Jump to content

User talk:DCB4W

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, DCB4W, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for registering with us. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  NickelShoe 17:16, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you for all your work in creating a synopsis on the V for Vendetta page.

Much appreciated.

--P-Chan 08:30, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Bendinger

[edit]

I forgot to italicize the titles and I didn't know Stick it had a page, because at the time I created the article, it didn't. Thanks for your help though. --Kc12286

Welcome to the Military history WikiProject!

[edit]

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

  • Starting some new articles? Our article structure guidelines outline some things to include.
  • Interested in working on a more complete article? The military history peer review and collaboration departments would welcome your help!
  • Interested in a particular area of military history? We have a number of task forces that focus on specific nations or periods.
  • Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every military history article in Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill Lokshin 14:43, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AHBL / Brian Bruns

[edit]

Hi DCB4W. I made some edits and comments on these two articles and some articles related to it. Can you look at Bruns behavior, I don't think it is proper that he removed cited information, edits his article, and makes accusations revealing personal identities. And can you take a look at my edits to made sure they are ok or if I did anything wrong. --Chakabuh 01:28, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


"De"'s da Thing

[edit]

I understand where your coming from in omitting the possessive/attributive "de." I.e. the example given of Lafayette and Tocqueville. But keep in mind that both Lafayette and Tocqueville are as much "theirs" as "ours," and so it's permissible that "we" drop the "de," also there might be an element of yankee egalitarianism in the stylistics of referring to them sans the "de." Nevertheless, in the case of Gilles de Rais, Dominique de Villepin, Brian de Palma, or Oscar de la Joya, the article is never omitted. 'See how De Villepin is referred to by the BBC [[1]] or in the NYT [[2]] (articles selected at random). I also understand how it can be confusing seeing De Sade referred to as Sade tout court half the time, but then again more than half the links to him are to Sadomasochist sites, can't expect them to know any better. Also I must admit the Encyclopedia Britannica online refers to the Baron as simply Rais, but then again Britannica 'tis but children's toy. George Bernard Shaw in his introduction to his play Joan of Arc refers to De Rais et al. as well " De Rais, La Hire and the rest" [[3]] . A good rule of thumb is: it's licit to omit the article when dealing with French, Italian, Spanish, etc..., writers, but usually not in the case of the subject of someone elses's writing. Google scholar gives the following examples of "De Rais" & "De Sade":

E LEYTON - Criminology - ucs.mun.ca ... Century: the French Baron Gilles de Rais, one of the wealthiest men in. ... of these cases and it is not clear, for example, if de Rais' confession -. ...

F Ferguson - Representations, 1991 - JSTOR ... partners. De Sade makes his heroes uniquely self-centred

K Acker - The Review of Contemporary Fiction, 1999 - questia.com ... written and subsequently became literary history," "the black tradition," "the tradition of political writing as opposed to propaganda" (de Sade would head ...

Google scholar gives 0 examples of "Rais" or even "Sade." It seems that De Rais is simply de rigeur.

Marsiliano

Ah, but you oppose the "de" on the grounds that it is illogical, since according to you it simply means "the," and thus to say "the de Rais" (a contorted and improbable phrase to begin with) would be redundant, so the same would need apply to the Spanish and the Italian, but of course it doesn't. You have to understand that we're dealing with what's customary, it is NOT customary in academic papers to refer to "Sade" tout court but rather to "de Sade," however it IS de riguer to speak of "Cervantes" and hence it would be seen as bizarre, if not outright wrong, to say "de Cervantes" or "de Cervantes Saavedra." De Rais, as you point out, should (I think for aesthetic reasons) be written "de Rais" when not begining a sentence. Google scholar, George Bernard Shaw, the example of "de Sade," provide ample enough precedence and justification for having "D/de Rais" be the house style.

P.S. It's irrelevant to look at French articles, were not dealing with issues of "French on French" so to say, but of "French on English." Hence my EXCLUSIVE focus on English articles. Marsiliano etc, etc

A faux pas, I admit. The supposed redundancy would be in the case "of de Rais." Custom demands that we write "Cervantes" and not "de Cervantes," likewise "de Sade" and not "Sade," following this pattern and Shaw's good example and sound style it is best to refer to the Baron as "de Rais." I never suggested French names should be translated into English (although I believe this is the practice in the case of certain Anglo-French kings, e.g. Richard Coeur de Leon), I simply stated that one should look to scholars and authors writing in English for examples and precedents, even in the case of foreign names: obvious example Livy versus Livius. I frankly don't care about the onomastic permutations of Lafayette, it is best to follow the custom of the land and the time. In the case of the Marquis de Lafayette there can be little controversy, he signed his name "Lafayette" [[4]], it has become the norm in America, to do otherwise, as you seemingly suggest, is to court ridicule. Your limited understanding of French onomastics is not surprising, considering its relative complexity vis-a-vis the extreme simplicity of the American naming system (a result of Ellis Island?). Not only have you not demonstrated that my method is wrong (at most you've made an either/or case), but you clearly fail to sense that Rais tout court can be grating to the sensibilities of other, non-American, anglophones. "Fayette" is balanced by the qualifying "La," "Tocqueville" has a consonantal evenness, but "Rais" is left utterly denuded without its attendant "de." Polyglotism makes the tin ear golden. Take heed young man, do like your colonial fathers and learn French.

Marsilianus

After careful inspection I've determined the "de Rais" article requires major revision. If this farrago of run on sentences is not quickly corrected Wikipedia is again liable to attract the derision of the New Yorker [[5]]. À bientôt. Marsiliano

Question from a sockpuppet

[edit]

Pray tell why isn't de Gaulle called Gaulle by you Americans tout court? --72.195.145.248 03:16, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gaulle isn't a place name and the de isn't a particle. Read the Charles de Gaulle article. DCB4W 03:42, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And Chrétien de Troyes? No–sane–person calls him simply Troyes (You can't possibly argue otherwise). --72.195.145.248 08:57, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, sane people know that he's called "Chrétien de Troyes" because his name was Chrétien and he was from Troyes, and that "[de] Troyes" was neither actually his surname nor part of his title. Nobody knows what his surname was, and even the part about being from Troyes is something of an educated guess. Admit it, this is an elaborate joke, right? You're not serious, surely? DCB4W 00:40, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue IX - November 2006

[edit]

The November 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Battle of Ghazni

[edit]

Hi There,

Just created this article, Battle of Ghazni during the First Anglo-Afghan War. I was wondering if you could fix up anything which is incorrect or add to this battle or link this battle to other articles so that it generates traffic. Thankyou. Mercenary2k 02:55, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - December 2006

[edit]

The December 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:30, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - January 2007

[edit]

The January 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 20:27, 23 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

WP:MILHIST Coordinator Elections

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 11!

Delivered by grafikbot 10:22, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military History elections

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by February 25!

Delivered by grafikbot 13:51, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of Style - my retirement

[edit]

Hi there - I just thought I'd pop by and let you know that I'm about done "fighting the good fight" to have some sort of sensible policy being adopted that acknowledges that flexibility should exist on Wikipedia while simultaneously encouraging great writing and limited fancruft.

I tried, I failed, what more can really be said?

I've noted that my draft proposal is now marked as a historical relic, and I've left comments on the talk page. Good luck with your efforts. I'm sure you may see me sporadically posting, fixing up fictional pages that on subjects I enjoy and more often on the science pages that got me into Wikipedia in the first place.

Best of luck! Dr Aaron 13:33, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I spoke too soon - I cracked and tried to have one more go. I've decided rather than fighting all my battles at once, to give up on the "in-universe perspective" argument, and just try to make the page just a little bit better by adding some Key Principles - i.e. make it not just about the perspective.
I've tried to advertise it a bit on the Village Pump so more than the usual suspects will turn up.
I welcome your input. My hope is to get a consensus to get at least this small concession for a change to the existing guidelines. If I can't even get that, then I will give up again.
Dr Aaron 12:33, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - February 2007

[edit]

The February 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 14:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Thank you for your comment at Wikipedia talk:Attribution#Role of truth

[edit]

Thanks for your supportive comment. This point has been raised a few times in the discussion, by at least one other person besides me, and in my opinion has not been addressed; the discussions veered off into the logically different point of whether apparently true but unsourced material should be included. I feel it needs more thorough discussion and better treatment in the FAQ as well as the wording change I propose. I really appreciate your reply -- I was feeling ignored for a while there!

You may also be interested in my comments on the covered bridge example in Wikipedia talk:Attribution/FAQ#Major rewrite of not truth section. --Coppertwig 19:57, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WAF change

[edit]

I like it! -- Ned Scott 06:07, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Re discussion at Wikipedia talk:Attribution

[edit]

You might (or might not) be interested that I've quoted one of your edits at Wikipedia talk:Attribution#It doesn't look to me as if there was a consensus. in relation to discussion at Wikipedia talk:Attribution#Role of truth. --Coppertwig 00:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007

[edit]

The March 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 18:47, 30 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Hey There

[edit]

I had another go at a compromise on the succession box thing. I can go into explanations with you later. My wife is calling me right now.--Dr who1975 01:34, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Columbia University

[edit]

Greetings, fellow Columbian. I just created a WikiProject dedicated to Columbia University, the schools, environs, and the notable people who notably affiliated with it. If you want to be part of it, please check out WP:Columbia. It is very barebones right now, but with your help we can expand it and make it fully functional. --Valley2city₪‽ 07:24, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIV (April 2007)

[edit]

The April 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 13:45, 6 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

David Hockney

[edit]

I noticed that you created the temporary non copy-vio version for David Hockney as a sub page of the article talk page. Nice bit of detective work tracking that down. Just FYI, I've reinstated it now and deleted the sub page. Cheers. --Cactus.man ✍ 06:58, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XV (May 2007)

[edit]

The May 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:38, 9 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007)

[edit]

The June 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 13:36, 8 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator selection

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by August 14! Kirill 02:53, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators from a pool of fourteen candidates to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by August 28! Kirill 01:00, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:All-America City

[edit]

I seem to recall something odd about that. It was taken from the category of articles that had the listify tag and were suppose to be OK to listify and delete. I think someone pointed out that some items were tagged without having a discussion. So if this was the case, it would be a deletion that was out of process. A list was created so nothing has been lost. The list includes more data then is available in the category. Since it was out of process, if my guess here is right, then it could be recreated. However if nominated I suspect that the result would be to listify. Hope this helps, but it was a long time ago. Vegaswikian 02:42, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bridget Cleary

[edit]

Hi. Could you please go to the Bridget Cleary article & discussion page, and see what you think about the "murdered" vs. "killed" distinction? THX... Z Wylld 19:45, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XVIII (August 2007)

[edit]

The August 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XIX (September 2007)

[edit]

The September 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:16, 8 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XX (October 2007)

[edit]

The October 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 13:46, 3 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)

[edit]

The November 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 01:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2nd AFD for New Lettrist International

[edit]

FYI - You previously participated in an AFD on New Lettrist International; it has been renominated a second time (AFD. --Lquilter (talk) 08:43, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007)

[edit]

The December 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:48, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! TomStar81 (Talk) 02:40, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)

[edit]

The January 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:32, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

[edit]

The February 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates. Please vote here by February 28! --Eurocopter tigre (talk) 11:33, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)

[edit]

The February 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:19, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)

[edit]

The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)

[edit]

The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:33, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)

[edit]

The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:21, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)

[edit]

The June 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:21, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)

[edit]

The July 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:56, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:53, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)

[edit]

The August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:49, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

[edit]

The September 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please vote here by September 30!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:39, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)

[edit]

The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:17, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)

[edit]

The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:41, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Historical basis for King Arthur

[edit]

I've reverted this because Goodrich is a dreadful source. I'm off for the day shortly, but I would be happy to give you chapter and verse about this tomorrow if you would like to discuss it. Thanks. dougweller (talk) 06:33, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Doug. I noticed your revert and noticed the reference was used for the statement "Archaeological studies show that during Arthur's alleged lifetime, the Anglo-Saxon expansions do seem to have been halted for a whole generation.". I think i've read things like this in more than a few books, though. Can you quote something that says this just isn't the case - that the statement just isn't true?--Celtus (talk) 06:59, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I changed it back because I do have a source supporting that claim. I think we need to reach a consensus that the source isn't reliable before dismissing it though; it was published as a nonfiction book by a normal publisher, not a vanity press. Goodrich might be as unerliable as Holy Blood, Holy Grail, but I don't know that, and I think that's a claim that would need to be proven. I started a thread on the article's talk page to discuss that. DCB4W (talk) 15:42, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Game System License

[edit]

"I highly doubt that the *winner* would have to pay the attorneys' fees of the *loser*. Is there a source for that interpretation of the agreement?"

GSL section 11.4 "Licensee will be responsible for all legal costs, including Wizards’ attorneys’ fees, associated with any action required by Wizards to enforce the terms of this License."

Does the GSL itself count? shadzar-talk 04:56, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The thing is when you sign the SOA for the GSL you explicitly give WotC the right to ask for any help with court cases, including any fees they request no matter what. So if WotC wins or loses, they can still uphold that section of the GSL where you agreed to pay any costs they request as signing the statement of acceptance. So by using the GSL you give up some rights as per described in the GSL and must abide by it. It would be for the courts to decide if this contract and license in binding, but as for what the GSL states, yes, WotC can have anyone pay its court/attorney fees. Also you cannot take WotC to court as per the GSL, so if WotC takes someone using the GSL to court, adn the court does not rule the GSL as non-binding, or the clause above as dismissed, then WotC can lose the case and require, under the GSL, for the winner to pay WotC fees. That is one of the things that are controversial for some about the GSL. But an expert in legal matter might be needed to work it out outside of FAQs and such that have been written detailing the GSL, that are not "reliable secondary sources" to satisfy wikipedia guidelines for inclusion, so there really isn't anyway to support the statement either way, until some lawyer does blog about it or soemthing to have a "reliable secondary source" for the statement. So, I guess it is really moot, but an interesting thing to discuss and decipher. Feel free to point out things like this on its talk page so that editor can make sure to have proper sources for statements of that kind in the future to help keep this article about a license factual and not just guesswork. the D&D wikiproject always welcomes outside opinions about the articles and can always use fresh pairs of eyes to catch minor mistakes that create factual inaccuracies. shadzar-talk 04:34, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)

[edit]

The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 16:11, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)

[edit]

The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:30, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)

[edit]

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:30, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)

[edit]

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:57, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:32, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:36, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)

[edit]

The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:20, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)

[edit]

The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:48, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Undue

[edit]

My understanding is that you introduced the reference to WP:UNDUE into WP:WAF back in with this edit. This principal is currently under discussion at WT:WAF and I would be grateful for your comments about its introduction. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 11:04, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)

[edit]

The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:31, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)

[edit]

The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:52, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Hornbook -- a new WP:Law task force for the J.D. curriculum

[edit]

Hi DCB4W,

I'm asking Wikipedians who are interested in United States legal articles to take a look at WP:Hornbook, the new "JD curriculum task force".

Our mission is to assimilate into Wikipedia all the insights of an American law school education, by reducing hornbooks to footnotes.

  • Over the course of a semester, each subpage will shift its focus to track the unfolding curriculum(s) for classes using that casebook around the country.
  • It will also feature an extensive, hyperlinked "index" or "outline" to that casebook, pointing to pages, headers, or {{anchors}} in Wikipedia (example).
  • Individual law schools can freely adapt our casebook outlines to the idiosyncratic curriculum devised by each individual professor.
  • I'm encouraging law students around the country to create local chapters of the club I'm starting at my own law school, "Student WP:Hornbook Editors". Using WP:Hornbook as our headquarters, we're hoping to create a study group so inclusive that nobody will dare not join.

What you can do now:

1. Add WP:Hornbook to your watchlist, {{User Hornbook}} to your userpage, and ~~~~ to Wikipedia:Hornbook/participants.
2. If you're a law student,
(You don't have to start the club, or even be involved in it; just help direct me to someone who might.)
3. Introduce yourself to me. Law editors on Wikipedia are a scarce commodity. Do knock on my talk page if there's an article you'd like help on.

Regards, Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 20:19, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)

[edit]

The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:16, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks,  Roger Davies talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ECW

[edit]

I am sorry but I do not understand this citation, "Op. Cit. at III, VII" what does it mean? -- PBS (talk) 14:00, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. Please see Wikipedia:Footnotes#Style recommendations, the trouble is "at III, VII" does not say what it is it is referring to. Before I filled it out a bit, the previous citations only said [1] (see User talk:Kc10buckeye). As the "previous citation" may become another citation at any time, either through the one before one being deleted, or an additional one being added betwixt the two , "at" needs to be replaced with some sort of tag as described in the link you gave me (Op. cit.) or better still a "short note" as described in WP:CITE. Could you please make such an adjustment? -- PBS (talk) 17:50, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks much clearer. -- PBS (talk) 08:10, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)

[edit]

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:34, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!

[edit]

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators,  Roger Davies talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)

[edit]

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:34, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!

[edit]

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:32, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)

[edit]

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:32, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)

[edit]

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 08:43, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)

[edit]

The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:57, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)

[edit]

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:20, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:18, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)

[edit]

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:13, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinator elections have opened!

[edit]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:39, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)

[edit]

The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:34, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)

[edit]

The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:14, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)

[edit]

The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:59, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)

[edit]


The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LII (June 2010) 		Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

Catch up with our project's activities over the last month, including the new Recruitment working group and Strategy think tank

Articles

Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content

Members

June's contest results plus the latest awards to our members

Editorial

LeonidasSpartan shares his thoughts on how, as individual editors, we can deal with frustration and disappointment in our group endeavour

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)

[edit]


The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIII (July 2010) 		Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

New parameter for military conflict infobox introduced;
Preliminary information on the September coordinator elections

Articles

Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content

Members

July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy

Editorial

Opportunities for new military history articles

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:19, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIV (August 2010)

[edit]


The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIV (August 2010) 		Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

The return of reviewer awards, task force discussions, and more information on the upcoming coordinator election

Articles

A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound

Members

Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants

Editorial

In the first of a two-part series, Moonriddengirl discusses the problems caused by copyright violations

To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Milhist election has started!

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies talk 21:31, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LV (September 2010)

[edit]


The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LV (September 2010) 		Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals

Articles

A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles

Members

Our newest A-class medal recipients, this September's top contestants, plus the reviewers' Roll of Honour (Apr-Sep 2010)

Editorial

In the final part of our series on copyright, Moonriddengirl describes how to deal with copyright infringements on Wikipedia

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:13, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:18, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:13, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010

[edit]


To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 20:34, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 15:30, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:30, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 01:32, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:11, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011

[edit]

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:21, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011

[edit]

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:44, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011

[edit]

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 21:49, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Military Historian of the Year

[edit]

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:54, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.[reply]

Military history coordinator election

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 08:51, 10 September 2012 (UTC) User:DCB4W/sandbox


Hello. There is currently a discussion at WP:ANI regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —84.52.101.196 (talk) 20:52, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Al Groh may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:09, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 17:20, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 03:00, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

[edit]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

User group for Military Historians

[edit]

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

[edit]

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:28, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

[edit]

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DCB4W&oldid=1178004977"