User talk:Countryboy603

Welcome

I saw your recent comment, and I thought you might be interested in https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/childdevelopment/positiveparenting/toddlers2.html "Toddlers (2–3 years)" from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. While this might be a popular name only for kids who are barely 3 years old, rather than the ones who are almost 4 (36 months rather than 47 months), it's not technically wrong. WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Auntie Clem's Bakery (January 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NBOOK

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Auntie Clem's Bakery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Auntie Clem's Bakery, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:27, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Countryboy603! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:27, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Auntie Clem's Bakery (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Auntie Clem's Bakery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Auntie Clem's Bakery, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 08:20, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries and spelling

Please use edit summaries to explain your edits, and take care about different varieties of English. I thought your recent edit to Alex Sobel was silly vandalism until I looked at Councillor and saw that "Councilor" is an American spelling. PamD 06:22, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

George Cummings (disambiguation)

Hi Countryboy603, the Manual of Style for disambiguation pages clearly states that the primary topic (the one at the base name 'George Cummings') should go at the top of the page (WP:DABPRIMARY). Furthermore, there is no need for both {{hndis}} and {{disambiguation}} - if the page contains only people with the same name, {{hndis}} is sufficient (the page Human name disambiguation explains). Leschnei (talk) 12:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Australian Army units has been accepted

List of Australian Army units, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Antan O 02:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting my edit on Lights Up

Hello Countryboy603, I appreciate your enthusiasm in reverting vandalism but the edits were not unconstructive and I did not remove content without explanation. I merely rephrased it. Please be careful while reverting edits and marking them as bad faith. --Ashley yoursmile! 07:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

General alert

Hollo Countryboy603, you've reverted my edit on Raj Chandra Bose. I advice you to carefully check the information, while reverting. See this and this. I've corrected the information of the birth place of Raj Chandra Bose. So before reverting, carefully check the information. Have a good day! বাক্যবাগীশ (talk) 12:14, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cow

Hello, Countryboy603. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Cow, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 07:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Problem with A Poo

Hi. Please stop making arbitrary and disruptive edits, as you did with this edit to The Problem with A Poo. The word in question is sentient, not sapient. By changing the wikilink to "sapient", you directed it to a disambiguation page, an indication that you didn't even bother checking that page to see if it was an article. Nightscream (talk) 05:34, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop making non-constructive edits to the article on The Problem with A Poo, as you did with this edit. If you continue to make disruptive edits, you risk being blocked from editing. Please do not make that necessary. Nightscream (talk) 13:26, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Udder. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Stop doing this. You have tried this at least four times. Meters (talk) 07:10, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Auntie Clem's Bakery

Hello, Countryboy603. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Auntie Clem's Bakery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dominic (novel)

Hello, Countryboy603. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dominic (novel), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:11, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Domestic animals

Please do not revert edits with an edit summary without giving one yourself or take it to the talk page. LittleJerry (talk) 19:19, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK.--Countryboy603 (talk) 17:13, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Bait-and-switch (trope)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Bait-and-switch (trope) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/BaitAndSwitch and note that TVTropes is under CC-BY-NC-SA. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. dudhhr_Contribs 19:48, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello, I'm ScottishFinnishRadish. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Cattle have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anesthesia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doctor. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barry Morphew (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Alpha3031 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

More specifically, see §Crime victims and perpetrators of the relevant guideline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Barry Morphew and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Alpha3031 (t • c) 13:35, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Your recent editing history at Veganism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Use the talk page to gain consensus with at least two other editors, WP:CON. Zefr (talk) 23:04, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I noticed that you recently removed content from Tranquilizer without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I see no discussion on redirecting the article, and you gave no reasons in your edit summary. Please wait for a consensus formed in an appropriate venue before redirecting the article. Donald Albury 18:14, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Murder of George Floyd Requested Move

I have hatted your informal discussion about the title of Murder of George Floyd. If you believe the article should be renamed, please make a formal WP:RM. But before you make a formal WP:RM, I encourage you to review WP:DEATHS, as well as the previous naming discussions on that article in the archives:

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Murder_of_George_Floyd/Archive_7#Requested_move_20_April_2021

Article was unanimously moved to "Murder of George Floyd" per WP:DEATHS

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Murder_of_George_Floyd/Archive_7#Requested_move_15_May_2021

An editor tried to reopen the discussion to revert the decision made by a consensus less than a month later, with no new information. Four editors immediately objected to another discussion so soon after the last one was closed. RM was closed, and a 6-month moratorium was issued on moving the article.

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Murder_of_George_Floyd/Archive_7#name_change

An editor violated the moratorium and tried to move the discussion again in June. Discussion was immediately closed.

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Murder_of_George_Floyd/Archive_7#Changing_the_title_from_Murder

An editor violated the moratorium and tried to move the discussion again in September. Discussion was immediately closed.

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Murder_of_George_Floyd/Archive_7#%22Murder%22_is_Facutally_Inaccurate_for_use_in_Title

An editor violated the moratorium and tried to move the discussion again in November. Discussion was immediately closed.

The moratorium is over. By all means, try again, but this is a waste of your time and everyone else's. Derek Chauvin was convicted for the Murder of George Floyd. It is clear-cut Wikipedia policy to name the article "Murder of..." per WP:DEATHS — a policy which was created in the wake of this specific incident. This has been rehashed and rehashed four times now. A fifth time will not change the outcome. Combefere ★ Talk 05:48, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Veganism into Draft:Vegan diet. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hello. Help delete template for acticle Akane Yamaguchi. Thanks you. 27.64.221.154 (talk) 05:52, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Wich template do you want me to delete? --Countryboy603 (talk) 05:54, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thandi (rhino) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Thandi (rhino), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 10:46, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thandi has been accepted

Thandi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:36, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Veganism, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. This garbage ref isn't close to being WP:RS. Give more attention to quality sources on topics with WP:WEIGHT. Zefr (talk) 06:28, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Draft:Vegan diet. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:32, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vegan diet (December 8)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The comment left by Zoglophie was: Per comment, the article for vegan diet already exist in Veganism and Plant-based diet. This material was largely copied from those two articles so to avoid duplication, I'm rejecting this. Consider adding the additional information you have to those articles and make sure it is supported by WP:RS.

zoglophie^•talk• 14:36, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Vegan diet has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vegan diet. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:37, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vegan diet

Hello, Countryboy603. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vegan diet, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Countryboy603

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Countryboy603, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Stale unfiled RfAs and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Countryboy603 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 18:24, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]