User talk:Crimekhobor

This is Crimekhobor's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manonesh Das (December 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manonesh Das and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:58, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Crimekhobor! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:58, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Ktkvtsh

So far i've updated and added news sources reference links. And most news links about independent of the subject (it's not passing mentions). My request is if you think its dont show significant coverage, please translate all resource links in english.

Can you please tell me the exact issue that i can solve? Crimekhobor (talk) 06:55, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bengali charan journalist Crimekhobor (talk) 07:23, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you've updated it, you can resubmit it for review. I'd say there are too many sources in the lead paragraph and not enough in the body of the article. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:19, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ktkvtsh

I've updated the draft and resubmitted. I also reduced some resources from lead paragraph.

Please check it. Crimekhobor (talk) 05:54, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see the work you've done. Another thing to mention, in the career section, there are too many sources, specifically at the end of the section. You should be placing up to 3 sources for each statement, though most of the time one source per sentence should be good. See WP:INLINE for some readings on inline citations. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:35, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Crimekhobor. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 00:27, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]