZR.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of NPR stations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KZNC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of NPR stations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belle Haven, Virginia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

templates

Hi. I just wanted to chat for a second about a couple of edits you made/reversions I made, so as you won't think I'm just trying to pick on you or give you a hard time.

In regards to edits you made on both the Buffalo and Pittsburgh TV templates (that I have since reverted), it needs to be pointed out that even though some stations are piggy-backing on other's spectrums for their physical channel, their virtual channels - which is what people go by and what the stations promote themselves as - remain the same, and thus that is what we go by on the template.

Since the templates go by virtual channel, that is the only one that matters. So in Pittsburgh for instance, WPNT is piggybacking off of WTAE and WPGH for their ATSC 1.0 physical channel/subchannels...OK. Virtually though, they still come up/redirect as channel 22.1, 22.2, etc., which is what people know it as, and the number they use on their clicker to watch it. Truthfully, most probably don't even know (or care about) the technical geeky stuff about how physical channels work and spectrums and so forth.

Same goes for WNYO in Buffalo...piggybacking physical channels off others, but virtually still coming up as 49.1, 49.2, etc.

So as far as the templates go, physical channels and spectrums are irrelevant, as at the end of the day, it's the virtual one that matters.

Thank you.

Vjmlhds (talk) 23:15, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa! I see you've done the same thing to the templates in Seattle, Salt Lake, Tampa, and Columbus (and probably more I haven't gotten too/seen yet). It doesn't matter if every station in town uses the physical channel/spectrum of just one, as long as they have different virtual channels (and call letters), that's how we list them in the templates. Vjmlhds (talk) 23:31, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Add Portland, Detroit, and Raleigh-Durham to the list as well. Can't be doing that. As long as virtual channel so-and-so still exists with it's own call letters, that how it gets listed in the template. Physical channels and spectrums don't matter, and as I said before no one except the hardcore techno geeks really even really care when you get right down to it. Vjmlhds (talk) 20:02, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Add Vegas, Denver, Sacramento, Phoenix. That's 13 cities that had to get undone. Once again, physical channels and spectrums are absolutely irrelevant as far as the templates go...we go by virtual channels, as that's how they appear on people's TVs. Gunking things with the techno geek stuff just confuses people. So please refrain from doing that in the future. Vjmlhds (talk) 22:23, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And with Nashville and OKC now taken care of, that makes 15 templates that needed to be fixed. I think I got them all. Don't do that again. Vjmlhds (talk) 14:40, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Palisades Center

Hi. Please do not add uncited material to articles, as you did with this edit to Palisades Center. The sources cited for the two passages in question do not say what you indicated in your edits, and after having accumulated over 13,000 edits here since 2014, I'm guessing that you're probably aware that this violates Wikipedia policy. If you want to change that information, please do so only if you can accompany it with citations of sources of greater reliability or of more recent publication. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 20:01, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do not revert the article again. You not reverted your policy violations, you removed the other edits I made, including the addition of a new source, the addition of templates, etc.

If you believe that your edits are not policy violations, then please discuss it with me, and we'll see it if we can come to some type of agreement. Otherwise, if you revert it again, I will contact an administrator and have you blocked. Nightscream (talk) 20:15, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kmart

You have been here long enough to know how WP:BRD works, and what WP:OR and WP:SYNTHESIS are. You made an edit, I undid it and explained on the talk page. It's up to you to get consensus for your edits. Unsourced claims such as yours have been a problem for quite a while on this article. I pinged you to the talk page, so you can't even claim that you didn't know this was an issue. Unless you have reliable sources that explicitly say how many stores there are and in which states, you cannot make these claims. Meters (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I Know this was not directed to me, but this is relevant: If you didn't delete what I SOURCED and put on the Talk page, you would have been able to see (IN A SOURCED FORMAT) exactly which stores are left in which jurisdictions.

173.241.182.119 (talk) 06:15, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WHAMNewestLogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WHAMNewestLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Coop & Cami Ask the World episodes, you may be blocked from editing. You have a long history of adding unsourced material and other disruptive behavior. Drmies (talk) 00:23, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kmart. Please read WP:OR and WP:SYNTH Meters (talk) 19:41, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of school districts in Vermont, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newbury, Vermont.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:5fea00d192103f0ea7774922.png

Thanks for uploading File:5fea00d192103f0ea7774922.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:WQEN-HD3 logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:WQEN-HD3 logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:WMJJ-HD2 logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:WMJJ-HD2 logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:WDXB-HD2 logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:WDXB-HD2 logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Advise

If you plan on making a big change to an article around here, please make sure that you gain consensus first by Wikipedia editors before proceeding to make a change. Your edits on WFOR-TV and WTVJ did not come with the consensus from the editors at large. -- PanchamBro (talk • contributions) 02:14, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:5ecc72c427d5e36b22bafb8c.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:5ecc72c427d5e36b22bafb8c.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:5fea00d192103f0ea7774922.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:5fea00d192103f0ea7774922.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Current WAAX logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Current WAAX logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WBHP logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WBHP logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:10, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WDXB-HD2 logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WDXB-HD2 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:12, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WMJJ-HD2 logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WMJJ-HD2 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:15, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WQEN-HD3 logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WQEN-HD3 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:19, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kmart. How many times do we have to tell you this? Someone's YouTube video is not a reliable source, and even if it were a reliable source, we would not change the number of stores now simply because a source says that a store will be closing in the future. Meters (talk) 00:38, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palisades Center

Please do not blank large amounts of content, along with their supportive citations, without explanation or discussion, as you did with this edit to Palisades Center. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 16:06, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Round-robin page moves

Next time two stations swap call signs (like WOYS and WOCY), just get in touch with me. I have pagemover permissions that let me swap the pages directly instead of doing more complicated hacks and can clean up from there. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 21:40, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited WITR, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Can't Stop.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Transformco, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Meters (talk) 20:21, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sears. Meters (talk) 20:32, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Enough. How many times do I have to warn you for not sourcing these claims about how many stores are left? Meters (talk) 20:33, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have had multiple previous blocks for this. I suggest you read WP:IDHT and WP:CIR Meters (talk) 20:36, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"KMMA (AM)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect KMMA (AM) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 24#KMMA (AM) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:50, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, KDNL-TV, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 19:06, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

KFOR-TV table

Some time ago, I removed all of the {{hidden}} templates for translator lists in articles because that template straight up says in its documentation, Generally, collapsible templates should not be used in articles. We've also been moving away from tables with excessive technical information on individual translators to this list format. This actually came up at the GAN of another TV station page. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 22:03, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you did not notice the second sentence. We've been moving to that format and away from tables—even outside of hidden tags! for all sorts of reasons. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 22:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your recent edits

PTEN was not a network, but rather a syndication service from Warner Bros. Television. I reverted your edits, even though they were in good faith. If you need help, just ask my good friend @Sammi Brie:. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 02:16, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited KUTV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newcastle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Master control" in lead paragraphs

The reason I have been reverting these additions is because they simply are not important enough for that position in the article, and arguably they are crufty. At the top of an article, that is too much detail. See MOS:OPEN.

It's 2022. Most TV stations have off-site or hubbed master control now. We don't need to include that as a fact. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:27, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on KSTU. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 19:17, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:DJV11181988 reported by User:Sammi Brie (Result: ). Thank you. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 21:44, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

KSL-TV

added a link pointing to Pine Valley, Utah

KTVX

added a link pointing to Pine Valley, Utah

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Meijer. GA-RT-22 (talk) 19:37, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also I see you have a history of COI and edit war warnings. Do you have a COI with respect to Meijer? When I reverted you there, the polite thing to do would have been to discuss your proposed edit on the talk page instead of simply re-applying it. GA-RT-22 (talk) 19:49, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm FlightTime. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, KVBC-LP, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:38, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated failures to address other editors' complaints about your editing, particularly the failure to use proper sources, or sources to begin with, and general incompetence.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Daniel Case (talk) 21:00, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Whamrochesterdt2.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Whamrochesterdt2.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:09, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Whuf 2019 tv.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Whuf 2019 tv.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:50, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] {{cite web}}: Empty citation (help)

[1]