User talk:CrucibleX

Welcome!

Hello, CrucibleX, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as 470th Military Intelligence Brigade (United States), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sephiroth storm (talk) 22:33, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 470th Military Intelligence Brigade (United States)

The article 470th Military Intelligence Brigade (United States) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable military unit. Unit does not meet MILHIST standards for inclusion, nor does it have significant verifiable coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sephiroth storm (talk) 22:33, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I want to clarify, I am not stating that the unit isn't notable in the real world, but it does not meet our standards for notability. We do have articles on some units that are notable because of a unique mission, like 780th/704th MI, CIFA, ect. As well as many other articles that need to be deleted under this policy, but all in due time. If you feel this article is notable, please discuss on the article's talk page. Be prepared to show evidence of significant third part coverage, participation in significant conflicts or events. Sephiroth storm (talk) 22:38, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually a brigade will likely qualify IAW WP:MILUNIT. Moreover, WP:POTENTIAL should be considered. As the PROD is removed, these are moot points, but I think interested editors will continue to improve the article. – S. Rich (talk) 04:03, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on Talk:470th Military Intelligence Brigade (United States), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. – S. Rich (talk) 03:59, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Michigan Army National Guard

Thank you for your addition of units down to the company level at this article. However, because of WP:BURDEN, you must provide a source. Thus I've rolled all your edits back. Please revert me and add a source this time. PLease also be careful NOT to remove the information about the 63rd Brigade, which is valuable in its own right. Kind regards Buckshot06 (talk) 19:52, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]