User talk:Csari
- Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments. You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- Simplified Ruleset
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Wikipedia Glossary
- And remember:
- Be Bold!,
- Don't let grumpy users scare you off.,
- Learn from others,
- Play nicely with others, and
- Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!.
- If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
- If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.
- P.S. I'm happy to help new users. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)
Happy Wiki-ing!
- СПУТНИКССС Р 03:30, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Nonketotic hyperglycinemia
[edit]I see you've already started the article! I've added some extra information to it, though there doesn't seem to be a lot of information on the web about it. CheekyMonkey 18:28, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
Druid's Foot
[edit]Didn't appear to meet any of the criterion for speedy deletion, so I placed the {{subst:afd}} tag on it instead. Keep up the good work.
brenneman{T}{L} 03:16, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
Hi, the article pheromone, which you recently helped improve, has been voted science collaboration of the week. Give us a hand when you can!
Best,
Samsara (talk • contribs) 00:43, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
Bot nonsense
[edit]Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed by an automated bot. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If you feel you have received this notice in error, please contact the bot owner // Tawkerbot2 20:05, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- that wasn't vandalism, it was an attempt to split two unrelated articles and give them a reasonable disambiguation page instead. (See Bradley method.) Guess I'll go do it again. :( -- Csari 20:09, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- See rory096's reply on the bots talk page, basically what the bot needs is a redirect there when you move a page, otherwise the bot sees it as a page blanking, 99.999% of the time when that happens its vandalism and as another user so nicely put it, the work the bot saves well warrants the tiny bit of extra work it creates, anyways, I hope that explains things a bit :) -- Tawker 07:59, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
- that wasn't vandalism, it was an attempt to split two unrelated articles and give them a reasonable disambiguation page instead. (See Bradley method.) Guess I'll go do it again. :( -- Csari 20:09, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Pharmacophore discovery
[edit]The article Pharmacophore discovery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Dictionary article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rathfelder (talk) 21:43, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!