User talk:Cyberwolf/Archives/2023/November

Archives

A cookie for you!

Don't be disheartened, keep up the good work and give WP:NOTYET a read

— TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 15:49, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Resilient Barnstar
	Thanks for standing and having the wisdom to retire :) Serial 15:56, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA

I concur with the above. Appreciate your stepping up but you need a little more time and experience before asking for the tools. Have a look at my criteria for RfA for some ideas on what I and other often look for. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:01, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to add that you seem to be on the right track @Cyberwolf:. Think of it as a slow plod towards the mop rather than a race. Keep up the good work. Knitsey (talk) 16:26, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly advice on G1 and patent nonsense

Hey! I came across Draft:Ratmouse while reviewing drafts, and saw that you had tagged the draft for deletion under WP:G1. While the page clearly has to go, your tagging of the page as patent nonsense isn't quite right. G1 would have been applicable had the page only contained the ASCII art, of course; but the presence of other, readable material that can make sense (even if it is obviously a hoax) means that G1 cannot be used here. The correct criterion for deletion would have been WP:G3 - vandalism and blatant hoaxes. I advise you to understand the policy on what is defined as "patent nonsense" on Wikipedia first before continuing your patrolling. Java Hurricane 16:04, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw your RfA and this. I echo the sentiments of my experienced colleagues above: please don't be disheartened! I've failed an RfA as well, on another Wikipedia, and I had the same crushed feeling after that. But I've stuck around, and so should you. I know highly respected admins who passed RfA on their second attempts, or even more. Ultimately, failing RfA isn't the end of the world - there's tons of things you could do to help out with without needing admin tools. Adminship is, to be honest, a very difficult responsibility, and I know editors who have been around for years but don't want to go for admin. Take a few years to learn the nitty-gritty of Wikipedia policies and customs, and get a track record of constructive work in admin-adjacent areas (such as AfDs and CSDs) and in discussions; I for one won't be surprised to see other experienced editors offer to nominate you for adminship. Already you are on the right path, long and rather tough as it is - and there are many editors (including myself) willing to help you out on it. Best of luck, once again! Java Hurricane 16:27, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No you're not, you're a member of the community...

...and i would urge you to Undo this. Happy days, ~ Lindsay^Hello 16:28, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

+1 And a valuable one at that. Serial 16:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi Cyberwolf. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:33, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Accusation of vandalism

Please verify how contributions to Jake Flores page were vandalism? Information provided does not fit criteria marching definition and none of the content added was defamatory. FeralFlores (talk) 16:58, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You called the staff of a college bigots and racists
This is not an accusation •Cyberwolf• 17:46, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see understand and have listened. Thank you for informing me of the direct line that indicated vandalism. I was just confused as the rest of my info was corrected and in positive light FeralFlores (talk) 01:49, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Two years ago?

The articles are same, and nothing changed so far Raybak Melk Abdesselem - Wikipedia so why did you revert my edit? the references and the wiki page are same. 182.190.106.178 (talk) 13:48, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not actually the page was deleted then recreated and currently conforms to Wp:gng now •Cyberwolf• 13:51, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You know nothing about notability then, gymnastic or martial notability has this must specific Wikipedia:WikiProject Martial arts/Notability - Wikipedia

Olympic participant or world champion of a significant international organization; - more than a few dozen competitors,

Repeated medalist (as an adult black belt, i.e. 1st dan equivalent or higher rank) in another significant event; - (e.g. competitors from multiple nations or significant national tournament, not an internal school champion)

He is only a junior athlete and the article, and the references are same as it was previously deleted than how come it is passing now? lol have you recover the draft? go and check it. 182.190.106.178 (talk) 13:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to learn the notability of Wikipedia first Wikipedia:Notability (sports) @Cyberwolf 182.190.106.178 (talk) 13:58, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anyways, I have notified the administrator who deleted this article before. 182.190.106.178 (talk) 13:59, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The only reason i rolled it back because that is the wrong way to do speedy deletion and i have tagged it •Cyberwolf• 14:10, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no, no need it i see 2 references there so wait 182.190.106.178 (talk) 14:13, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why delete

Why you want to delete? Leroile (talk) 14:39, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It’s not notable? •Cyberwolf•talk? 14:40, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to add references but you did revert back Leroile (talk) 14:43, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

None of them were related to the buisness •Cyberwolf•talk? 14:45, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it was from Google news, they mentioned Leroile (talk) 14:47, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you should go to Google news on the tutorial Leroile (talk) 14:48, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They mentioned it passively 2 times •Cyberwolf•talk? 14:49, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please, do it yourself if you know better than anyone else Leroile (talk) 14:50, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of reverting, do the job Leroile (talk) 14:51, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am a volunteer. Please dont tell me to “do the job” •Cyberwolf•talk? 14:52, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But tell me what I should, I tried to do the tuto Leroile (talk) 14:54, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Find articles about the company not just a passing mention •Cyberwolf•talk? 14:55, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Any of these are good?

https://techweez.com/2023/10/30/ai-job-market-impact/

https://myfox8.com/business/press-releases/globenewswire/8755342/salarship-comprehensive-online-career-job-board-takes-the-guesswork-out-of-the-search/ Leroile (talk) 15:02, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No the fox 8 is a simple copy paste from salarship
And tech weez is only a passing mention •Cyberwolf•talk? 15:26, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 November 2023

In the media: Propaganda and photos, lunatics and a lunar backup

News and notes: Update on Wikimedia's financial health

Traffic report: If it bleeds, it leads

Recent research: Canceling disputes as the real function of ArbCom

Wikimania: Wikimania 2024 scholarships

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:42, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Viceroy Research

Hi Cyberwolf. We saw that there are blatantly incorrect statements on the Viceroy Research page and are attempting to correct this. Many of the statements are either completely incorrect, not referenced or both. I have left a full list on the "talk" section of that page. --ViceroyResearch (talk) 14:01, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would have to agree I will work on it •Cyberwolf•talk? 14:03, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	I was just scrolling by page history, and I found your name, and guess my luck. Happy first anniversary of editing! The 🏎 Corvette 🏍 ZR1^{(The Garage)} 22:25, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting edits

Hello Cyberwolf, hope you're doing well. I'm curious about the reason why you reverted and then promptly reinstated my edits on Generative artificial intelligence twice? Mooonswimmer 18:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was a mistake my rollback confirmation isn’t working •Cyberwolf•talk? 18:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]