User talk:CountZ

Welcome!

Hello, CountZ, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  -- Francs2000 02:24, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Veganism NPOV

See Talk:Veganism Kellen ^T 09:08, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Shu Han (disambiguation)

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Shu Han (disambiguation), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 06:00, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Shu Han (disambiguation)

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Shu Han (disambiguation), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 07:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Sacramento RT map.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Sacramento RT map.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 01:19, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:NYC subway-4b-shrunk-2.png

Thanks for uploading Image:NYC subway-4b-shrunk-2.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:56, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

NYC subway-4b-shrunk-2.png

Wow. I've seen a few attempts at making decent subway diagrams in my time, and this one is right up there with the best of them. It must have taken quite some time to finsish. Great, great work. Pneumaman (talk) 11:09, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:NYC_subway-4b.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:NYC_subway-4b.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 22:17, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

NYC subway-4b-shrunk-2.png

Hi,

Noticed a small problem with your current service map on the New York City Subway page. It shows the rush-hour B terminating at 205th St, however it terminates one stop to the south at Bedford Park Blvd.

Can you please fix that?

Thanks, Acps110 (talk) 00:25, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

NYC Subway map

Wow. I just came across your NYC Subway map and all I can way is "wow". I love it. I like it more than the official map, the Vignelli map, and the KICK map. You can see all three of those maps here, but I still think yours is much better. Anyway, I just wanted say "great job" with the map, and I was wondering if you had a SVG version of it to upload. This way the map could be easily updated when service routes change, stations close/reopen, etc. Plus an the SVG map can be infinitely large and isn't restricted to the original resolution it was uploaded with. But it's great to see someone else on here who has a "mild obsession with mass transit". –Dream out loud (talk) 18:35, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Removal of Image:Sf-new-map-present1.gif

Hi, just to let you know I removed this image at Caltrain and Bay Area Rapid Transit. The image is great but I had to remove it because it is too large and it is not helpful to readers if they can't see it. I also had to say, your maps look great, so hopefully you will stick around in Wikipedia. Happy editing—Chris! _ct 02:05, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

The VTA map is not bad, but I think it is better for the VTA map to have the same style as the BART map. Also the black background made it extremely hard to see. So, it would be great if you can improve it a bit.—Chris! _ct 00:55, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

What I meant by the same style is really the background color and how the lines are drawn. I wouldn't like to see the freeways go away, either.—Chris! _ct 02:54, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Also, please feel free to improve the BART map if you want. The FP nom won't be affected. Actually, it could improve the chances of it getting promoted.—Chris! _ct 02:58, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of File:San-Francisco-Bay-Area-rail.gif

A tag has been placed on File:San-Francisco-Bay-Area-rail.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CountZ (talk) 05:45, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

NYC subway map

I hope this is the right place... I notice that you updated the NYC subway map?

Honestly, I do not really like the new version. Transfers are not easily recognisable at a glance, neither are the shores, and it does not indicate anymore which services don't always run (part of the G etc.)

The old version, however, is absolutely amazing! --Wwwdigi (talk) 19:55, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

It does look better now! But how about a thin outline at the transfer stations? Like this:

http://i33.tinypic.com/33tghec.jpg

--Wwwdigi (talk) 08:11, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

NYC subway map

Hey, nice work with the NYC subway map (and the Bay Area one as well, I wish the NYC one looked as sharp and typographically sophisticated).

I was wondering if you'd seen Vignelli's 2008 subway diagram for Men's Vogue? Here are some detailed close-ups.

Also, would you be willing to share a version of your file that didn't have the text rendered as outlines? There are some illustrations I'd like to make of the under-construction Second Avenue subway, 7 subway extension, and a few other proposed projects.

Great work!

Scrolando (talk) 20:43, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Revised BART map.svg

Hi, how are you. I am wondering if you can modify the map to accommodate the new line change. See [1] and [2] Thanks, cheers—Chris!_c/t 00:00, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

So there is no way you can update?—Chris!_c/t 00:49, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/New York subway diagram

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:NYC_subway-4D.svg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Makeemlighter (talk) 01:33, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

How many uses are there? If there are a lot, you could do it with AutoWikiBrowser, otherwise, just do it manually. J Milburn (talk) 13:42, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

More NYCS map questions/requests

Congratulations on your featured picture promotion! But I have a few suggestions for you regarding your New York City Subway map:

• As I understand the diagram, the black boxes mean transfer stations with 2+ platforms, as opposed to cross-platform interchanges. If I am reading that correctly, these should be corrected:
  • Court Street – Borough Hall is not a cross-platform interchange.
  • Prospect Park (BMT Brighton Line) is a cross-platform interchange (although the Franklin Avenue Shuttle only connects directly with the uptown Brighton Line).
• 125th Street (IRT Lexington Avenue Line) has a connection to Metro-North. Flushing–Main Street has a connection to the LIRR. Union Turnpike–Kew Gardens and Far Rockaway–Mott Avenue can also be said to have LIRR connections, but as those span a few blocks, it's up to you if you want to include them.
• There are more bus connections to the airports than are currently shown: for example, M60 in Manhattan, B15, Q10, Q48, Q72, etc.
• The J/M/Z uses the Williamsburg Bridge.
• What do you think about adding the Roosevelt Island Tramway?
• Can you add the boundary lines between boroughs?
• Is there a way to include somehow the lines that are being built: the 7 Subway Extension and the Second Avenue Subway (Phase 1)? These should be distinguished from the two closed Cortlandt Street stations, which were previously opened. (Arthur Kill Road SIR station is also being constructed from scratch.)

I also support User:Wwwdigi's suggestion for outlines around the transfer stations, unless there's an aesthetic reason why that's undesirable.

I also have some requests for you to create some files:

• Could you "break up" the diagram by borough, in which each borough has its own file? (Staten Island may or may not be necessary.) I am in the process of breaking up List of New York City Subway stations by borough, and I would like to have each borough to have its own diagram.
• Are you able to create a file that shows all the rapid transit lines and stations that existed throughout the New York City Subway's history? By this, I mean all the subway and elevated lines of the IRT, BRT/BMT and IND through the present.

I realize I am asking so much of you here, and I apologize for that. But I am asking for the sake of the Wikipedia project. Otherwise, I'm indebted to your service. Tinlinkin (talk) 09:24, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia is a hobby for most people here, including myself, so I understand your time constraints. I have a few responses:

• Transfers: I suppose you didn't realize it, but the boxes did distinguish between traditional transfer stations and cross-transfer stations. I would know because I have worked on List of New York City Subway transfer stations and your map confirms this, save for the 2 exceptions. The map would also be helpful to explain why the MTA says there are 468 (466 open) stations as compared to 423 (421) stations when certain transfer stations are counted as one, which is the global standard for station counting.
• Rail connections: Maybe you're unfamiliar with some of the connections. To point out some for comparison:
  • 125th Street 4/5/6 → Harlem-125th MNRR: ~492 ft [3] (not included currently)
  • Flushing-Main Street 7 → Flushing-Main Street LIRR: ~375 ft to Pt. Washington-bound entrance [4] (not included)
  • Mets-Willets Point 7 → Mets-Willets Point LIRR: ~ 945 ft [5] (included)
  • Nostrand Avenue A/C → Nostrand Avenue LIRR: ~725 ft [6] (included)
  • Forest Hills-71st Avenue E/F/G/R/V → Forest Hills LIRR: ~579 ft [7] (included)
• It was also weird that Mets – Willets Point (IRT Flushing Line) even has a connection listed as Mets–Willets Point (LIRR station) is a seasonal-use station, and not many commuters would make that connection there anyway (Flushing is a more logical choice).
• New construction: Ah, superstition. But I think it's safe to include those lines. They are being constructed now, though as the completion dates are very vague and ever-changing, your tepidity is justified. I recall the Washington Metro had the southeastern Green Line shown as being built on its maps for many years before it opened.
• Boundaries: "The geography is purposely vague to prevent people from trying to navigate the city using the diagram." I wouldn't have thought of that, but that's a good idea. The boundary lines also don't need to be precise, but they still may be important, particularly around the Myrtle–Wyckoff Avenues and Marble Hill – 225th Street areas.

I think I can learn the map-making software quickly, but because I don't come from a graphics design background, my results would probably look suboptimal. Tinlinkin (talk) 23:41, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

NYCS map

First, I want to say that I love the map. It's definitely better than any professional map I've seen. Much better than the old one, too. I'd like to make a few minor updates, but I want to know exactly what typeface you used. I know its some form of Helvetica, but the standard Helvetica font did not seem to match up. Since there's so many kinds of Helvetica [8], I was wondering which one you use. Thanks. –Dream out loud (talk) 06:06, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

NYC Subway Map

Hi, I really like the map you created for the NYCS page. It's a more simplified version of many maps that I've seen, plus it definitely has a 1970's-retro flare to it. One small error though - you forgot the 111th Street station on the 7 train. But yeah, great design! It'd make an awesome poster.

Yorkiano (talk) 10:22, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Addendum

Hey, did someone erase the 79th Street station on the 1 train? The space is there, just that there's nothing mentioned...

Yorkiano (talk) 18:33, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

File:NYC subway-4D.svg

I noticed you updated the map. There is a stray V between Myrtle Ave/Broadway and Central Ave. Can you remove that? Acps110 ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:00, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Can you please update this map to contain web-safe fonts rather than the fonts as paths? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.83.166.170 (talk) 15:19, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Map station names

The version of File:NYC subway-4D.svg that I uploaded contained several station name changes to reflect the naming on Wikipedia. The next version you uploaded reverted most of them. Can you please restore these updates?

• "Crescent St/Fulton St" (J) is simply "Crescent St"
• "Jamaica Avenue/Van Wyck Blvd" (E) is simply "Jamaica/Van Wyck"
• The "Van Alst" in 21st Street (G) has been removed
• "Lower East Side" has been removed from 2 Av (F)
• "West Broadway" has been removed from Chambers St (1)
• "Morrison Av/Sound View Av" is now "Morrison Av/Soundview"
• "Broadway" has been dropped from Steinway St (R)
• "Union Av" has been dropped from Broadway (G)

Other notes:

• Please add the M60 note to 125 St (4).
• <SIR> is not officially recognized, replace it with "SIR express"

Thanks! — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 02:37, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

POTD notification

POTD

Hi CountZ,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:NYC subway-4D.svg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 18, 2011. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2011-03-18. howcheng {chat} 22:56, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

NYC Subway map

Hey man, just wanted to remind you that Smith–Ninth Streets (IND Culver Line) station is closed til mid-2012, so you should edit your subway maps to show it as no regular service. 76.116.1.235 (talk) 22:48, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	I'm not sure if you saw this thread. However, I would like to thank you for updating your map. Epic Genius (talk) 00:16, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

NYC Subway Map update

Thanks for all the contributions for the NYC subway map. One update that I see is missing from your map is that the Fulton St. and Broad St. stops on the J/Z line in lower Manhattan are still marked as weekday-only. As of June 11, 2015, these stops run full time. See: http://www.mta.info/press-release/nyc-transit/weekend-j-service-extended-broad-st --Eyas (talk) 23:47, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

I would like to thank you too CountZ. Could you please update the subway map to reflect today's restoration of the W train? It would be much appreciated. epicgenius – (talk) 13:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, CountZ. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Svg version of your Bay Area transit map

I'm working on a project to visualize travel times within the combined Bart/Caltrain system, and a vector version of your map would make my life a lot easier. Does it exist, and if so, would you be willing to upload it? Thanks! Palmtree3000 (talk) 18:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, CountZ. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Fisa warrant listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fisa warrant. Since you had some involvement with the Fisa warrant redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — JFG ^talk 10:13, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CountZ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CountZ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Forward-Thrust-map.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Forward-Thrust-map.svg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SounderBruce 02:28, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

"Second franklin" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Second franklin. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 11#Second franklin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:08, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

"Dream oath opera" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Dream oath opera. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 29#Dream oath opera until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:42, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

"Judge carter" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Judge carter and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 19#Judge carter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:49, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

"Hey must be the money" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Hey must be the money has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 16 § Hey must be the money until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:24, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

"Baw with a ba" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Baw with a ba has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 22 § Baw with a ba until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:24, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

"You were working as a waitress in a cocktail bar" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect You were working as a waitress in a cocktail bar has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 14 § You were working as a waitress in a cocktail bar until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 21:10, 14 October 2024 (UTC)