User talk:Coltsmetsfan614
Welcome Coltsmetsfan614!
Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Do's and Don'ts:
|
If you need further help, you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}}
here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes
(~~~~)
at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own private sandbox for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put
{{My sandbox}}
on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.Sincerely, Jax 0677 (talk) 00:57, 16 July 2013 (UTC) (Leave me a message)
AFD comments
[edit]Hi Coltsmetsfan614. I appreciate your commentary at the Villify AFD, and Device related articles.
Anyways, I just wanted to give you a pointer. Please don't make this edit. I struck out your second Keep comment for a reason. The closing admin typically look at the general bolded stances to get an overview of the situation, to make a decision on whether or not the article should be kept. An editor is only allowed to state their stance once, (in this case, the bolded Keep) once. You have already done this. If you want to make further comments, that is completely fine, but you cannot start it off with a bolded Keep, you can either start it off with a bolded Comment, or you can just start writing. But you can't say Keep a second time.
Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! Sergecross73 msg me 15:17, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Response
[edit]Oh, ok. I'm sorry. I'm new to the editing process, and I'm still trying to learn all the rules. I apologize. I've changed it to Comment. Thanks for explaining! Coltsmetsfan614 msg me 21:46, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Target Audience Reviews is a blog
[edit]Please don't add it to the professional reviews template. If you would like it recognized as a professional site, you'll have to post at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard and inform me of the discussion. I'll add my opinion there. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:59, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
- Joshua Connelly states on http://targetaudiencereviews.com/authors/ that "I decided to start this blog". Three non-professional reviewers writing blog reviews about music. Please stop adding the site as you did on the The Civil Wars (album). Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:24, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Device Vilify Single 2013.jpg
[edit]![⚠](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/34/Ambox_warning_blue.svg/35px-Ambox_warning_blue.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Device Vilify Single 2013.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC)