User talk:DATRUTHSPITTA

Welcome!

Hello, DATRUTHSPITTA, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! జె.వి.ఆర్.కె.ప్రసాద్ 23:44, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Recent edits to PlayStation 4

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, PlayStation 4, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! MrBill3 (talk) 04:21, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DATRUTHSPITTA, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi DATRUTHSPITTA! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gender pronoun vandalism

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jazz Jennings. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Please see MOS:IDENTITY: we respect the gender identity of transgender individual. Persisting in making such changes will result in being blocked or banned from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Skyerise (talk) 20:13, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jazz Jennings, you may be blocked from editing. Skyerise (talk) 21:30, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jazz Jennings. —Granger (talk · contribs) 21:41, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style. ToonLucas22 (talk) 21:50, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jazz Jennings. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Skyerise (talk) 21:51, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Jac16888 ^Talk 21:53, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Jazz Jennings shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ToonLucas22 (talk) 21:53, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]