User talk:D'Iberville

Bon Jour!

Welcome!

Hello, D'Iberville, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Karmafist 01:01, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My edit at 198

Hello, you asked Oleg Alexandrov to comment about my recent edit at 198 (number). You could have asked me directly, as I'm glad to explain my reasoning. I removed the facts that 198 = 100 + 90 + 8 and that 198 is a 67-gonal number, because I think they are uninteresting: I think that is clear for the first fact, and the second fact follows from the general rule that 3n is an (n−1)-gonal number, so you can say something like that for every multiple of 3. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 14:13, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Jitse that it is not interesting that 198 = 100 + 90 + 8. If I think about it, I also agree that it is not that interesting that 198 is a 67-gonal number. I don't really mind that info though.

But please note that if n is a polygonal number, that is not by itself a good enough of an excuse to create an article about n. That is to say, this article seems to have other interesting info too, but in the future if there is an article containing only the divisors of a number and the fact that it is polygonal, then that article is a good candidate for deletion.

On other matters, when you make links, you should like like this: abundant number, rather than like this: Abundant Number. That is, do not use capitals unless at the beginning of sentence. That is the convention in here. Same for 67-gonal Number, it needs to be: 67-gonal number. Cheers, Oleg Alexandrov 16:08, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Canada

Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there!--DarkEvil 17:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Merci. Since that's about the extent of my Canadien-French, and I don't want to make an ass of myself, I'll just say thank you for your kind words! Nach0king 09:26, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

À Hauteur d'homme

Quel honneur! Merci beaucoup pour la nomination. --Liberlogos 20:50, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT the scope of WikiProject Ottawa is being debated. Your input is requested. Thank you. GreenJoe 20:24, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject France

Hello! We are a group of editors working to improve the quality of France related articles. You look like someone who might be interested in joining us in the France WikiProject and so I thought I'd drop you a line and invite you! We'd love to have you in our project :-) STTW (talk) 15:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Westboro

The article had no assertion of notability, and was a speedy deletion candidate as such. If you can show me that reliable sources exist to demonstrate its importance I am happy to restore the article. Phil Sandifer (talk) 20:57, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Westboro Baptist Church (Ottawa)

Hi. I just came across User:D'Iberville/Westboro Baptist Church (Ottawa), which has been there for quite a while with no work being done on it. I appreciate you have not contributed to Wikipedia for several years and may no longer be around, but I thought I'd ask you about it before I nominate it for possible deletion. So, is there any likelihood that this will become a genuine article any time soon? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:01, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April - National Contribution Month

Good day D'Iberville,

During the month of April, Wikimedia Canada is preparing the National Contribution Month, and we are looking for experienced contributors to organize a contribution day (or half-day) in their region.

Contribution days are activities where Wikipedia's contributors, students, or anybody interested in contributing to Wikipedia meets together to collectively improve a predetermined theme. This meetings generally take place in library where references are easy of access, but can be organized in any communal room. Beside improving articles, a goal of this participatory workshops is to initiate neophyte in the cooperative contribution of Wikipedia.

If you are interested in organizing or participating in a contribution day in your region, communicate witht he national team on the project's talk page. The exact agenda of each local event is left to the discretion of the organizer. Help is available for the organization from contributors who already organized these type of days, so don't be worried. If you have any questions or want more information, don't hesitate to contact us.

Amqui (talk) 00:39, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Tu peux nous contacter en français aussi.

New mailing list for Wikimedia Canada

Good day, this message is to inform you that Wikimedia Canada has created a new mailing list operated by Mailman. This mailing list is for all discussions related to the Wikimedia movement in Canada, in both English and French. Announcements from Wikimedia Canada will always be bilingual, but you are welcomed to discuss in any language of your choice. The old google group will be abandoned. To join this mailing list, please go to [1]. To send messages to the list, write to general(at)discussions.wikimedia.ca. Also, please forward this message to anybody who may be interested. Thank you and do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. JP Béland (WMCA) (talk) 13:55, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Haywood-Wakefield Band for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Haywood-Wakefield Band is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haywood-Wakefield Band until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Raymie (t • c) 22:32, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 198 (number)

A tag has been placed on 198 (number) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

make way for new article from AFC

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 10:30, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]