User talk:Coolkids000

Welcome!

Hello, Coolkids000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Benon 10:11, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Abc01.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Abc01.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Sue Anne 07:42, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Karanges 2.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Karanges 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Sue Anne 07:42, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wybenga.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Wybenga.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Sue Anne 07:42, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:Example.jpgItalic text== Image:Silvia fernandes.jpg listed for deletion ==

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Silvia fernandes.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Sue Anne 07:42, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Peter rogers.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Peter rogers.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Sue Anne 07:42, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Michael robinson.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Michael robinson.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Sue Anne 07:42, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ambler.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Ambler.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Sue Anne 07:42, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Spence.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Spence.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Sue Anne 07:42, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. -- Alf ^melmac 10:05, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Home And Away

Please do not change this redirect again. There is a rule (WP:3RR) which will lead to you being banned if you do this again. The article Home and Away already exists. Please discuss any problems on the talk page. Yomangani 00:53, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy against WP:3RR and Vandalism. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. -- JLaTondre 01:00, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:TBR-NB2006.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TBR-NB2006.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:12, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:WilloughbyCouncil.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:WilloughbyCouncil.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:03, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Abc80s941.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Abc80s941.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:05, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Abc80s943.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Abc80s943.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:12, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1996 in Australian television

A tag has been placed on 1996 in Australian television, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Monkeytheboy (talk) 00:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the tag – the 1996 in Australian television article does not consist of just a navbox template like the ones deleted by User:Moonriddengirl below. It does contain a list of events, and although it doesn't have an introductory paragraph, neither do the other articles in the series – the navbox and the title do provide some context to the content. --Canley (talk) 02:10, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1997 in Australian television

The article 1997 in Australian television has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to expand the article, please feel free to recreate it, but please do not leave it with insufficient information to stand as a stub. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 01:38, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The articles 1983 in Australian television, 1984 in Australian television, 1985 in Australian television, 1986 in Australian television, 1981 in Australian television, 1982 in Australian television. Please do not create articles that consist only of a template. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 01:44, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Articles on Television

Your recent articles on Australian television seem to provide information that has created controversy on wether they are notable enough to have them included on the Wikipedia project.

However, before nominating the articles for deletion, I've asked for more input about the subject, due to the fact that your article does seem to have support from other users. Feel free to leave your comments at the discussion at Talk:1996 in Australian television. Please forgive me, but even though I don't want to nominate your article for deletion just yet, I also want to abide by Wikipedia policy. Thank you for understanding. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monkeytheboy (talk • contribs) 20:10, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of 1996 in Australian television

An editor has nominated 1996 in Australian television, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1996 in Australian television and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Taylor Square railway station, Sydney

I have nominated Taylor Square railway station, Sydney, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylor Square railway station, Sydney. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Bidgee (talk) 13:13, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Paddington railway station, Sydney

I have nominated Paddington railway station, Sydney, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paddington railway station, Sydney. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Bidgee (talk) 13:13, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Fox Studios railway station, Sydney

I have nominated Fox Studios railway station, Sydney, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fox Studios railway station, Sydney. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Bidgee (talk) 13:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Randwick railway station, Sydney

I have nominated Randwick railway station, Sydney, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randwick railway station, Sydney. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Bidgee (talk) 13:15, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kensington railway station, Sydney

I have nominated Kensington railway station, Sydney, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kensington railway station, Sydney. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Bidgee (talk) 13:16, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kingsford railway station, Sydney

I have nominated Kingsford railway station, Sydney, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingsford railway station, Sydney. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Bidgee (talk) 13:17, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Maroubra railway station, Sydney

I have nominated Maroubra railway station, Sydney, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maroubra railway station, Sydney. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Bidgee (talk) 13:18, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Newington railway station, Sydney

An article that you have been involved in editing, Newington railway station, Sydney, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newington railway station, Sydney. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Pikablu0530 (talk) 01:24, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation of Newington railway station, Sydney

A tag has been placed on Newington railway station, Sydney requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. -- Longhair\^talk 08:04, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of 2009 in Music

I have nominated 2009 in Music, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 in Music. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Chafford (talk) 08:12, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Lower North Shore Metro Extension

I have nominated Lower North Shore Metro Extension, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lower North Shore Metro Extension. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Bidgee (talk) 11:45, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Denistone East railway station, Sydney

I have nominated Denistone East railway station, Sydney, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denistone East railway station, Sydney. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Bidgee (talk) 11:47, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Northern Beaches Metro

I have nominated Northern Beaches Metro, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northern Beaches Metro. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Bidgee (talk) 12:03, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Pitt Street railway station, Sydney

I have nominated Pitt Street railway station, Sydney, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pitt Street railway station, Sydney. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? — Pikablu0530 (talk) 04:38, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:CityRailSydney/West Line stations

Template:CityRailSydney/West Line stations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Pikablu0530 (talk) 04:38, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:CityRailSydney/West Line

Template:CityRailSydney/West Line has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Pikablu0530 (talk) 04:38, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Melbourne produced TV programs

I have nominated List of Melbourne produced TV programs, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Melbourne produced TV programs. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mayalld (talk) 09:19, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with List of Melbourne produced TV programs. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Mayalld (talk) 09:42, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Southern Sydney T-way

A tag has been placed on Southern Sydney T-way, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it is patent nonsense and unreferenced

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. MrHarper (talk) 11:08, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article has now been deleted. A check with Transport NSW has revealed no such project is planned or announced. Please note this is taken very seriously as it compromises the integrity of Wikipedia, and future incidences of this sort of behaviour would likely see you blocked. Orderinchaos 05:37, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chandlers

A tag has been placed on Chandlers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Per Ardua (talk) 01:32, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The ARIA Music Show

A tag has been placed on The ARIA Music Show requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Oniongas (talk) 21:59, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Now: The Hits of Spring 2009

A tag has been placed on Now: The Hits of Spring 2009 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ceranthor 12:51, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of JB Hi-Fi Stores

The article List of JB Hi-Fi Stores has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Add no encyclopaedic value, Wikipedia is not a directory and is also unsourced.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bidgee (talk) 08:04, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of List of JB Hi-Fi Stores

I have nominated List of JB Hi-Fi Stores, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of JB Hi-Fi Stores. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ironholds (talk) 08:04, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with List of JB Hi-Fi Stores. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 08:14, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 72 (Australian TV channel)

A tag has been placed on 72 (Australian TV channel), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Inks.LWC (talk) 05:56, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This page was speedy deleted but restored at my request as there are some sources for it so I thought that a speedy was inappropiate. That said I'm not sure it would survive WP:AfD. I've added two sources to the article but can I suggest that you add more information and sources to the page if you want to guarantee it's survival - I probably don't know enough about the subject to be of much help. Dpmuk (talk) 13:53, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Coolkids000! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Rob Elliott - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 11:36, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Future Network Ten SD multichannel

The article Future Network Ten SD multichannel has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reubot (talk) 14:49, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mix '80s

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Mix '80s requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Bihco (talk) 14:01, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chemist Warehouse Remix

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Chemist Warehouse Remix requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Bihco (talk) 14:02, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mix '90s

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Mix '90s, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. - Vivvt (Talk) 14:02, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The first few unsuitable articles you created might have been innocent mistakes due to being unused to Wikipedia's standards. However, you have now been creating unsuitable articles since 2006, and by now you must be aware of the problems. Articles you have created include ones with no substantial content at all, ones without enough context to indicate what they are about, ones about subjects which are not notable, and ones which are downright vandalism. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:34, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]