User talk:DH39

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Johnbannan, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

MrOllie (talk) 13:47, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a baseless accusation. I am not a sock puppet. Please end this investigation immediately. DH39 (talk) 13:51, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not Johnbannan’s sock puppet. What is this some kind of joke? DH39 (talk) 13:53, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Me Pleaee

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DH39 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was falsely accused of being a sock puppet. No proof was given. Mr.Ollie apparently is in a rage and hates Physics Essays. Bizzare behavior. DH39 (talk) 14:20, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Requests that contain personal attacks are not considered. 331dot (talk) 15:06, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

Except there was evidence of sockpuppetry as can be seen at the SPI here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Johnbannan and the sockpuppetry was checkuser confirmed with technical evidence as well, so... Lavalizard101 (talk) 14:46, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am a different human being in the same household using the same internet provider. I am not a sock puppet. DH39 (talk) 14:57, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mr.Ollie hates superdeterminism and calls it fringe despite the proof I cited by physicist, Dr. Hansson appearing the reliable source, Physics Essays. DH39 (talk) 14:59, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mr.Ollie is clearly personally biased against superdeterminism and should be blocked from editing. DH39 (talk) 15:01, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a sock puppet. Please undo these block of me. DH39 (talk) 15:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MEAT may be relevant then, —Paleo Neonate – 13:45, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock DH39 please!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DH39 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for being a sock puppet. I am not a sock puppet of Johnbannan. I use the same internet provider, because I live in the same house. I did nothing wrong, but to an interest in superdeterminism thanks to my friend.

What’s wrong with citing an article appearing in Physics Essays by physicist, Dr. Johan Hansson? DH39 (talk) 15:21, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not buying this. MER-C 16:51, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.