User talk:CovidWriter

Welcome!

Hello, CovidWriter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page SAFE Banking Act did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:58, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SAFE Banking Act

Hello! I think I can help find a RS for SAFE Banking Act. If I send you a few URLs, can you format the ref? ☆ Bri (talk) 22:23, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Couple of things

I've deleted the page as an attack page. Per WP:BLP, you must provide a reliable source for any statement about living persons.

Also, while I'm here, you mention at Draft_talk:Groyper that you have a problem with how responsibility for the Holocaust make lots of claims in the first two paragraphs without references to support them, claiming There's definitely a bias. Which statements in that article do you think need to be removed, challenged, or sourced in that article or similar ones? Ian.thomson (talk) 22:13, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For one thing, the lead says that responsibility for the Holocaust rests with Hitler, without showing evidence (1) that there was a Holocaust and (2) that Hitler did it. Hitler was never found guilty of the Holocaust in a court of law and is rumored to still be living today in retirement in Argentina (although he was said to have died, no body was ever produced to prove this; perhaps he struck a deal with the Soviets to have them transport him overseas in exchange for his cooperation), so these statements are a potential violation of BLP policy.

Some say that if there were Jewish deaths (such as that of Anne Frank) this was the result of causes such as typhoid rather than a deliberate attempt at extermination, and undoubtedly Hitler would have had some interesting arguments to present in his defense but until he is actually given his day in court it would be inappropriate to cast unwarranted aspersions, given the presumption of innocence which we are accustomed to guarantee in civilized western countries. CovidWriter (talk) 03:01, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This is clearly an illegitimate account created to attack and target specific editors. I don't really care if you are evading a block or are creating this account to evade scrutiny, the end result is the same.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 03:12, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to pay tribute to an editor who had put a lot of hard work into the incel article and deserved recognition for the struggle she deals with due to her own situation, what has inspired her to act constructively by writing that article. CovidWriter (talk) 03:29, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 03:31, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]